Hi,
As some of you might know, the question of enabling SELinux support in
the official Arch Linux kernel package has been brought up a number of
times. The main issue that has been pointed out the previous time was
that enabling SELinux depends on CONFIG_AUDIT which is considered
unnecessary or e
Le dimanche 12 février 2017 18:43:22 CET Tobias Markus a écrit :
> I would be glad if Arch Linux's official kernel could support SELinux
> again this way!
>https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-March/035679.html
Thank you for the link you posted. I went through most of the discus
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 06:43:22PM +0100, Tobias Markus wrote:
> I would be glad if Arch Linux's official kernel could support SELinux
> again this way!
AFAIR, coreutils and many other things need to be rebuilt to support selinux.
--
Leonid Isaev
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 08:53:19PM +0100, SET wrote:
> Most users don't need SELinux/AppArmor or anything that protects them from
> themselves;
Not to nitpick, but given all the recent talk of things like gaping
Webkit vulnerabilities I think the benefits of adopting something like
AppArmor would
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Tobias Markus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some of you might know, the question of enabling SELinux support in
> the official Arch Linux kernel package has been brought up a number of
> times. The main issue that has been pointed out the previous time was
> that enabling S
5 matches
Mail list logo
