On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:50:02AM +0100, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > I'm sorry if it has already been discussed here, but I couldn't find
> > anything with the keywords I was using. I even had a bad time choosing
> > this message subject.
>
> xrandr ?
>
> > I bought a new, bigger monitor to us
Hi all,
I'm sorry if it has already been discussed here, but I couldn't find
anything with the keywords I was using. I even had a bad time choosing
this message subject.
I bought a new, bigger monitor to use with my notebook. I've already
configured X, but sometimes I like to write on the tty (th
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:05:18PM -0200, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:53 PM, André Ramaciotti da Silva
> wrote:
> > I believe these aren't the 'other IPC mechanisms' they were talking about.
> > What about FIFOs and sockets?
>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:42:25PM -0200, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
> (...)
> 4. There are other IPC mechanisms
>
> Yes, there are. But I think that each one has some drawbacks too.
> CORBA, for example, is too heavy for simple use (Gnome developers can
> tell a good story about that). XMLRPC
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:54:10AM +0530, Raghavendra Prabhu wrote:
> One thing I don't understand here is - why people crib that package B should
> not have feature X. If you don't want that, ABS is for that. There are
> plenty of packages which have additional dependencies like that mplayer(like
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:36:15PM -0200, André Ramaciotti da Silva wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:16:46 -0200
> > schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
> >
> > > I know, I know, they always come back.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:16:46 -0200
> schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
>
> > I know, I know, they always come back. :P
> > My Arch installation is still in my HD, just in case.
> >
> > About disk us
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:49:19PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:13 -0200
> schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
>
> > I don't want to flame, but that's why I recently moved to Gentoo.
> > Arch is one of the best distros I've used, but w
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:31:37PM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 11/23/2009 02:24 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:49 +0100
> > schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> >
> >> Some depends are made for convenience, you can build the packages
> >> with ABS without those depends, if they don'
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:23:11PM +0200, Priit Kivisoo wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 9:14 PM, André Ramaciotti da Silva <
> andre.ramacio...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Thomas and Xavier.
> >
> > I just got a little worried though. Is there any reason for
Thank you Thomas and Xavier.
I just got a little worried though. Is there any reason for user_xattr not
being enabled by default?
Hi all,
I'm thinking of different ways to organize my files and xattrs seem a
nice, standardized way to do so (don't ask me exactly what I'm trying to
do, for I only have a slight idea).
The problem is: I can't use them at all. I'm using the default kernel,
which, according to /proc/config.gz has
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 06:15:45PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:54 PM, André Ramaciotti da Silva
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:06:32PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >> Sascha Siegel schrieb:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
&
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:06:32PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Sascha Siegel schrieb:
> >Hi,
> >
> >can someone tell my whats the reason for building the arch-kernel
> >with "# CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is not set"?
> >
> >Thank you!
>
> Optimizing for size sacrifices performance. Read the gc
14 matches
Mail list logo
