:
> I did not understand 90% of what Ali H. Caliskan said, and I cannot
> understand how someone can keep top-posting after 3 different people
> asked him to comply to the bottom-posting rule, but well...
>
> I just wanted to say that the example he gave reminded me of
> fruga
Perhaps I should start posting topless then :) Well Allan, if you can't see
the benefits of this, then I shouldn't bother mentioning the KISS
philosophy. Also, for instance, compiling gcc and gcc-libs would reduce time
and costs for the developers.
and what that is supposed to achieve?
> also expl
Bash can handle array of arrays, dependening on how you implement it. I'm
not that useful in that manner, since I've applied on python.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Daenyth Blank
> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:32, Ali H. Caliskan
> wrote:
> > depends
'dri2proto=2.1')
url="http://mesa3d.sourceforge.net";
license=('custom')
options=(!makeflags)
source=(
ftp://ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/${pkgver}/MesaLib-${pkgver}.tar.bz2
ftp://ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/${pkgver}/MesaDemos-${pkgver}.tar.bz2
ftp://ftp.archlinux
that pkg1 is the head section, while pkg2, pkg3 is subsection of the
build. I've implemented this concept with python, and it works.
1:
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/mesa/repos/extra-x86_64/PKGBUILD?revision=51142&view=markup
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
why not use the same pkginfo with variables for both packages while using
separate build section, which is the subbuild for sub packages.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:58:48 +0200
> schrieb Damjan Georgievski :
>
> > I've been looking for documentat
well it's certainly the way to go, unfortunately I'm occupied with some
pythonic endevours right now. I let the master speak for himself.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Antonio de la Rosa wrote:
> Ali H. Caliskan escribió:
>
>> ...says the "sweet talker" wh
...says the "sweet talker" who knows what he talks about. Why don't you
patch your fracking mount as you patch the PKGBUILDS!
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Ali H. Caliskan schrieb:
>
>> Well, I'm not a Chakra or kde user but I can s
Well, I'm not a Chakra or kde user but I can say that I quite familiar with
the PKGBUILDS of core and extra packages, and needless to say, it's not
always consistent most of the times. So stop blaming others and work your
ass off when required!
/ali
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Thomas Bächler
site cok iyi görüküyor, bol sanslar!
/ali
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Alper KANAT wrote:
> Hey There,
>
> I, as one of the members of the Arch Linux Turkish Community, want to
> present you our new website on http://www.archlinux.org.tr ! To have such
> an
> address we have also co-op'd wi
Hello fellow Arch Linux devels and users,
I'm wondering if it's inappropriate to use "mkdir -p" in PKGBUILD instead of
"install". I've seen quite many official PKGBUILDs that use mkdir instead of
install, whose very structure I've adopted and applied in my various
PKBUILDs. Does it matter if it's
, hopping to explain my
arguments clearly as possible.
Regards,
Ali
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Biru Ionut wrote:
> Ali H. Caliskan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
>> goes by. However, during th
Thank you for your clarification, and I do not mean to create "beasts of
burden" out of you guys :)
Kind regards,
Ali
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Ali H. Caliskan
> wrote:
> > Well, I didn't intend to up
I agree with you completely. I'm not saying that Arch is unstable or stable,
but rather talking about rolling release concept in snapshot release. It's
good to know that there are people to seek help for this kind of project. I
mean if I was a developer, I certainly would be doing stuff than writin
thanks for the wiki link, it's good to know that some has tried to implement
the ideas, which I didn't know existed at all.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ali H. Caliskan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> &
I'm sick of this Debian comparison, I'm infakt a former debian user for 8
years, so I know that it's not all abou this.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mike Sampson wrote:
> I have found Arch very stable even with a rolling release system though I
> don't run KDE or Gnome. One cause of issues
g what you're saying though :)
/ali
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ali H. Caliskan
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've be
Hi,
I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
personally think Arch is stable and well maintained compared to other big
Hi,
I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
personally think Arch is stable and well maintained compared to other big
19 matches
Mail list logo
