Re: [arch-general] What happened to the Beginner's Guide?

2016-10-02 Thread Allan McRae
On 03/10/16 00:51, David C. Rankin wrote: > I wonder how Allan would view the matter. The Beginner's Guide should never have existed. A

Re: [arch-general] What happened to the Beginner's Guide?

2016-10-02 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 10/02/2016 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > I've been here since '09, and I've never seen a complaint such as you > describe. The reality is the Beginner's Guide was a very thorough and helpful > collection of information for new users that was made more necessary by the > removal of the arch

Re: [arch-general] What happened to the Beginner's Guide?

2016-10-02 Thread Jason Ryan via arch-general
On 02/10/16 at 09:51am, David C. Rankin wrote: The maintenance requirements were no greater or less than any of the constituent pages. This is not true. Regardless of what the true motivations for the current Arch devs are in removing the Beginner's Guide, I would recommend it be restored

Re: [arch-general] What happened to the Beginner's Guide?

2016-10-02 Thread David C. Rankin
On 09/22/2016 10:31 AM, Maxwell Anselm via arch-general wrote: > Another reason for the merge is to solve a perception problem. The > Beginner's Guide was one of the only wiki articles that consolidated all of > its information in one place, rather than organizing things into separate > articles