On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:25:06 +0200, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 02:52:32 CEST Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
>> btw. I'm not shure, where to report the bug?
>> - Arch bugtracker or
>> - upstream
>>
>> any ideas regarding this
>
>Report to ArchLinux Bug repository only if the
On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 02:52:32 CEST Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
> btw. I'm not shure, where to report the bug?
> - Arch bugtracker or
> - upstream
>
> any ideas regarding this
Report to ArchLinux Bug repository only if the bug is ArchLinux specific, that
is, cause by ArchLinux build proces
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:30:15AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm not sure where to start searching on this problem. I have a server with
> fluxbox and xscreensaver enabled. If I'm running xterm when the screensaver
> activates, if I return after a couple of hours, the xterm is unr
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:52:32 +0200, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
>I'm not shure, where to report the bug?
>- Arch bugtracker or
>- upstream
>
>any ideas regarding this
1.
https://www.google.de/?gws_rd=ssl#q=arch+linux+report+bug
2.
"Search for duplicates
If you encounter a problem or desire a n
On 10/08/2016 03:53 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst via arch-general wrote:
> That was over 2 years ago, and it was mentioned in an upgrade message
> (although it does not specifically mention the .path file).[1]
>
> Anyway, it can't really hurt to have a broken file there. Just remove the
> link and all
All,
I'm not sure where to start searching on this problem. I have a server with
fluxbox and xscreensaver enabled. If I'm running xterm when the screensaver
activates, if I return after a couple of hours, the xterm is unresponsive.
(instead of a normal solid black-box cursor, it is a white block
Hi Peter, *,
Am 09.10.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld:
> it seems some bluetooth has overwritten my bluetooth main.conf, as last
> change has been on September, 26th. Also, I cannot receive files any more, so
> I guess, I'd cahnaged sth. there. Unfortunately, I cannot remember, what
> chang
On 10/10/2016 06:39 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Thanks Mauro,
>
> I'm picking though the iso right now. I'll let you know what turns up. The
> install works fine other than looking for disk/by-label/ARCH_201603.
Oh my God, what moron forgot and left the 201603 install CD in the CD drive a
coup
On 10/10/2016 06:29 PM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote:
> You could try to inspect the boot entry. If I recall correctly the
> install iso uses grub so you can check and edit the entry before booting.
>
> If indeed the boot entries are not correct then you should file a bug
> report.
Thanks
On 10-10-2016 23:49, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 03:26 PM, LoneVVolf wrote:
>> Check these 2 options in the AMI Bios :
>>
>> Advanced Chipset Control > Northbridge
>> Set IOMMU MODE to 1 GB
>> (unless you have an agp videocard in this system, then it should be set to
>> "AGP
>> present"
On 10/10/2016 03:26 PM, LoneVVolf wrote:
> Check these 2 options in the AMI Bios :
>
> Advanced Chipset Control > Northbridge
> Set IOMMU MODE to 1 GB
> (unless you have an agp videocard in this system, then it should be set to
> "AGP
> present" )
>
>
> Processor & Clock Options
> Set Secure
On 10-10-16 20:30, David C. Rankin wrote:
This particular box is an older
SuperMicro H8DME-2 board with a pair of quad-core Opterons.
I just realised I have a similar motherboard (Supermicro H8DAE-2 ) with
the same chipset and also a pair of quadcore opterons on it.
Check these 2 options in
On 09/21/2016 05:43 AM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote:
> Have you tried with the latest install ISO?
>
Yes, that was my first attempt.
> You also seem to have physical access to the hardware, any special
> reason why you have to use optical media instead of a usb flash drive?
No, no rea
Beleza k
--
Caio A. G. Prado
URBANA LEGIO OMNIA VINCIT
“The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don’t.”
(Douglas Adams)
On Oct 10, 2016 5:47 AM, "SET" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since today's update installing qt5-webengine-5.7.0-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz,
> no
> mail content can be view
On 10 October 2016 at 08:47, SET wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since today's update installing qt5-webengine-5.7.0-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz, no
> mail content can be viewed in kmail. Reverting to 5.7.0-3 restores normal
> functioning. A long list of errors is output in console :
>
> ...
> #32 0x7fe45aa61df9
> #
Hello,
Since today's update installing qt5-webengine-5.7.0-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz, no
mail content can be viewed in kmail. Reverting to 5.7.0-3 restores normal
functioning. A long list of errors is output in console :
...
#32 0x7fe45aa61df9
#33 0x7fe459eec2f4 QtWebEngine::processMain()
#34 0x
16 matches
Mail list logo
