[arch-general] ttf-dejavu putting files in the wrong place

2016-11-01 Thread Jagannathan Tiruvallur Eachambadi via arch-general
Hi The fontconfig for the package should go in /etc/fonts/conf.avail since I was advised to create symbolic links to /etc/fonts/conf.d/ to enable specific features. If this is not the case, the wiki needs to be updated. Thanks guys! Regards Jagan

[arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Hello, cannot update packages, as ttf-dejavu has conflicts. --- Output --- Fehler: Konnte den Vorgang nicht durchführen (In Konflikt stehende Dateien) ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf existiert im Dateisystem ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Christian Klaue
See the website for tips on how to update: https://www.archlinux.org/ne ws/ttf-dejavu-237-will-require-forced-upgrade/ pacman -S --force ttf-deja ente On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 09:47 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > Hello, > > cannot update packages, as ttf-dejavu has conflicts. > > > ---

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread matthew dyer via arch-general
Morning. Try this, sudo pacman -Syu --force. Worked for me thismorning after this was sugested to me by someone on the sonar support list and worked with my machine. HTH. Matthew On 11/01/2016 04:47 AM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Hello, cannot update packages, as ttf-dejavu has conflicts

Re: [arch-general] ensuring integrity of sources (was: [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources)

2016-11-01 Thread Bennett Piater
> Any PKGBUILD kept in git can already optionally have this feature. See > git-commit(1), specifically, its --gpg-sign option. I know that, I have [commit] gpgsign = true in my ~/.gitconfig. It would be nice if more people did that and if makepkg checked that, though. It would probabl

Re: [arch-general] ensuring integrity of sources (was: [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources)

2016-11-01 Thread Bennett Piater
On 11/01/2016 12:40 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > I would like some bourbon. > > Allan I like your sense of humor :) > > * It might appear unrelated, but I can spend time on pacman/makepkg if I > don't have to work for bourbon. Then again, bourbon reduces the quality > of my coding after a point...

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Thank You. At some time I've subscribed to the arch linux update feed, but it doesn't seem very useful, so I'll remove it: 1. It seems not all updates are reported 2. It doesn't show any hints - just like this Do You probably know of any other more useful feed(s)? Kind regards Peter Am 01.11

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Thank You! Regards, Peter Am 01.11.2016 um 12:23 schrieb matthew dyer via arch-general: Morning. Try this, sudo pacman -Syu --force. Worked for me thismorning after this was sugested to me by someone on the sonar support list and worked with my machine. HTH. Matthew On 11/01/2016 04:4

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Chris Warrick via arch-general
On 1 November 2016 at 13:28, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > Thank You. At some time I've subscribed to the arch linux update feed, but > it doesn't seem very useful, so I'll remove it: > > 1. It seems not all updates are reported > 2. It doesn't show any hints - just like this > > Do You probably know o

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Christian Klaue
I subscribed to the Arch Announcement feed at https://lists.archlinux.o rg/listinfo/arch-announce You almost never get any mail (which I love). It's actually a copy of everything which will be shown on the arch website frontpage. Since I never had any trouble with updates besides those mentioned o

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Maxwell Anselm via arch-general
> Morning. Try this, sudo pacman -Syu --force. Please do not run that command unless the Arch site specifically recommends it. Forcing a full system upgrade is extremely dangerous. The safe solution is to force only ttf-dejavu.

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Thank You, subscribed it now :) Regards, Peter Am 01.11.2016 um 13:34 schrieb Chris Warrick via arch-general: On 1 November 2016 at 13:28, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Thank You. At some time I've subscribed to the arch linux update feed, but it doesn't seem very useful, so I'll remove it: 1. It

Re: [arch-general] ttf-dejavu putting files in the wrong place

2016-11-01 Thread Jude DaShiell
When I updated that package here yesterday, I had file conflicts and resolved them by removing from /etc/fonts/conf.d and then reinstalled the package. Fortunately I don't use fonts since I've been totally blind from birth and there aren't too many other authorized sighted people looking at my

[arch-general] Cannot start 0ad (libboost problems)

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Hello, when I want to start "0ad", I'm getting the following error message: /usr/bin/pyrogenesis: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_filesystem.so.1.61.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I've already tried to re-install boost and boost-libs. Kind regar

Re: [arch-general] Updates blocked by ttf-dejavu

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Thank You :) I wanted to do sth. similar as the Gnome tool in Java, so I tried the RSS variant, but it doesn't seem to be reliable. I'm using XFCE, so I wanted to have some tool in a language I'm using for software development, but it seems not possible, yet. So, of course, I'll have to do

Re: [arch-general] Cannot start 0ad (libboost problems)

2016-11-01 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 11/01/16 at 04:05pm, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > Hello, > > when I want to start "0ad", I'm getting the following error message: > > /usr/bin/pyrogenesis: error while loading shared libraries: pacman -Qo /usr/bin/pyrogenesis Also please report the 0ad and boost version.. > libboost_filesyst

Re: [arch-general] Cannot start 0ad (libboost problems)

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
/usr/bin/pyrogenesis is contained in 0ad a20-9 0ad-dataa20-1 boost 1.62.0-2 Should be latest versions, as updated this morning. Regards, Peter Am 01.11.2016 um 16:09 schrieb Jelle van der Waa: On 11/01/16 at 04:05pm, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Hello, when I want to start "0ad", I'm

Re: [arch-general] Cannot start 0ad (libboost problems)

2016-11-01 Thread Bruno Pagani
Le 01/11/2016 à 20:25, Peter Nabbefeld a écrit : > /usr/bin/pyrogenesis is contained in 0ad a20-9 > 0ad-dataa20-1 > boost 1.62.0-2 > > Should be latest versions, as updated this morning. > > Regards, > Peter File a bug report against 0ad in ArchLinux bug tracker. It somehow escaped the