[arch-general] Booting ArchLinux with `initscripts` is now broken

2014-12-19 Thread Ciprian Dorin Craciun
Hello all! I'm in a little bit of a pickle, and I would like to ask for some help with my particular setup. I haven't switched to `systemd` and I'm still booting my system with the old `initscripts` `/etc/rc.sysinit` and friends (except this all the packages are up-to-date). Before updating `sys

Re: [arch-general] Application stability problems (kernel 3.1, Intel hardware)

2011-11-18 Thread Ciprian Dorin Craciun
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 18:34, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 11/18/2011 09:41 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote: > [...] > >  If I catch anything useful in the logs, I'll pass it along... > >  For your specific issues: > >>      Strange behaviour: >>      * Fire

[arch-general] Application stability problems (kernel 3.1, Intel hardware)

2011-11-18 Thread Ciprian Dorin Craciun
Hello all! I'm encountering some very strange problems with my ArchLinux lately... And I was wondering if someone has similar problems? Context: switched to 3.1.1 kernel, all packages are updated. I have a Lenovo X1 Thinkpad -- mainly everything is Intel based. Strange behaviour:

Re: [arch-general] Many official packages don't also provide static libraries

2010-09-11 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 21:06, jesse jaara wrote: > make a pkgbuild to aur for the tools, Now, how would that actually help me? (In the best case it'll just stop me from upgrading a package on which my tool depends... I still have to recompile my tool.) (And BTW the "niche or obscure"

[arch-general] Many official packages don't also provide static libraries

2010-09-11 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hello all! I've seen that a lot of official ArchLinux packages don't also provide the static library variants (only the shared ones). (See at the end for a statistic, but summarized almost half of them are in this case.) These static variants of the libraries might be pointless for th

Re: [arch-general] intel video & suspend

2010-05-07 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 21:32, Isaac Dupree wrote: > On 05/06/10 11:49, Sergey Manucharian wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> Regularly I put my ThinkPad R61 into suspend twice a day, and >> everything worked perfectly until 2.6.32 and 2.6.33 kernels. >> >> Now from time to time (≈ once a week) when I wa

Re: [arch-general] Startup scripts

2010-01-17 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 18/01/2010 12:42 πμ, Tom wrote: >>> >>> That code is here: >>> >>> http://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/tree/rc.sysinit?id=2009.08-1#n266 >>> >>> Looks correct to me. >> >> Thanks, >> >> but then it doesn't skip fsck when hitt

Re: [arch-general] [OT] What is wrong with DBus anyway?

2009-12-03 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Felipe Tanus wrote: >>       Aaron didn't give any tech reason in his answear, and i don't >> think someone will do, except the one you already said at your first >> e-mail(no network). People who don

Re: [arch-general] gcc -m64

2009-11-07 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Xavier wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:14 AM,

Re: [arch-general] gcc -m64

2009-11-07 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Xavier wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun >>> wrote: >>>> >>>&

Re: [arch-general] gcc -m64

2009-11-07 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Xavier wrote: > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun > wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase >> wrote: >>> Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >>>> >>>>    Hello all! >>

Re: [arch-general] gcc -m64

2009-11-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >> >>    Hello all! >> >>    I have ArchLinux i686 version, but I'm trying to compile an x86_64 >> kernel... And you've guessed... Not supported by the ArchLinux st

Re: [arch-general] Encrypted ram disk?

2009-10-28 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Tamir Daniely wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Karol Babioch wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> after setting up a full system encryption, which works just fine >> basically, I know want to create a ram disk. >> >> I though that /tmp could be outsourced to a ram dis

Re: [arch-general] makepkg git download agent

2009-10-19 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Xavier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:25, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun >> wrote: >>>    Hello all! >>> >>>    Just a small question: is there somewhare a do

[arch-general] makepkg git download agent

2009-10-19 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hello all! Just a small question: is there somewhare a download agent for makepkg that uses Git? Thanks, Ciprian.

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux installation only with pacman

2009-10-14 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Thank you all for your feedback! I'm more confident now that I can just ignore those errors. One observation though: having dev, proc, and sys mounted in the new chroot, wouldn't it misslead the scriptlets? Because these special files would be from the live host machine, and not the guest

[arch-general] Arch Linux installation only with pacman

2009-10-14 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hello all! I remember looking at the installation script about one year ago, and all it had done (to install the base packages), was to use pacman. Now if I try to use the same procedure now (or what I remember from it), I get a lot of errors from the install hooks (script-lets). I've trie

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-11 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
rian. On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >    Hello all! > >    I'm having the following issue: after opening and closing some > shells within the same screen session, I'm left with a bunch of > defunct bash processes, that screen doesn't

Re: [arch-general] Pkg dependency tool

2009-10-08 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Florian Pritz wrote: > > Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >>     Is there any tool that would tell me all the direct or indirect >> dependencies of a package or set of pagkages? >>     (Something like http://alioth.debian.org/~fjp/debtree/

[arch-general] Pkg dependency tool

2009-10-08 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hello all! Is there any tool that would tell me all the direct or indirect dependencies of a package or set of pagkages? (Something like http://alioth.debian.org/~fjp/debtree/ but only with textual output.) Thanks, Ciprian.

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Tue 06 Oct 2009 18:40 +0300, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, David Houston wrote: >> > I Wonder weather it is your screen augments. Try using just -r rather than >&

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
tach and > reattach once in X. > > It sounds like a variable is wonky somewhere... > > Dave > - > r...@crankyadmin.net > cra...@archlinux.us > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:33

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, David Houston wrote: > I Wonder weather it is your screen augments. Try using just -r rather than -RR > > Dave > - > r...@crankyadmin.net > cra...@archlinux.us > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Crac

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun > wrote: >>    Hello all! >> >>    I'm having the following issue: after opening and closing some >> shells within the same screen session, I

[arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hello all! I'm having the following issue: after opening and closing some shells within the same screen session, I'm left with a bunch of defunct bash processes, that screen doesn't seem to wait for... Is there any issue with screen? Or is there any issue in general, as Firefox plugin

Re: [arch-general] ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues

2009-09-16 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Tom K wrote: > Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >> >>    Hello all! >> >>    During my installation trials for ArchLinux 2009.02, I've stumbled >> upon some issues that I describe below. >> > > Why are you usi

[arch-general] ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues

2009-09-16 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hello all! During my installation trials for ArchLinux 2009.02, I've stumbled upon some issues that I describe below. First one (the most minor and insignificant one), is that when you login as root in the installation system, it says as MOTD that you should read the documentation fou