On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:38:24PM +0200, William Gathoye wrote:
>
>
> On 09/01/2017 08:26 PM, brent s. wrote:
>
> > You don't execute pam_lastlog.so directly.
>
> > As shown, pam is calling the pam_lastlog.so object (which is why you
> > can't execute it; it's not an executable, it's a Shared
On 09/01/2017 02:38 PM, William Gathoye wrote:
> I already did knew about this PrintLastLog feature but I wasn't aware
> this was PAM responsible of that (I thought this was sshd looking in
> wtmp or lastlog manually).
>
> Btw, do you know how to achieve the same behavior but on TTY or in GUI
>
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:26:24 -0400, brent s. wrote:
>it's not an executable
Good point! I was half asleep when I replied.
Anyway, the advice how to build with debug symbols could be useful for
the future ;).
On 09/01/2017 08:26 PM, brent s. wrote:
> You don't execute pam_lastlog.so directly.
> As shown, pam is calling the pam_lastlog.so object (which is why you
> can't execute it; it's not an executable, it's a Shared Object).
Ok. Actually, I saw this was a shared object, and I wondered this is
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 20:11:29 +0200, William Gathoye wrote:
>I cannot debug further since it hasn't been build with gdb debug
>symbols
Hi,
you need to build it and probably, not necessarily, one or the other
dependency yourself:
[rocketmouse@archlinux tmp]$ pacman -Qo
On 09/01/2017 02:11 PM, William Gathoye wrote:
>
>
> On 08/30/2017 12:19 AM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
>>
>> man 8 pam_lastlog
> For your kind info, calling pam_lastlog.so like described in the man
> pages is segfaulting on my side.
>
> $ /usr/lib/security/pam_lastlog.so
>
On 08/30/2017 12:19 AM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
>
> man 8 pam_lastlog
For your kind info, calling pam_lastlog.so like described in the man
pages is segfaulting on my side.
$ /usr/lib/security/pam_lastlog.so
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I cannot debug further since it hasn't
7 matches
Mail list logo
