On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
On 10.11.2014 12:37, Allan McRae wrote:
I think this is something we need to bring on board as an official
project at some stage!
+1, I'd love to see this data get merged into our main site (especially
a not-building
Only very minor updates, very few strings have changed.
More info: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
Transifex page: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-3/
Due by: 2012-04-02
Thanks!
-Dan
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
More info: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
Transifex page: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-2/
Unfortunately Transifex still doesn't do validation quite right on
strings
More info: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
Transifex page: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-2/
Thanks!
-Dan
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
Dan -
Forgive me emailing you directly - I follow the list but am not able
to post on it - and the reject suggested a direct email - and yours was
last post when I replied.
If this is wrong etiquette I'm sorry (new
I'd like to release 4.0.1 later this week. String changes are very
minimal if you were up to date before; 3 new ones in pacman scripts
and 2 capitalization changes in pacman.
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-1/
Languages below could use some love if anyone is
If you've helped us out before, or are looking to get involved, the
string freeze for the magic 4.0 release is now in effect.
Translators: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/translation-help.html
Transifex release page:
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/4-0-0/
I've set the
You don't need to be as daring this time- we've had some 246 commits
since RC1. The most relevant changes is signing is about 95%
functional at this point- see directions below the links.
* pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
* pacman -U
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:08:15AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Fix FS#25002 (add net-tools dep for now), FS#23452 (fix path, add
optdepend) and FS#25095 (add supplied patch).
Please sign off.
I also want to mention
If you are interested in updating any translations before I release
this maint version early next week, please do so:
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/3-5-3/
Thanks!
-Dan
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2011 04:26, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
2- The report for large packages should list the sizes in MB instead
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a message to all past/present/future translators that I'd like
to do the pacman 3.5.2 release around the end of this week, so if you
could take a look at the translations and get them up to date that
would be great
This is a message to all past/present/future translators that I'd like
to do the pacman 3.5.2 release around the end of this week, so if you
could take a look at the translations and get them up to date that
would be great:
https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/archlinux-pacman/r/3-5-2/
There are
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
We're using transifex this time around, and going cold turkey, so I
won't even look at translations submitted here.
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/doc/translation-help.txt
The transifex help and the tx client
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 27 Feb 2011 12:01 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote:
Major upstream update.
Test well. There is no soname
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:31 AM, 甘露(Gan Lu) rhythm@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I know I'm crossposting this, but this rather belongs to arch-general
than to aur-general.
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
schrieb Kaiting Chen
On Friday, November 12, 2010, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Surely someone can run a git bisect on this issue. It is a reasonably new
occurrence.
Or are we just going to switch software every time a bug is found...
But I want my bikeshed to be red!
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Steve Holmes steve.holme...@gmail.com wrote:
I just downloaded the latest 9.01 version of postgresql-docs which
supposedly should contain the html documentation for postgresql.
Alas, the package size is less than 1 K and when installed, a
pacman -Qql
only
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Matthew Gyurgyik pyt...@pyther.net wrote:
On 10/20/2010 11:45 AM, maxc wrote:
There is an excellent post by Guido here, Hilton:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2008-February/011910.html
Guido seems to favor using /usr/bin/python3.0 or
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
Time to move on to the next rebuild! This time it is for db-5.1.
There are the following soname changes:
libdb-4.8.so - libdb-5.1.so
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Community feedback welcome as well, but this is now in testing now
that the Python rebuild has moved on. Please let me know (good and
bad) how things
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Community feedback welcome as well, but this is now in testing now
that the Python
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 20 October 2010 07:25, Norbert Zeh n...@cs.dal.ca wrote:
Hi folks,
With the python upgrade from 2.7 to 3.1, I ran into the following snag.
gitosis from AUR depends on python and setuptools. Now, python =
python3.1 now
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Ditt fo 8.4.4-5 IS NOT attached.
:)
My outgoing email definitely had it attached. Maybe it got filtered?
Anyway, here's a link:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am learning more and more about Linux, but I would like to learn how to
create startup scripts for my programs, any good resource? Where should I
start?
Many thanks,
Christian
Startup scripts are pretty
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Liu Yu Fei, Eric
hoveringnowi...@gmail.com wrote:
My VPS is also on Linode.
I have just changed my mkinitcpio.conf to
MODULES=xen-fbfront evtchn xenfs xen-blkfront xen-netfront xen-kbdfront
netxen_nic
HOOKS=base udev autodetect pata scsi sata filesystems
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Matthew Monaco dgbale...@verizon.net wrote:
Anyone experiencing any issues with bash-completion for scp?
When attempting to scp a local file to a remote machine, and I try to tab
complete the local filename, bash just hangs until I ctrl-c.
Might be be trying
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:20:29 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:05 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) rhythm@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Mike Sampson
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Vitaliy Berdinskikh ur6...@i.ua wrote:
Hi!
Where can I read about new features?
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD - nothing
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman - nothing
man PKGBUILD perhaps...
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:07:30 +0200
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Anyway, whats the rush? They will change eventually. There should
be no (or very few) $startdir/{src,pkg} in [core].
As I
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Angel Velasquez an...@archlinux.org wrote:
Table main_mirror was renamed to mirror_mirrors then it fails at the
time to re-create the schema
You're doing this completely wrong. Migrations apply sequentially. If
you can not build a database from scratch using
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Angel Velasquez an...@archlinux.org wrote:
Adding required dependencies like south, markdown and memcached
Signed-off-by: Angel Velasquez an...@archlinux.org
---
README | 7 +--
requirements.txt | 1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:47 PM, David Campbell davek...@archlinux.us wrote:
If a package has no elf files but is not 'any', throw a warning saying that
the package could be 'any'.
---
Namcap/anyelf.py | 18 ++
namcap-tags | 1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8
I put a new version (8.4.4-4) of Postgres in [testing] tonight that
fixes quite a few issues and wanted to just give it a few days to bake
before pushing it to extra. Let me know if you see any issues with the
new package.
* FS#20556 - [postgresql] should be compiled with more options and
libs,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com
wrote:
I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
For some reason pacman is superslow
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
For some reason pacman is superslow, and I'm not allowed to create/use
loopback devices.
pacman-optimize takes nearly 5 minutes per run, no matter the last run
was just a minute
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Two fixes related to configs that aren't using udev:
- Don't remove md devices which 'standard' names on --stop
- Allow dev_open to work on read-only /dev
And fixed regressions:
- Allow --incremental to add spares to
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
I threw together a man page for rc.conf based on info gleaned from the
Wiki, rc.conf itself, and my own experiences. I offer it up for for
adoption into the initscripts package along with comments, critcisms,
and rotten
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Andrea Fagiani andfagi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
A little background :
when updating a svn package with makepkg, svn info gets called (in the
devel_check function) and then the Last Changed Rev extracted from its
output and $pkgver updated accordingly.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:30:54, vous avez écrit :
Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:24:29, vous avez écrit :
Le lundi 16 août 2010 14:10:10, Dan McGee a écrit :
Patches are a lot more likely to get looked at by any of us
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/communitypkg
Currently all commands that send something to the repos are commented.
- two seperate paths : monolithic or splitted package
- script take care when arch, pkgver, pkgrel
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
would be used by anyone directly. It mainly meant for collecting
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee dpmc
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Netanel Shine netanelsh...@gmail.com wrote:
you can also download ArchLinux from Ftp protocol:
ftp://mirror.isoc.org.il/pub/archlinux/iso/
(not only through HTTP like the archlinux.org/download say)
someone can update it please?
We have no contact info for
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Netanel Shine netanelsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Why Archlinux dont allow translation of the packages part in the site like
in the AUR?
No one has stepped forward to make it happen, and the very few of us
that work on the site don't see it as a priority.
-Dan
to
work seeing how the Django internationalization would work.
-Dan
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Netanel Shine netanelsh...@gmail.com wrote:
So, do you need some help?
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Netanel Shine
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
This is a bugfix/stability release over 3.1.2
Signoff x86_64
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:23 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGeedpmc...@gmail.com wrote
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 04.08.2010 13:28, schrieb Dan McGee:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
it was reported and we have a patch available
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20353
Awesome, good to see
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
I already have
.35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
This completely broke wireless
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, vlad v...@uni-bonn.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
write_srcinfo(). This generates a file .SRCINFO -
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:14 AM, b1 fo...@b1online.de wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 11:06 -0700, b1 wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 01:50 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 30.07.2010 22:27, b1 wrote:
~~
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Benedikt
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sonntag 01 August 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010
16:46:33 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I don't
think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I
agree with
moving it
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Netanel Shine netanelsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:36:42 -0500
From: Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [arch-general] RSS feed - missing feature|problem
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Netanel Shine netanelsh...@gmail.com
wrote
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200
Dan Vratil vra...@progdansoft.com wrote:
Hi,
please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite
a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Netanel Shine netanelsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
My name is Netanel Shine, and a few days ago i began the process of building
an israeli community of archlinux. I used a git clone to set up the main
site. (like some other great projects file that archlinux
2010/7/8 Lukas Grässlin lukasgraess...@gmx.de:
Hi there,
since the update from pacman 3.3 to 3.4 it reacts really slow to a
SIGINT (Ctrl+C) while syncing or installing a packet.
With 3.3 it immediately stops.
Not a hugh problem, but I would know why it is so.
I don't think we changed our
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:33 PM, PT M. pen...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been a week since mercurial 1.6 released, extra/mercurial 1.5.4-1 is
still in the repository.
OMG! Raise the alarm!!!
You do realize none of us are full-time around here, right? The
maintainer will get to it when he can.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Here is a quick review on all these patches. I recommend that the lvm and
crypttab changes get a decent amount of testing before these go live as they
are the biggest changes being done.
Why has this been removed:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Victor Lowther
victor.lowt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 29, 2010, at 5:55 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver solstice.dhi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le lundi 28 juin 2010 à 17:55 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský a écrit :
Actually I see the point of doing this. Arch is a modern distribution
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
Linas linas...@ymail.com wrote:
I assume this ask to have GFDL CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by its authors. The
GFDL 1.3
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Victor Lowther
victor.lowt...@gmail.com wrote:
Questions, comments, flames, etc. welcome.
why go this way instead of the other? (clarification why go deeper
into bash instead of
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/06/10 10:47, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:27 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
want _anyone_ other than
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:03:01 +0200, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org
wrote:
This release will be moved to core after signoff, together with
linux-firmware, initscripts, udev and mkinitcpio. Changes compared to
-1:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk wrote:
I've created a Google Group here for discussion around creating an Arch
Security Team:
http://groups.google.com/group/arch-security
Please join it if you're interested. The reason for this group is in
response to
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
Hey, what do you think about this way of verifying packages?
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On another note, an easy but maybe a bit costly way to avoid any MITM
tampering to packages, is serve *.md5
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
wrote:
Hey, what do you think about this way of verifying packages?
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Dimitrios Apostolou
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net wrote:
How exactly is core and extra database populated?
Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of
developers
Packages are not build on developers computers but on build machines as
explained here
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
rogu...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thomas Bächler (2010-06-09 09:47):
Am 09.06.2010 03:40, schrieb Dan McGee:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Our current process of initializing /etc/mtab is
hackish
sounds strange to me (I
have this issue on one of my packages in AUR)
Should we change these scripts so that they use bash instead of sh or
should we change namcap in order for it not to yield such error?
Thanks,
Guillaume ALAUX
On 8 June 2010 16:24, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net wrote:
On 8 June 2010 16:58, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Forwarding to the public list is your best option; going to one
developer is a good way
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Ray Kohler ataraxia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream update. Renamved from pkgconfig to pkg-config as has been done
upstream for some time now.
This looks funny to me:
$ pacman -Qi
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote:
Hi,
as I need a tftp client in order to reflash my WRT54GL I realised that Arch
Linux hasn't got one in the main repositories. Normally tftp is part of
Inetutils (http://www.gnu.org/software/inetutils/). Looking at the
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1
and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has
indeed been added to the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
Currently my pc is a laptop. I don't use a wireless interface. I
connect to the Internet via cable broadband with a wired Ethernet
connection and DHCP... This id very reliable. I can usually disconnect
the laptop
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
Am Mon, 17 May 2010 08:23:15 -0600
schrieb Ignacio Galmarino igalmar...@gmail.com:
ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
x86_64
Ignacio
Works for me. Probably as useful as your report...
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
Okay guys,
props to Thomas for finding out the problem with the initialization of
wireless cards.
I built new images, dated 2010.05.16 (aka final final images ;)) in
which this should be fixed, and which also come
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:50 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Ran into a shock this morning when on one of my 2 lingering suse boxes
updates
replaced MySQL with MariaDB. After a brief bit of research, it seems that
Monte
(one of the MySQL devs) forked
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych
roman.kyryl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 18:49, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
This new kernel just exports some additional symbols for aufs2 which was
updated to a new snapshot. This should hopefully fix some issues with
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 30/04/10 01:29, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 29.04.2010 00:36, schrieb Linas:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
We must have a system that allows pacman to automatically verify new
developer keys and revoke old ones ... even more
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 19/04/10 16:50, Allan McRae wrote:
Last rebuild in 2008 and upstream recommends building against current
kernel...
Fixed include path
Signoff both,
Allan
Anyone? User signoffs are good.
Signoff both.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Ray Kohler ataraxia...@gmail.com wrote:
Ever since the openssl rebuilds moved out of testing, the package
search webapp shows an extra copy of ca-certificates in [testing] at
the same version of the one in [core] now. This package doesn't really
exist in the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi
Util-linux-ng 2.17.2 Release Notes
Signoff i686
2010/4/3 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I noticed a new pulseaudio in [community-testing], do request for
sign-offs for that come to [arch-dev-public] as well? Or the AUR ML
(which I'm not on)?
Neither.
1. If signoffs are requested, a developer will always start a [signoff] thread
2.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 15:18, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 14:20, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not super thrilled about this regression. Either way, I think we
should
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 00:38, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
Observe the ping using ping -c 100.
If there is some loss in packets, you need to consult your ISP unless you're
using wireless transmission.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason rankmirrors seems to really hate the arch-games
mirrorlist. I don't know whether it's a bug or whether there's some
sort of server misconfiguration.
[r...@muspelheimr pacman.d]# rankmirrors -t
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
you could also try a netinstall cd and enable the testing repository
in /tmp/pacman.conf. IIRC aif (the installer) uses pacman with that
config file, so it might just work, although i never tried it myself.
if you
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
a bug is reported even if it's invalid.
Seriously, present some examples here, this talking in the abstract is
stupid. We're all grown ups, no one
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski gdam...@gmail.com wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.
Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs
More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 02:15:32 Dan McGee wrote:
Inline them; that way they can be reviewed.
-Dan
From 7a5c0584a3ad2fcf14659f5028534887bf929cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, keenerd keen...@gmail.com wrote:
There does not seem to be a documented standard rsync command for
the mirrors to use, so I'm making all sorts of wild assumptions about
what a mirror's rsync is doing.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:20 PM, keenerd keen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:13:38 -0600, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, keenerd keen...@gmail.com wrote:
There does not seem to be a documented standard rsync command for
the mirrors to use, so I'm
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
vmlinuz...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
Hello all, my free time is over to stay in the bugtracker in this year.
In few days, I will start a new caeer math professor, I am really very
happy because it's something I always wanted to study, and beyond
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 05/03/10 11:03, Andreas Wagner wrote:
Hello,
I am thoroughly enjoying using arch linux so I have tried to register
for the Arch forums. I have tried several times but I get the message:
Bots are unwelcome here. The
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:51 PM, clemens fischer
ino-n...@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org wrote:
I could not find any decisive answer in either the man page or on the
web. Here's my question: in etc/pacman.conf, can I use entries such
as:
NoExtract = usr/share/man/man1/mkisofs*
NoExtract =
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 11.02.2010 18:47, schrieb Tomás Acauan Schertel:
# pacman -S testing/mkinitcpio
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (2): mkinitcpio-busybox-1.15.3-4 mkinitcpio-0.5.99.5-1
Total
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Brendan Long kori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/2010 12:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 02/05/2010 09:51 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The
xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM, clemens fischer
ino-n...@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating the pacman database about once a day. For the last few
days I always get this message:
too much happens:: Synchronizing package databases...
but everything works fine. I checked
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo