On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 10.11.2014 12:37, Allan McRae wrote:
> > I think this is something we need to bring on board as an official
> > project at some stage!
>
> +1, I'd love to see this data get merged into our main site (especially
> a "not-building" table in
Only very minor updates, very few strings have changed.
More info: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
Transifex page: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-3/
Due by: 2012-04-02
Thanks!
-Dan
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> More info: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
> Transifex page: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-2/
Unfortunately Transifex still doesn't do validation quite right on
strings and newlines
More info: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
Transifex page: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-2/
Thanks!
-Dan
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Dan -
>
> Forgive me emailing you directly - I follow the list but am not able
> to post on it - and the reject suggested a direct email - and yours was
> last post when I replied.
>
> If this is wrong etiquette I'm sorry (new to arch ...
I'd like to release 4.0.1 later this week. String changes are very
minimal if you were up to date before; 3 new ones in pacman scripts
and 2 capitalization changes in pacman.
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-1/
Languages below could use some love if anyone is interested
If you've helped us out before, or are looking to get involved, the
string freeze for the magic 4.0 release is now in effect.
Translators: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
Transifex release page:
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-0/
I've set the dead
You don't need to be as daring this time- we've had some 246 commits
since RC1. The most relevant changes is signing is about 95%
functional at this point- see directions below the links.
* pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
* pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.o
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:08:15AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Fix FS#25002 (add net-tools dep for now), FS#23452 (fix path, add
>> optdepend) and FS#25095 (add supplied patch).
>>
>> Please sign off.
>>
>> I also want to mention that I d
If you are interested in updating any translations before I release
this maint version early next week, please do so:
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/3-5-3/
Thanks!
-Dan
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 30 April 2011 04:26, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Eric Bélanger
>> wrote:
>>> 2- The report for large packages should list the sizes in MB instead of
>>> bytes.
>>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> This is a message to all past/present/future translators that I'd like
> to do the pacman 3.5.2 release around the end of this week, so if you
> could take a look at the translations and get them up to date that
> would
This is a message to all past/present/future translators that I'd like
to do the pacman 3.5.2 release around the end of this week, so if you
could take a look at the translations and get them up to date that
would be great:
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/3-5-2/
There are o
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> We're using transifex this time around, and going cold turkey, so I
> won't even look at translations submitted here.
>
> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/doc/translation-help.txt
>
> The transifex
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sun 27 Feb 2011 12:01 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> > On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Major upstream update.
>>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:31 AM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> I know I'm crossposting this, but this rather belongs to arch-general
>> than to aur-general.
>>
>> Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
>> schrieb Kaiting Chen :
>>
>>> I think it's kind of
On Friday, November 12, 2010, Allan McRae wrote:
> Surely someone can run a git bisect on this issue. It is a reasonably new
> occurrence.
>
> Or are we just going to switch software every time a bug is found...
But I want my bikeshed to be red!
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Steve Holmes wrote:
> I just downloaded the latest 9.01 version of postgresql-docs which
> supposedly should contain the html documentation for postgresql.
> Alas, the package size is less than 1 K and when installed, a
> pacman -Qql
> only reveals some man direct
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 21.10.2010 15:56, schrieb Auguste Pop:
>> I noticed this by compiling the package myself... When I sent this
>> mail, the web page was not updated and I saw an old list of files that
>> did not contain the .so file. I should have tried i
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Time to move on to the next rebuild! This time it is for db-5.1.
>>
>> There are the following soname changes:
>> libdb-4.8.so -> libdb-5.1.so
>> libdb-4.so -> libdb-5.s
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 11:45 AM, maxc wrote:
>>
>> There is an excellent post by Guido here, Hilton:
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2008-February/011910.html
>>
>> Guido seems to favor using /usr/bin/python3.0 or /usr/bin/python3
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 20 October 2010 07:25, Norbert Zeh wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> With the python upgrade from 2.7 to 3.1, I ran into the following snag.
>> gitosis from AUR depends on python and setuptools. Now, python =
>> python3.1 now and setuptools install
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> Community feedback welcome as well, but this is now in testing now
>>> that the Python rebuild has moved o
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> Community feedback welcome as well, but this is now in testing now
>> that the Python rebuild has moved on. Please let me know (good and
>> bad) how things are going
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Christian wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am learning more and more about Linux, but I would like to learn how to
> create startup scripts for my programs, any good resource? Where should I
> start?
> Many thanks,
> Christian
Startup scripts are pretty specific to each dist
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Andrea Scarpino
> wrote:
>> Ditt fo 8.4.4-5 IS NOT attached.
>>
>> :)
>
> My outgoing email definitely had it attached. Maybe it got filtered?
>
> Anyway, here's a link:
> http://pkgbuild.com/~heftig/pg.diff
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> Anyone experiencing any issues with bash-completion for scp?
>
> When attempting to scp a local file to a remote machine, and I try to tab
> complete the local filename, bash just hangs until I ctrl-c.
>
> Might be be trying to complete the
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Liu Yu Fei, Eric
wrote:
> My VPS is also on Linode.
> I have just changed my mkinitcpio.conf to
>
> MODULES="xen-fbfront evtchn xenfs xen-blkfront xen-netfront xen-kbdfront
> netxen_nic"
> HOOKS="base udev autodetect pata scsi sata filesystems"
>
> However, when ex
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:20:29 +0530
> Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:05 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu)
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Mike Sampson
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, jesse jaar
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Where can I read about new features?
>
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD - nothing
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman - nothing
man PKGBUILD perhaps...
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Angel Velasquez wrote:
> Adding required dependencies like south, markdown and memcached
>
> Signed-off-by: Angel Velasquez
> ---
> README | 7 +--
> requirements.txt | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/R
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Angel Velasquez wrote:
> Table main_mirror was renamed to mirror_mirrors then it fails at the
> time to re-create the schema
You're doing this completely wrong. Migrations apply sequentially. If
you can not build a database from scratch using syncdb, please let me
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:07:30 +0200
> Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>
>
>> > Anyway, whats the rush? They will change eventually. There should
>> > be no (or very few) $startdir/{src,pkg} in [core].
>>
>> As I already said at the beginning:
>>
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:47 PM, David Campbell wrote:
> If a package has no elf files but is not 'any', throw a warning saying that
> the package could be 'any'.
> ---
> Namcap/anyelf.py | 18 ++
> namcap-tags | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
I put a new version (8.4.4-4) of Postgres in [testing] tonight that
fixes quite a few issues and wanted to just give it a few days to bake
before pushing it to extra. Let me know if you see any issues with the
new package.
* FS#20556 - [postgresql] should be compiled with more options and
libs, fo
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan
>> wrote:
>>> I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
>>> For some reason pacman is superslow,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
> For some reason pacman is superslow, and I'm not allowed to create/use
> loopback devices.
> pacman-optimize takes nearly 5 minutes per run, no matter the last run
> was just a minute ago.
Unhelpful
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Two fixes related to configs that aren't using udev:
> - Don't remove md devices which 'standard' names on --stop
> - Allow dev_open to work on read-only /dev
> And fixed regressions:
> - Allow --incremental to add spares to an array
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> I threw together a man page for rc.conf based on info gleaned from the
> Wiki, rc.conf itself, and my own experiences. I offer it up for for
> adoption into the initscripts package along with comments, critcisms,
> and rotten tomatoes. The for
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Andrea Fagiani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A little background :
> when updating a svn package with makepkg, svn info gets called (in the
> devel_check function) and then the "Last Changed Rev" extracted from its
> output and $pkgver updated accordingly.
>
> However, whil
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:30:54, vous avez écrit :
>> Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:24:29, vous avez écrit :
>> > Le lundi 16 août 2010 14:10:10, Dan McGee a écrit :
>> > > Patches are a lot more likely to get l
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/communitypkg
>
> Currently all commands that send something to the repos are commented.
>
> - two seperate paths : monolithic or splitted package
> - script take care when arch, pkgver, pkgrel are redefined in
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 11,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
>> would be used by anyone directly. It mainly meant for collecting
>> rebuilds.
>
> However, it would have to
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Netanel Shine wrote:
> you can also download ArchLinux from Ftp protocol:
>
> ftp://mirror.isoc.org.il/pub/archlinux/iso/
>
> (not only through HTTP like the archlinux.org/download say)
>
> someone can update it please?
We have no contact info for this mirror. Can
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> This is a bugfix/stability release over 3.1.2
Signoff x86_64
m there go to
work seeing how the Django internationalization would work.
-Dan
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Netanel Shine wrote:
> So, do you need some help?
>
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Netanel Shine
>> wr
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Netanel Shine wrote:
> Why Archlinux dont allow translation of the packages part in the site like
> in the AUR?
No one has stepped forward to make it happen, and the very few of us
that work on the site don't see it as a priority.
-Dan
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 04.08.2010 13:28, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>>> it was reported and we have a patch available
>>>
>>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20353
>>
>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 08/04/2010 02:23 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM,
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Latest
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Latest kernel is in testing,
>> please signoff for both arches.
>>
>> I already have
>> .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
>
> This
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> I already have
> .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
This completely broke wireless for me on my laptop. b43 driver, i686
architecture. The wlan0 device would sho
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, vlad wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
>> On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
>> > Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
>> > "write_srcinfo()". This generates a file .SRCINFO - like the
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Sonntag 01 August 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010
> 16:46:33 +0200
>>
>> Heiko Baums wrote:
>> > I don't
> think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I
>> > agree with
> moving it to [core] but not
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:14 AM, b1 wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 11:06 -0700, b1 wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 01:50 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> > On 30.07.2010 22:27, b1 wrote:
>> > > ~~
>> > > Any help is greatly appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Benedik
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200
> Dan Vratil wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite
>> a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version
>> 2.1.13 from December 2009.
>>
>> Th
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Netanel Shine wrote:
> Hey again,
> thanks but i got this error:
>
> Unknown command: 'reporead'
>
> Type 'manage.py help' for usage.
No, it means you are doing something wrong. The app itself contains
this command. You're going to have to do some digging yoursel
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Netanel Shine wrote:
>>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:36:42 -0500
>> From: Dan McGee
>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] RSS feed - missing feature|problem
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Netanel Shine
>> wrote:
>> >
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Netanel Shine wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> My name is Netanel Shine, and a few days ago i began the process of building
> an israeli community of archlinux. I used a git clone to set up the main
> site. (like some other great projects file that archlinux git have to offer
2010/7/8 Lukas Grässlin :
> Hi there,
>
> since the update from pacman 3.3 to 3.4 it reacts really slow to a
> SIGINT (Ctrl+C) while syncing or installing a packet.
> With 3.3 it immediately stops.
>
> Not a hugh problem, but I would know why it is so.
I don't think we changed our signal handler a
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Here is a quick review on all these patches. I recommend that the lvm and
> crypttab changes get a decent amount of testing before these go live as they
> are the biggest changes being done.
>
> Why has this been removed:
> -if [ -x /etc/
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:33 PM, PT M. wrote:
> It's been a week since mercurial 1.6 released, extra/mercurial 1.5.4-1 is
> still in the repository.
OMG! Raise the alarm!!!
You do realize none of us are full-time around here, right? The
maintainer will get to it when he can. Until then, learn t
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
> Linas wrote:
>
>> I assume this ask to have GFDL & CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
>> wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by its authors. The
>> GFDL 1.3 gateway
>> expired on August 1, 20
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Victor Lowther
wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 5:55 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver
> wrote:
>
>> Le lundi 28 juin 2010 à 17:55 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský a écrit :
>>>
>>> Actually I see the point of doing this. Arch is a modern distribution
>>> with the newest software around so
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Victor Lowther
> wrote:
>> Questions, comments, flames, etc. welcome.
>
> why go this way instead of the other? (clarification why go deeper
> into bash instead of trying to posix-ify the scripts)
Because w
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 23/06/10 10:47, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package fil
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:27 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>>
>>> my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
>>> want _anyone_ other than upstream to make security de
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:33 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
> Initially, when
> I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
> came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:03:01 +0200, Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
>> This release will be moved to core after signoff, together with
>> linux-firmware, initscripts, udev and mkinitcpio. Changes compared to
> -1:
>>
>> Remove kernel26-firmware pac
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> I've created a Google Group here for discussion around creating an Arch
> Security Team:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/arch-security
>
> Please join it if you're interested. The reason for this group is in
> response to my rejected su
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Andres P wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> Upstream release, please signoff.
>
> Small detail,
>
> Optional Deps : fakeroot: for makepkg usage as normal user
> python: for rankmir
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey, what do you think about this way of verifying packages?
>>>
&g
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> Hey, what do you think about this way of verifying packages?
>
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>>
>> On another note, an easy but maybe a bit costly way to avoid any MITM
>> tampering to packages, is serve *.md5 files
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
>>How exactly is core and extra database populated?
>> Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of
> developers
> Packages are not build on developers computers but on build machines as
> explained here http://wiki.archli
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
wrote:
> Thomas Bächler (2010-06-09 09:47):
>> Am 09.06.2010 03:40, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Thomas Bächler
>> > wrote:
>> >> Our current process of initializing /etc/mtab is
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> On 8 June 2010 16:58, Dan McGee wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> > Forwarding to the public list is your best option; going to one
>> > developer is a good
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> Forwarding to the public list is your best option; going to one
> developer is a good way for your email to get lost.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Guillaume ALAUX
> Date: Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM
&g
#x27;t have any sh package that error sounds strange to me (I
have this "issue" on one of my packages in AUR)
Should we change these scripts so that they use bash instead of sh or
should we change namcap in order for it not to yield such error?
Thanks,
Guillaume ALAUX
On 8 June 2010 16
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Upstream update. Renamved from pkgconfig to pkg-config as has been done
>> upstream for some time now.
>
> This looks funny to me:
>
> $ pacman -Qi pkg-config | grep '^Provides'
> Provide
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Gary Wright wrote:
> 2010/5/24 Frédéric Perrin :
>
>> On a 64 bit machine, in « char *p; », p will use 64 bits (8 bytes),
>> instead of 4 bytes in a 32 bits machine [I'm talking about p, not about
>> *p which doesn't look like it exists]. Gary Wright seems to be sa
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I need a tftp client in order to reflash my WRT54GL I realised that Arch
> Linux hasn't got one in the main repositories. Normally "tftp" is part of
> Inetutils (http://www.gnu.org/software/inetutils/). Looking at the PKGBUILD of
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
>> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1
>> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has
>> indeed been added to the linux-firmware re
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> Currently my pc is a laptop. I don't use a wireless interface. I
> connect to the Internet via cable broadband with a wired Ethernet
> connection and DHCP... This id very reliable. I can usually disconnect
> the laptop from the Eth
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Mon, 17 May 2010 08:23:15 -0600
> schrieb Ignacio Galmarino :
>
>> ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
>>
>> x86_64
>>
>> Ignacio
>>
>
> Works for me. Probably as useful as your report...
Working fine for me too:
$
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Okay guys,
>
> props to Thomas for finding out the problem with the initialization of
> wireless cards.
>
> I built new images, dated 2010.05.16 (aka "final final images" ;)) in
> which this should be fixed, and which also come with updat
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:50 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Ran into a shock this morning when on one of my 2 lingering suse boxes
> updates
> replaced MySQL with MariaDB. After a brief bit of research, it seems that
> Monte
> (one of the MySQL devs) forked mysql into mariadb from
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych
wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 18:49, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> This new kernel just exports some additional symbols for aufs2 which was
>> updated to a new snapshot. This should hopefully fix some issues with the
>> .33 kernel and aufs. Related auf
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 30/04/10 01:29, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.04.2010 00:36, schrieb Linas:
>>>
>>> Thomas Bächler wrote:
We must have a system that allows pacman to automatically verify new
developer keys and revoke old ones ... even mo
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 19/04/10 16:50, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> Last rebuild in 2008 and upstream recommends building against current
>> kernel...
>> Fixed include path
>>
>> Signoff both,
>> Allan
>
> Anyone? User signoffs are good.
Signoff both.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Xavier Chantry
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply Allan.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> On 17/04/10 00:03, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what is the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:
>>> Ever since the openssl rebuilds moved out of testing, the package
>>> search webapp shows an extra copy of
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> Ever since the openssl rebuilds moved out of testing, the package
> search webapp shows an extra copy of ca-certificates in [testing] at
> the same version of the one in [core] now. This package doesn't really
> exist in the [testing] DB and the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi
> Util-linux-ng 2.17.2 Release Notes
Signoff i686
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 08/04/10 00:54, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>
>> On 07.04.2010 16:10, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> This would really not help here. Pacman does not directly link openssl,
>>> but does through libarchive and libfetch. Adding versioned libarchive
>>
2010/4/3 Ng Oon-Ee :
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed a new pulseaudio in [community-testing], do request for
> sign-offs for that come to [arch-dev-public] as well? Or the AUR ML
> (which I'm not on)?
Neither.
1. If signoffs are requested, a developer will always start a [signoff] thread
2. Packages in n
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 15:18, Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 14:20, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> I'm not super thrilled about this regression. Either way, I think we
>>> should probably add a
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> For some reason rankmirrors seems to really hate the arch-games
> mirrorlist. I don't know whether it's a bug or whether there's some
> sort of server misconfiguration.
>
> [r...@muspelheimr pacman.d]# rankmirrors -t archgames-mirrorlist
> Qu
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 00:38, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> Observe the ping using ping -c 100.
>>
>> If there is some loss in packets, you need to consult your ISP unless you're
>> using wireless transmission.
> 0% packet loss, and it's no
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>> Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
>
> Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
> Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
>
>> More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people w
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
