Re: [arch-general] btrfs kernel incompatibility?

2020-02-11 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:02 PM Simeon Felis wrote: > > > Am 10.02.20 um 01:22 schrieb Chris Murphy: > > You might just go straight to ARM, and try to mount -o ro and see if > > it mounts it OK. I think the error messages you got from Btrfs > > previously had to

Re: [arch-general] btrfs kernel incompatibility?

2020-02-09 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:12 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > Disk identifier: 9904ABA2-B9F8-4544-9699-9935CE8A7B1F > > > > Device StartEndSectors Size Type > > /dev/sdc1 2048 7814035455 7814033408 3,7T Linux filesystem > > > > --> (7814035

Re: [arch-general] btrfs kernel incompatibility?

2020-02-09 Thread Chris Murphy
ck dmesg before and after, or just use partprobe if available. 3. mount the volume normally (this time rw) 4. resize sdc1 to account for the slightly larger partition and match its mirror # btrfs fi resize 8:max /mnt You can use 'btrfs insp dump-s' on both drives to confirm they both have dev_item.total_bytes4000785960960 That's it. Unmount and go try it on the Pi. -- Chris Murphy

Re: [arch-general] btrfs kernel incompatibility?

2020-02-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 1:45 PM Simeon Felis wrote: > > > > Am 06.02.20 um 23:03 schrieb Chris Murphy: > > There's not enough information to know what's going on yet. My strong > > advice is to make no further changes (no writes) to either block > > device u

Re: [arch-general] btrfs kernel incompatibility?

2020-02-06 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:03 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > There is a gotcha moving Btrfs between different archs. "Btrfs sector > size", which is an internal Btrfs thing, not a reference to either > logical or physical sector size of the device, must be the same as > page s

Re: [arch-general] btrfs kernel incompatibility?

2020-02-06 Thread Chris Murphy
exactly the same number of bytes as dev_item.total_bytes. I think there's a bug somewhere, you've got two devices experiencing the exact same complaint and problem. The GPT thing might be a distraction, I'm not really sure yet. What do you get for: btrfs insp dump-s -fa /dev/ btrfs insp dump-t -t chunk /dev These are all read only commands. -- Chris Murphy

Re: [arch-general] btrfs kernel incompatibility?

2020-02-06 Thread Chris Murphy
y the latter number is bigger. There is a gotcha moving Btrfs between different archs. "Btrfs sector size", which is an internal Btrfs thing, not a reference to either logical or physical sector size of the device, must be the same as page size. Page size is 4KiB on x86 and I'm pretty sure it's 16KiB on ARM. So I wonder if you've run into an arch mixing problem (or bug). -- Chris Murphy

Re: [arch-general] systemd-zram generator

2020-01-16 Thread Chris Murphy
ridiculous and unwarranted. Is this sort response representative of the Arch Linux community? Relative newcomers, and first time posters, should expect this kind of hostility? I think it's embarrassing. -- Chris Murphy

Re: [arch-general] systemd-zram generator

2020-01-15 Thread Chris Murphy
across distributions, which improves user experience. -- Chris Murphy

[arch-general] systemd-zram generator

2020-01-12 Thread Chris Murphy
s implementation. Thanks, -- Chris Murphy