On 12/04/17 20:09, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> Allan McRae writes:
>
>> On 12/04/17 19:33, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>> I'm just curious what the reason is.
>>
>> Because absolutely everything should link to the wide character version.
>
> Wouldn&#
On 12/04/17 19:33, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I'm just curious what the reason is.
>
Because absolutely everything should link to the wide character version.
> Oh, and yes, it does cause some problems:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53598
Stupid software is stupid.
A
On 03/04/17 08:17, João Miguel via arch-general wrote:
>>> I found this old bug report (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31594)
>>> regarding this, but there's no decision about it.
> Note: if this is really not worth anyone's time, this should be closed
> as WONTFIX.
That bug is about a completely
On 08/03/17 08:14, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 03/07/2017 05:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:18:19 +0100, LoneVVolf wrote:
>>> On 07-03-17 21:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:00:18 +0100, Carlchristian Eckert wrote:
> As a workaround, have y
On 07/03/17 23:09, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> One solution I could think of is an alternative firefox package (not in AUR)
> that still allows users to make their own
> choice. Would that be a possibility?
No.
On 07/03/17 18:29, jjgaris via arch-general wrote:
> Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken.
> This seems to be because pulse audio is now a dependency by default in
> firefox.
> However firefox can still be build with ALSA support.
>
> Without getting into any dicussion
On 08/01/17 17:11, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> Attempting an arch install tonight, and I get the following at pacstrap /mnt
> What was this caused by? I had to boot from the 10/2016 iso. Is it a change
> in signatures since then? I'll download a new iso and try, but I'd be
> surprised
On 26/12/16 22:12, NicoHood wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/2016 05:46 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:27 AM, fnodeuser wrote:
>>> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2016-November/028492.html
>>>
>>> i have a few things to add to this.
>>>
>>> the mes
On 16/12/16 21:28, NicoHood wrote:
> make sha512 the default
Hey... guess what is still not happening?
On 16/12/16 11:35, fnodeuser wrote:
> "With great power comes great responsibility."
> -Uncle Ben
I will not have misquotes on this mailing list!
On 10/12/16 02:05, NicoHood wrote:
> An official rule would be still better. So let us know what you (devs)
> think about this finally.
Been there, done that...
On 08/12/16 08:51, sivmu wrote:
> Am 07.12.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Allan McRae:
>> > ...
>> > I advocate keeping md5sum as the default because it is broken. If I see
>> > someone purely verifying their sources using md5sum in a PKGBUILD (and
>> > not pgp
On 07/12/16 19:58, Gregory Mullen wrote:
>> But we don't care about that... we just want to feel warm and fuzzy with
> a false sense of security.
>
> No one is suggesting sha*sum replace, and actual security/authentication
> check. Only that maybe it's not a good idea to use a system we all know
On 07/12/16 19:35, Gregory Mullen wrote:
> Grayhatter here, developer of Tox -- The security centered TAV client. No
> matter what the reason is, NO ONE should be using MD5. We can argue about
> what hash we want to use, but literally nothing, is better than using MD5.
> I don't mean MD5 is better
On 01/11/16 03:14, Bennett Piater wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 06:04 PM, Levente Polyak wrote:
>> On the other side we have a dev/TU authenticating the buildscript.
>> Both cover certain areas but are still independent and one does not make
>> the other futile.
>
> Since this thread is helpfully on arch
On 22/10/16 14:06, Alive 4ever wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 02:15:01AM +0800, Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Robin via arch-general <
>> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
I was curious why does 'pacman -Q' operations took longer
As the currently lead pacman developer... We will never have a sql (or
other) database backend.
When we did tests for the sync backends, using a single tar file gave
the same speed-up as using some sql variant (and we still have not
optimised any reading from that - for the sync "dbs", we always
On 03/10/16 00:51, David C. Rankin wrote:
> I wonder how Allan would view the matter.
The Beginner's Guide should never have existed.
A
On 23/09/16 14:23, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 08:19 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Anyone else who replies to this thread will be stuck in the moderation
>> queue (which no-one checks).
>
> I took this to mean that this thread got "locked" so
Anyone else who replies to this thread will be stuck in the moderation
queue (which no-one checks).
Allan
On 14/01/14 22:13, Damjan wrote:
> On 13.01.2014 22:52, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2014 22:48, schrieb Mark Lee:
>>> Salutations,
>>>
>>> All right then; if it works for you guys. Will an announcement be made
>>> on the arch website to ensure the upgrade doesn't break more systems or
>>> wil
On 13/01/14 20:57, Paladin wrote:
> Hi,
> does anyone know if there is plan to implement this:
> http://www.kali.org/how-to/emergency-self-destruction-luks-kali/
> in Arch?
>
> Patch https://github.com/offensive-security/cryptsetup-nuke-keys
> is not too big and IMHO it would be great to have this
On 04/01/14 01:03, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 03:23:24PM +0100, Thomas B?chler wrote:
>> Am 03.01.2014 15:21, schrieb Martti K?hne:
>>> You can't expect every upstream to fix their autohell to conform to
>>> our expectations here.
>>
>> So, we keep repeating ourselves.
>>
>> T
On 30/12/13 14:45, Peter Baldridge wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> The most recent upgrade to pcre 8.34-1 seems to disallow group names
> starting with a digit. A quote from the PCRE news.txt [1]:
>
>> "Perl no longer allows group names to start with digits, so I have made this
> change also in PCRE."
>
On 06/12/13 05:39, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> On 05/12/2013 20:10, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>>> [2013-12-04 15:00:31 -0500] Sébastien Leblanc:
I am kind of annoyed by the time it takes to update the MIME database
>>>
>>> Please, please, plea
On 04/12/13 14:49, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi
>
>> Exactly. AFAIK, we have no-one interested in maintaining apache-2.4.
>> I'm sure we could have apache22 and apache (2.4) otherwise.
>
> If no-one from core developers wants to maintain this package could
> you please move apache and modules to c
On 04/12/13 07:59, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 03.12.2013 16:37, schrieb David C. Rankin:
>> The 2.2->2.4 update represents a "major" update to crucial parts of apache
>> including:
>
> This is exactly the reason why the new version should be provided by
> Arch itself and not some "third-pa
On 13/11/13 07:41, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> * core/nfs-utils/nfs-utils.install:
>
> post_upgrade() {
> if [ "$(vercmp $2 1.2.0-2)" -lt 0 ]; then
> cat << 'EOM'
> ==> IMPORTANT NFS UTILS CHANGES:
> ==> This is a rather important upgrade, you are going to have to
> change config files.
> ==>
On 01/11/13 08:56, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> On 31/10/2013 00:36, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 31/10/13 09:36, Timothée Ravier wrote:
>>> Only packagers will be impacted as there are still some patches needed
>>> and this could slow down 'core packages' updates whe
On 31/10/13 09:36, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 01:21, Allan McRae wrote:
>> I'd suggest that someone maintains an unofficial repo with all the
>> packages required to set this up to prove the work required for
>> continual maintenance of this has been don
On 29/10/13 09:39, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering whether there was ever an actual discussion regarding the
> SELinux support within Arch. I could only find a bug report from
> September 2012 (see [1]), which was closed by Dave Reisner with kind of
> a lame comment: "A million times
On 29/10/13 08:43, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
>> On 26/10/2013 22:22, Carsten Mattner wrote:
>>> Yes but this was news to me and is unusual. So this should be stated
>>> clearly on archlinux.org or at least the wikipedia article.
>>
>> Please e
On 27/09/13 01:15, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just checked what was the motivation for this 5th release and I have found:
>
> http://hmarco.org/bugs/CVE-2013-4788.html
>
> where it says:
>
> The vulnerability is caused due to the non initialization to a random value
> (it is
On 27/09/13 22:56, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-09-26 08:53, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> Some Arch packages even provide static libraries for convenience, such
>> as gcc and glibc. And unfortunately a few higher-level packages also
>> provide static libraries because their maintainers did not notice the
On 06/09/13 05:14, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> I asked about this before:
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2013-May/033590.html
> but now Dusty wants to make it official (or "official")
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=169356
>
> Some people didn't like the Official
On 23/08/13 19:36, Lieven Moors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what is happening with Arch Rollback Machine?
> The server (arm.konnichi.com) has been unavailable for more than a week now,
> and I'm depending on it to keep an offline machine up to date...
>
> Greetings,
>
> lieven
>
It has
On 21/08/13 00:56, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> based on the following forum entry, I would like to open this topic up for
> a wide discussion.
>
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1314594
>
Based on my comment:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1314755#p1314755
Do it your
On 15/08/13 17:08, Johannes Ernst wrote:
> I'm trying to understand what may and may not go wrong between package
> uploads to a repository, repository synchronization via rsync (which seems
> to be the preferred method for mirrors to get their stuff) and downloads
> via pacman.
>
> Assume a devel
On 14/08/13 19:21, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
> I am running [testing] on Arch Linux x86_64. With the recent update
> of glibc to 2.18-1, all vte-based terminals fail to start under a
> non-root user. They claim that "grantpt failed: Operation not
> permitted". Downgrading to core’s 2.17-6
On 07/08/13 20:46, lolilolicon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> I believe it possibly did in the past, but pacman chroots into the
>> --root directory before running any scripts so it makes no difference.
>
> That's great, seeing t
On 07/08/13 18:35, lolilolicon wrote:
> Many install scriptlets include the leading slash in file paths, e.g.
>
> post_install() {
> update-desktop-database -q
> gtk-update-icon-cache -q -t -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor
> }
>
> while some strip the leading slash,
>
> post_install() {
>
On 02/08/13 02:02, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Intro:
> Below are some questions / ideas I came up with. I simply don't know
> if anyone cares about these issues, whether there are rules or at
> least suggestions how to best deal with them or is it up to the
> maintainer.
>
> I've heard there were so
On 16/07/13 21:59, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, A Rojas wrote:
>> I thought it was deprecated in favour of netctl. Now it's impossible to
>> install the base group, since netctl and netcfg are in conflict.
>>
>
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/
On 01/07/13 20:11, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> I know arch-general si not for reporting bugs and I'm not trying to
> rush anyone, but it's been already a month of confusion wrt
> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/zsh&id=c84d9770988fdc0f2e6c7bd5fa748d5a18580fb
On 27/06/13 15:54, Star Brilliant wrote:
> After I upgraded to grub 2.00.5043-1, I found that grub switched back to
> English interface because the locale files are missing.
>
> Those locale files used to be in /usr/share/locale but it is not there
> in the new version.
>
> Is it a mistake, or th
On 24/06/13 01:39, kachelaqa wrote:
> For version 4.1.1 of pacman, a --noprepare option was added to makepkg
> [1]. But, for version 4.1.2, the option is no longer available.
Are you sure?
On 02/06/13 18:21, David Benfell wrote:
> I'm assuming I can't post to arch-dev-public since I'm not a developer:
>
> On 06/01/2013 05:34 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> 5) Update your system. # pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem,bash #
>> pacman -S bash # pa
On 01/06/13 23:36, Genes Lists wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 12:26 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-May/025026.html
>>
>> 3) Update your system:
>> $ pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem
>> $ pacman -Su
>>
>> It should say '#', not '$'.
>>
>
> I had a
On 01/06/13 23:40, Genes Lists wrote:
> On 06/01/2013 09:36 AM, Genes Lists wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> # ls -l /bin
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 593296 Nov 3 2011 mbchk
>>
>>
>> Suggestions for best way to recover from this?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> gene
>>
>
> Also grub is in /sbin
>
> # ls -l /sbin
> total 9
On 22/05/13 06:45, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> http://archlinux.me/dusty/2013/05/21/arch-linux-community-on-gittip/
>
> Does this initiative have the Uber Archers blessing? Does it need one?
>
> I recall that there were issues regarding the official Google+ page
> even though it was started by an Ar
On 08/05/13 08:10, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi, Allan
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> On 07/05/13 06:20, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 May 2013 16:01:30 -0400
>>> Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 07/05/13 06:20, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2013 16:01:30 -0400
> Eric Bélanger wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With gcc 4.8.0-4 I can no longer build core/links package from ABS,
>>> with SSL support. The issue is _not_relate
lots of computers, but they don't need debug packages.
>
>
> On 15 April 2013 10:11, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> DB size is not the only consideration. For example -Ss output will be
>> "polluted".
>
> Maybe it could be filtered on the pacman side, ie
On 15/04/13 18:59, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 13.04.2013 17:55, schrieb William Giokas:
>> All,
>>
>> With the inclusion of the debug option in pacman 4.1.0, I think it makes
>> sense to do something with this in the official repositories. I've
>> sifted through some bug reports asking for inclusio
On 15/04/13 05:24, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:14 PM, William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What I would propose (and I've implemented this locally fine) is to have
>> a separate series of repositories named [$repo-debug] that only contain
>> the -debug package
On 09/04/13 00:25, Damjan wrote:
> For various reasons I'm compiling my own kernels, but just now I have
> got this error while trying to update and compile 3.8.6.
>
> gcc is 4.8.0-1
> arch is i686
>
> How do I get "preprocessed source"?
>
>
> CC [M] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.
On 28/03/13 21:04, Robbie Smith wrote:
> Is there a publicly-accessible list to follow the development of
> netcfg’s successor-to-be, netctl?
>
> From my experiments with systemd and netcfg, there’s a few features that
> could definitely come in useful, and I’m certainly willing to help
> contribu
On 04/03/13 06:11, Armin K. wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 09:04 PM, Armin K. wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> First, I am aware that ArchLinux is against patching packages to
>> implement some features, but this might be worth the effort.
>>
>> Tom Stellard of AMD has announced a R600 backend patch against
On 08/02/13 14:14, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> So I'm checking out python-sympy for some calculations in the Robotics
> subject I teach and realized that a bug was recently fixed in git
> which is crucial to what I hope to use it for. python-sympy-git in the
> AUR and that's settled.
>
> Then I got to wond
On 24/01/13 00:29, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>>
>>> My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
>>> I have now /lib --> usr/lib
On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
> I have now /lib --> usr/lib and lib64/ > usr/lib.
> /usr/lib64 > lib
>
> Is this the expected structure after the upgrade ?
>
Yes
Give the complete package list of what w
Hrm... this got dropped to [community] so that there would be a better
response time to updates. Obviously it has not happened, so it should
be dropped.
I'll wait 24 hours...
Allan
On 31/12/12 05:26, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:54:14PM -0500, Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
>> I believe signatures are checked after packages are rebuilt from
>> deltas. Therefore, if your delta is compromised, the resulting
>> package won't validate with the signature.
>
> Exc
On 28/12/12 05:27, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Do these two features play nice together?
>
Why wouldn't they?
On 27/12/12 05:08, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm late to the party of signing packages and databases, but was a
> little surprised to find this statement on the pacman-key wikipage[1]:
>
> Although all official packages are now signed, as of June 2012
> signing of the databases is
On 18/11/12 09:59, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> the core/util-linux 2.22.1-2 has the following typo error:
>
> ( 26/130) installing util-linux
> [###] 100%
> install: invalid user 'uuidd'
> error: command failed to execute correctly
>
> so i have two quest
On 14/11/12 23:28, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> The current registration question for the forums is
> What is the output of "date -u +%W$(uname)|sha256sum|sed 's/\W//g'"?
> and for the wiki
> What is the output of "date -u +%W`uname`|sha256sum|sed 's/\W//g'"?
> so I guess the wiki is csh-friendly.
>
>
On 12/11/12 16:41, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Why are some bug descriptions truncated?
>
> Is:
> FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when used
>
> Should be:
> FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when
> used with LXDE
>
> https://bugs.arc
On 01/11/12 10:57, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:47:56 +1000
> Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> On 01/11/12 10:41, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
>>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:27:28 +1000
>>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/11/12 07:01, Joa
On 01/11/12 10:41, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:27:28 +1000
> Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> On 01/11/12 07:01, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:27:59 +0100
>>> Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you onl
On 01/11/12 07:01, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:27:59 +0100
> Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>
>> Do you only get this error with this particular package, or with
>> extra-x86_64-build in general?
>> Submitting this as a "support request" for the devtools package may
>> work out.
>
On 28/10/12 15:41, kendell clark wrote:
>
> Hi all
> I just tried to update my internal system with #pacman -Syyu tonight and
> recieved the following warnings from pacman.
> warning: binutils: local (2.23-1) is newer than core (2.22-10)
> warning: e2fsprogs: local (1.42.6-1) is newer than core (
On 21/10/12 17:28, gt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with the recent update of syslog-ng (3.3.6-2), systemd has been added as
> a dependency.
>
> I though systemd providing its own logging and syslog-ng wasn't needed.
> Then why is systemd needed for syslog-ng to run? As far i can see from
> the diffs, nothin
People just do not learn...
All post to the mailing list are now moderated. As this takes time away
from us actually maintaining the distribution, this will only occur
intermittently.
Allan
On 01/10/12 20:23, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, gt wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:49:05AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> On 01/10/12 11:21, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
>>>> Authoritarian and despotic.
>>>>
>>>> M
On 01/10/12 11:21, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
> On 29-09-2012 20:41, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 30/09/12 09:32, Heiko Baums wrote:
>>> schrieb Martín Cigorraga :
>>
>>
>> The replies by Martin and Heiko had not technical aspect and were not
>> asking for hel
On 30/09/12 09:32, Heiko Baums wrote:
> schrieb Martín Cigorraga :
The replies by Martin and Heiko had not technical aspect and were not
asking for help. Both accounts are banned for one week.
Allan
On 28/09/12 19:38, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> BTW, what a wonderfull attitude from you to non official people. Highly
> contructive and motivating. Thanks.
Thanks.
On 28/09/12 19:01, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 27/09/12, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>
>> Can you give some examples of discussions you would see moving to
>> archlinux-dev?
>
> Sure.
>
> Subject: [arch-general] Modifying archiso
> From: Robbie Smith
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:47:11 +1000
On 26/09/12 21:35, Allan McRae wrote:
> I am invoking the easy way to end flamewars...
>
> This mailing list will be shut down for the next 24 hours. Any messages
> sent to the list will go to /dev/null.
>
> Once the list is reinstated, I will automatically ban any person wh
I am invoking the easy way to end flamewars...
This mailing list will be shut down for the next 24 hours. Any messages
sent to the list will go to /dev/null.
Once the list is reinstated, I will automatically ban any person who
sends an email that is not asking for help or providing help.
Allan
On 26/09/12 20:39, Heiko Baums wrote:
> See also Denis' blog to which he sent a link in his last e-mail.
Fact checking needed especially since it was the developer you
were replying to whose blog post that actually was.
Allan
On 22/09/12 21:39, Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:37:26 +0900
> Zhengyu Xu wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 12:00 +0530, Aurko Roy wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Zhengyu Xu
>>> wrote:
>>>
Dear all,
After updating systemd to 191-1 in testing repo, I
On 22/09/12 18:42, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:18:49 +1000
> schrieb Allan McRae :
>
>> Medical condition?
>
> I'm very fine. Thanks.
>
> Do I really need to say PulseAudio and Lennart Poettering? And do I
> really need to say "made
On 22/09/12 18:07, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:09:02 +0900
> schrieb Zhengyu Xu :
>
>> After updating systemd to 191-1 in testing repo, I had following
>> messages during booting and the process was stuck (crashed).
>>
>> [ 10.539416] systemd[1]: segfault at 7d ip b75a97b7 sp bfb
On 21/09/12 23:36, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
> Hello. I noticed that libffado was updated recently. It looks like that the
> new
> version of libffado is incompatible with the version of jack in the arch
> repos.
>
> To demonstrate the problem:
>
> aapo ~ $ jackd -dfirewire -r192000
> jackd 0.121.3
>
On 21/09/12 18:03, Jan Litwiński wrote:
> When will Arch have more friendly installation program like Ubuntu,
> Fedora, or opwnSUSE. I installed Arch some years ago and it was very
> difficult for me.
>
Ha ha ha... best troll ever!
On 08/09/12 17:43, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 09:38 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 09:17 +0200, Laurent Carlier wrote:
>>> Le samedi 8 septembre 2012 07:23:18 Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
When an update today run ldconfig, I noticed that there's something
w
On 07/09/12 03:02, Krzysztof Warzecha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found dependency cycle in extra:
>
> libjpeg -> nasm (makedepends)
> nasm -> ghostscript (makedepends)
> ghostscript -> libjpg (depends)
>
> check_package.py script (one that sends Integrity Check to
> arch-dev-public) does not treat th
On 06/09/12 18:20, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:06:57 +0200
> schrieb Andreas Radke :
>
>> Pacman will detect the symlinks and break before the install scriptlet
>> will be run. So this is not an option.
>
> Did you test it?
>
> I'm pretty sure it won't, since I tested this before
On 05/09/12 00:03, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> pacman -Syu this morning and groupadd failed while installing git with the
> following message:
>
> ( 28/115) upgrading git
> [###] 100%
> groupadd: Invalid configuration: SYS_GID_MIN (101), GID_MIN (100),
> SYS_GID_M
On 31/08/12 20:44, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>>> IIUC the OP got issues regarding to networkmanager, while not switching
>>> to systemd.
>>
>> For the people not reading the forums: it seems the problem was with
>> the order of daemons in rc.conf, and should be unrelated to systemd.
>> For people not
On 31/08/12 09:48, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Cmnd_Alias EDITS
> = /usr/bin/vim, /usr/bin/nano, /usr/bin/cat, /usr/bin/vi Cmnd_Alias
> ARCHLINUX = /usr/sbin/gparted, /usr/bin/pacman, /usr/bin/pacman-color
>
> root ALL = (ALL) ALL
> USER_NAME ALL = (ALL) ALL, NOPASSWD: WHEELER, NOPASSWD: PROCESSES,
>
On 02/07/12 18:20, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Mon 02 Jul 2012 19:28 +1200, Jason Ryan wrote:
>> On 02/07/12 at 07:20am, Zero Cho wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your support. You're right. This is not intended to be a
>>> political debate, so I have been using a neutral word, Taiwan, rather than
>>> other mo
On 02/07/12 10:51, Andrew Hills wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> I have found a solution. All mirrors in countries with disputed names
>> are just removed from the official mirrorlist.
>
> I believe servers south of the Mason-Dixon line s
On 02/07/12 09:47, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
>> Gimme a break. These kind of political issues aren't solved by "taking
>> it upstream". Since when are politicians or people under the influence
>> of politics known for their outstanding adherence to lo
On 02/07/12 05:49, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sun 01 Jul 2012 21:23 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
>>> On Sun 01 Jul 2012 23:08 +0800, Zero, Chien-An Cho wrote:
Hello,
First of all, I am sorry to bring political issues to here. I have
>>
On 30/06/12 13:37, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 06/29/2012 08:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Just because the answers are getting more ridiculous
>>
>>
>> Open /usr/sbin/mkarchroot and change:
>>
>> mount -o remount,ro,bind "${working_d
On 30/06/12 10:58, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/29/2012 06:25 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> ...
>
>> error: cannot remove file '/sys/': Read-only file system
>> error: could not commit transaction
>> error: failed to commit transaction (transaction aborted)
>> Errors occurred, no packages were up
On 29/06/12 16:01, martin kalcher wrote:
> Am 29.06.2012 07:58, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> "Ignoring upgrade from perl-datetime-format-strptime from 1.51-1
>>> to 1.5000-1"
>>>
>>> No complai
1 - 100 of 680 matches
Mail list logo
