On 05/13/2018 08:11 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:19:19PM +0200, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
>> On 13 May 2018 at 20:11, Neven Sajko wrote:
>>> I do agree that using md5 is absurd, ...
>>
>> To clarify, md5 *is* unsecure and is
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:19:19PM +0200, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
> On 13 May 2018 at 20:11, Neven Sajko wrote:
> > I do agree that using md5 is absurd, ...
>
> To clarify, md5 *is* unsecure and is even slower or not significantly
> faster than hashes from the
On 13 May 2018 at 20:11, Neven Sajko wrote:
> I do agree that using md5 is absurd, ...
To clarify, md5 *is* unsecure and is even slower or not significantly
faster than hashes from the Keccak and BLAKE2 families; using
signatures would be a plus but signatures are not an
I do agree that using md5 is absurd, but putting effort into using
sha-2 seems like a waste when Keccak and BLAKE2 are both faster and
more secure than the old hashes.
Regards,
Neven
4 matches
Mail list logo