Re: [arch-general] USB flash installation medium in BIOS machines

On 2020-11-02 10:57:02 (+0100), Juergen Werner via arch-general wrote: > I started working on my old Laptop again, which is a pre-EFI model and > needed a live USB medium to do some repartitioning. I copied the > current installation ISO to a USB flash. When I try to boot with it, I > see the boot

Re: [arch-general] Archiso doesn't show prompt

On 2020-06-09 23:55:09 (+0200), Ricardo Band wrote: > I have a Supermicro server and since last month archiso doesn't work > anymore. > > The 2020.04 iso did boot fine but the 2020.05 and 2020.06 boots up but > doesn't show the prompt. I just get a cursor that blinks and nothing > more. When I

[arch-general] Hyperkitty, Mailman, Postorius

Hi all, As a followup to my mail on arch-dev-public [1] I've just moved hyperkitty [2], mailman3 [3] and postorius [4] from [community-testing] to [community]. If you're running your own mailman instance, you have probably already read up on what the python3 based mailman-core aka. mailman3 has

Re: [arch-general] rEFInd package being neglected by maintainer.

On 2020-04-07 12:54:18 (-0500), mike lojkovic via arch-general wrote: > rEFInd has had multiple versions came out, and the mainter has been > neglecting to update it for nearly two years. Is there an eta or talk > of changing the maintainer for that package? Pretty sure, it builds > find as an aur

Re: [arch-general] A few out of date packages

Hey Jude, On 2020-02-12 03:39:23 (-0500), Jude DaShiell wrote: > tintin-alteraeon can be added to that list since it no longer builds. this is the second time I've noticed you're bringing up AUR packages on arch-general. This mailing list is not about unsupported packages. If you would like to

Re: [arch-general] Orphaning some packages

On 2019-08-27 09:39:11 (+0200), NicoHood wrote: > I maintain a few packages that I do not use anymore myself. > to orphan those, as I currently do not have time to test them, > especially on major version upgrades. I want to keep the quality of our > packages and hope that somebody else can take

Re: [arch-general] talkingarch

On 2019-08-04 20:46:35 (+0100), adérito wrote: > I did not have jenux because I can not change the language to > Portuguese jenux. because I can't get into settings. Please stop spamming the mailing lists with these one line requests, or you will be put on moderation. You're opening a new mail

Re: [arch-general] [AURA] Problems downloading / cannot find artifact

On 2019-07-30 19:35:39 (+0200), Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > when I try to download freerct-git using aura (using "aura -Aw > freerct-git"), I'm just getting the following output: This question is better posed upstream [1] or on aur-general [2]. Aura is not an Arch Linux project. Also, makepkg [3] is

Re: [arch-general] Steam hard-locks my PC (amdgpu fault)

Hi! On 2019-04-13 23:40:23 (+1000), Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general wrote: > I've been having this problem for a while (since late 4.??) and it's > been driving me up the wall. Basically, opening Steam 9/10 times hard > locks my PC. I can still ssh into it, but the display is frozen and it >

Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

On 2018-11-10 15:23:38 (+0100), Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: > David, don't forget that the CoC also applies to TUs. There was a long > thread about this on AUR general. TIA Ralf I'm glad you realize that, but fail to see the relevance for the topic at hand. If your remark is supposed to

Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

On 2018-11-10 05:36:08 (+0100), Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: > mails to mail...@lists.archlinux.org [1] are rejected. > > I try to get in contact with the owner of one list, but don't get a > reply. > > Regards, > Ralf > > > [1] > "If you are having trouble using the lists, please

[arch-general] Removal of ssmtp

Hey all, I have just removed ssmtp from [community]. Apart from it being unmaintained upstream, it has known security issues (e.g. [1]). I highly recommend _not_ using and removing it, in the case you have been using it. As replacements have a look at `pacman -Ss smtp-forwarder`. Best, David

Re: [arch-general] Unbound

On 2018-11-01 10:51:31 (+0100), Ismael Bouya wrote: > > Find changed configurations: > > > > sudo find /etc -type f -regextype egrep -regex '.*(pacnew|pacsave)' > > > > Diff them (individually): > > > > sudo vimdiff /path/to/original /path/to/original.pacnew > > Note that pacdiff (from

Re: [arch-general] Unbound

On 2018-10-31 21:41:10 (+0100), siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: > Hello, > > when I start unbound Nameserver via shell then all work fine. But > since few weeks it start not with systemd anymore. You do want to check your configuration changes on update. Updates are not unattended processes! Find

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On 2018-09-23 11:56:11 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > There are no other differences so in conclusion I think it's safe for us to > leave logprof.conf untouched. That's good then! :) > I also recommend to backport upstram 'binmerge' patch rather than using > custom sed rules as it will further

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On 2018-09-22 18:38:14 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > > It's almost there ;) > > > > '/usr/bin/subdomain_parser' under [qualifiers] is still duplicated. Ah, the match was not good enough yet. Now it should be! > > I'm not sure if 'apparmor_parser' and 'subdomain_parser' under [settings] > > have to

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

Hi Geo, On 2018-09-22 15:13:20 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > After [0] sed rules are applied to all apparmor config files, not just > profiles which results in unwanted errors: > > configparser.DuplicateOptionError: While reading from > '/etc/apparmor/logprof.conf' [line 47]: option

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On 2018-09-21 10:53:33 (+), Gus wrote: > Have been running it for a few days, so far everything is alright. Thanks. That's good news! > Also, don't know if it should be done in upstream or not, but maybe > logprof.conf > should be modified a little to add, for example, /usr/bin/zsh in >

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On 2018-09-14 12:21:26 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > They called it 'binmerge' :) Hope this can be achieved for all profiles. > https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/commit/4200932d8fb31cc3782d96dd8312511e807fd09b > > I think this should fix issues with referencing filenames that you > mentioned.

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On 2018-09-13 20:52:23 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > > > > From: David Runge > > Sent: Thu Sep 13 19:51:49 CEST 2018 > > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > &

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On 2018-09-09 14:46:21 (-0600), Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:19:37PM +0200, David Runge wrote: > > FYI, > > I'm currently working on bringing the user space tools to [community], but > > the rule sets will require testing and possibly we

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On September 9, 2018 10:00:03 PM GMT+02:00, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: >On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 02:53:04PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general >wrote: >> Heftig retracted his initial willingness to enable apparmor because >he >> did not think it useful enough without the userland

Re: [arch-general] users memlock value

On 2018-09-02 12:14:51 (+0200), Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I wonder if it's reasonable, that a package sets an '@users - memlock' > value, since it overrides needed memlock values of other groups. Guess we can safely file this under "misconfiguration"?

[arch-general] Changes to jack/jack2 and realtime privileges

Hi all, as announced before [1], recent changes to the jack and jack2{,-dbus} packages (now in [extra] and [community] respectively) have made the previously shipped configurations obsolete and decoupled the audio group from acquiring realtime privileges by default when installing jack. The

Re: [arch-general] Thoughts

On 2018-08-16 18:44:24 (+), Yury Grebenkin via arch-general wrote: > My email address can be seen. I send the book personally. I'm sorry to inform you, that by sending mail to this mailing list your e-mail address will be seen by everyone on this list and everyone in general (as this is a

Re: [arch-general] systemd --user enable: Failed to connect to bus: No such file or directory

On 2018-06-30 13:55:18 (+0200), Tinu Weber wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 13:34:11 +0200, Bjoern Franke wrote: > > > Are you truly logged in as this second user for whom it does not work, > > > or just su(1)'d, etc? > > > > Erm, just used "sudo -u user2 -s" to login as user2. I assumed spawning

Re: [arch-general] Possible to "inherit" from a package?

On July 14, 2018 8:07:03 AM GMT+02:00, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:50:49 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:17:20 +0200, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >>>Just to add a build option, I wonder if there's a concept of >>>"inheriting" from a package build, so I'd only add

Re: [arch-general] nftables partially broken after kernel update to 4.16.9

On 2018-05-21 23:31:57 (-0400), Bill Sun via arch-general wrote: > I just updated one of my computer to 4.16.9. After update, the following > nft commands will not work: > nft add table ip nat <--- this one works without error > nft add chain ip nat prerouting { type nat hook prerouting

Re: [arch-general] Setting make options for aur-packages

On December 26, 2017 7:43:33 PM GMT+01:00, Zachary Kline via arch-general wrote: >Hello, > >Isn’t this what makepkg.conf is for? You can specify all the make >options you’d want in there. >Best, >Zack. > >> On Dec 26, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Jeanette C. via arch-general

Re: [arch-general] netctl multiple dns servers

Hi David, I refrain from using netctl. Currently I have setup that only requires systemd-networkd. For my server I use unbound as local dns and forward requests to several instances of dnscrypt-proxy. Unbound is not much overhead and is caching, so this could be of benefit depending on your

[arch-general] New mailing list for real-time multimedia (audio/video)

Hey all, Florian Pritz was so kind to setup a new mailing list for the purpose of discussing real-time multimedia (audio and video) on Arch Linux [1]. Whether you're running big productions or are just fiddling away on your favorite soft synth: Sign up! Best, David [1]

[arch-general] php 7.2/ nextcloud 12.x incompatibility

Hey all, just a short heads up: current nextcloud (forseeable until version 13) does not work with php 7.2 (out of the box) [1]. If you're running nextcloud, you might want to delay the update of (at least) the following packages: php php-{gd,apache,sqlite,pgsql,ldap,intl,apcu,xcache,mcrypt}

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

e a plan. Yes. But also: are you thinking of a separate forum? Could this not be better dealt with within bbs? >To add on... > >Presently we have TU interest from (in order of date of contact with >me): > >- David Runge (approached me personally, contacted me in the past with >contri

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

Hey all, On October 13, 2017 11:08:21 AM GMT+02:00, Antonio Rojas wrote: >El Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:35:21 +0200, Sebastian Lau via arch-general >escribió: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I can adopt few if they drop to AUR (of if I get sponsor to apply >for a >>> TU). >>> >>> Regards, >>>

Re: [arch-general] kernel bug in 4.13.3 related to wireless?

I've had some issues with a Compex WLE600NX 802.11ac / a/b/g/n miniPCI express radio card from 4.12 onwards. The firmware fails to load for the Qualcomm Atheros QCA9882 chip. Switched to an Intel Wireless 7260 miniPCIe card, but that also has a driver, that crashes repeatedly (at least it works

Re: [arch-general] Nextcloud installation problems

Hi, On 2017-09-30 18:04:38 (+0200), Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > Hello, > > I've got a problem trying to install nextcloud (I just want to try it out, > so I don't have any knowledge about it, yet): > > --- > >

Re: [arch-general] tmux/systemd: tmux user service exits on detach/logout

Hi Ismael, On 2017-09-25 10:16:26 (+0200), Ismael Bouya wrote: > > as follow up on this (probably not so interesting thread for too many), > > I have tested systemd 234 successfully. > > The weechat instance within tmux (or tmux itself) still ends > > sporadically, but not the main tmux user

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.11

Hey Rob, On 2017-09-13 20:40:14 (+0200), Rob Til Freedmen via arch-general wrote: > liblo is out of date - try liblo-0.29 indeed it is, but that's not the issue. I'm already on a -git version for development reasons (and switched back and forth for testing). Seems to be an issue with my specific

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.11

On September 12, 2017 3:59:58 AM GMT+02:00, Eli Schwartz <eschwa...@archlinux.org> wrote: >On 09/11/2017 06:11 AM, David Runge wrote: >> Hey Ray (and all interested), >> >> thought I'd share an updated PKGBUILD for Ardour. >> Please update to the latest version!

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.11

On September 11, 2017 8:10:04 PM GMT+02:00, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >There's not only the AUR package, asp is your friend, too. > >cd /tmp/ >asp checkout ardour >cd ardour/trunk/ > >edit the PKGBUILD's pkgver to 5.11 , don't worry about the checksum, >it's already skipped >

[arch-general] Ardour 5.11

Hey Ray (and all interested), thought I'd share an updated PKGBUILD for Ardour. Please update to the latest version! 5.9 is unusable, when working with OSC to control it (segfaults). I know there is some AUR package, but ardour 5.11 is a stable release and should therefore be in the main repos.

Re: [arch-general] Depends on foo-bar=10.0-3

Hi Ralf, On 2017-08-14 10:36:45 (+0200), Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Note! I'm not asking anybody not to do it like this! I only want to know > the reason for mentioning a version of a dependency, for packages from > official repositories, since I don't know any reason. IOW I only want > to learn.

Re: [arch-general] tmux/systemd: tmux user service exits on detach/logout

Hey all, as follow up on this (probably not so interesting thread for too many), I have tested systemd 234 successfully. The weechat instance within tmux (or tmux itself) still ends sporadically, but not the main tmux user session. So, in conclusion, whatever has been broken in systemd 233, was

Re: [arch-general] tmux/systemd: tmux user service exits on detach/logout

Hey again, On 2017-07-07 15:24:39 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > I got a very strange behavior with tmux and systemd on my server and > maybe someone knows a way around it. > > The way I start tmux is as follows: > Setting TMUX_TMPDIR to my user's XDG_RUNTIME_DIR and starting tmux

Re: [arch-general] tmux/systemd: tmux user service exits on detach/logout

Hey Andre Vitor, On 2017-07-07 10:53:32 (-0300), André Vitor de Lima Matos wrote: > Not sure if related, but try setting KillUserProcesses=no in > /etc/systemd/logind.conf > > https://askubuntu.com/questions/802189/how-to-run-tmux-screen-with-systemd-230 That is an Arch default setting

[arch-general] tmux/systemd: tmux user service exits on detach/logout

Hey all, I got a very strange behavior with tmux and systemd on my server and maybe someone knows a way around it. The way I start tmux is as follows: Setting TMUX_TMPDIR to my user's XDG_RUNTIME_DIR and starting tmux in a systemd user service [1]. I do the same for other things, such as weechat

Re: [arch-general] Arch Wiki Professional_audio

On 2017-04-27 22:52:30 (+0600), Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > Great to know there was a talk about Arch pro-audio in LAC! I think there > is a lot of information there that you can add to the wiki. I did a rewrite > once but as Ralf said, rewriting again can be quite difficult. Yeah, there will be

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.6 released - status on update

On 2017-04-26 16:09:00 (+0600), Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > Sorry guys really no excuse other than "RL". Some of the other packagers > did help to update a few of my packages but ardour seems to have been > missed, most likely because it remained in testing. I have updated and > moved immediately

Re: [arch-general] problems on installing grub on a new system

Hey Steve, On 2017-04-02 13:06:19 (+), Patrick Eigensatz via arch-general wrote: > Can you point out how you configured your system? (How many disks, how they > are partitioned) > > Do you install grub on an UEFI system? What was the grub-install command > you used? Yes, please, all of that.

Re: [arch-general] Mount point of MTP devices?

On April 2, 2017 7:06:59 AM GMT+02:00, Rijul Gulati via arch-general wrote: >I want to access android device (MTP) from terminal. The device is >accessible from file manager (Dolphin). This means it has to be mounted >somewhere (right?). You can also use adb

Re: [arch-general] Arch Wiki Professional_audio

On March 30, 2017 6:24:38 PM GMT+02:00, Grady Martin via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: >On 2017年03月30日 09時51分, David Runge wrote: >>I have some things to add. Did a talk about low-latency setups on Arch >during Linux Audio Conference 2015. >>T

Re: [arch-general] Arch Wiki Professional_audio

On March 30, 2017 8:09:36 AM GMT+02:00, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >Hi, > >the Wiki [ https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Professional_audio ] >opens with... > >"This article or section needs expansion." and a link to the >discussion, but I still don't understand what actually

Re: [arch-general] [mpd+ncmpcpp] mpd hangs when manually moving forward on track, or to nex track

Hey Javier, On 2017-03-26 20:22:58 (-0600), Javier Vasquez via arch-general wrote: > Hi all, > > If someone is familiar with mpd (user, non root) + ncmpcpp on Arch, > perhaps can help me out... > > Whenever I move forward/backward on the same playing track (f/b), mpd > just hangs, usually so

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.6 released - status on update

On 2017-03-16 12:26:36 (+0100), David Runge wrote: > On 2017-03-01 15:16:32 (+0100), David Runge wrote: > > Can we update to 5.8 [1] then? > > We're still at 4.7 in the repos. > PING Come on man... this is getting ridiculous. -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.6 released - status on update

On 2017-03-01 15:16:32 (+0100), David Runge wrote: > Can we update to 5.8 [1] then? > We're still at 4.7 in the repos. PING -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.6 released - status on update

On 2017-03-03 14:02:15 (+0100), David Runge wrote: > Oh well in case anyone's interested: There's a PKGBUILD and > ardour.desktop file attached to this e-mail... -_- Whoops, no attachments allowed. $ cat ardour/PKGBUILD pkgname=ardour pkgver=5.8 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Professional-gr

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.6 released - status on update

On 2017-03-01 15:16:32 (+0100), David Runge wrote: > Can we update to 5.8 [1] then? > We're still at 4.7 in the repos. > [1] http://community.ardour.org/node/14325 Oh well in case anyone's interested: There's a PKGBUILD and ardour.desktop file attached to this e-mail... -_-

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5.6 released - status on update

Can we update to 5.8 [1] then? We're still at 4.7 in the repos. [1] http://community.ardour.org/node/14325 -- https://sleepmap.de

Re: [arch-general] ownCloud vs. nextcloud

On 2017-01-30 21:11:18 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote: > You could make a bug report on our tracker under the community section Just did: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/52791 -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] ownCloud vs. nextcloud

On 2017-01-30 21:11:18 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 01/30/17 at 05:00pm, David Runge wrote: > > Helloes! > > > > I wonder what Arch's/Sergej Pupykin's position towards nextcloud is. > > It seems that ownCloud lost most of its developers to the schism > >

[arch-general] ownCloud vs. nextcloud

Helloes! I wonder what Arch's/Sergej Pupykin's position towards nextcloud is. It seems that ownCloud lost most of its developers to the schism introduced last year. This led to many apps not being (mainly) developed by them anymore and moving into the hands of nextcloud and/or being more actively

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5 - Was: What's with Ray Rashif?

Hey Ray, On 2017-01-17 23:39:10 (+0600), Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > Ralf, David > > Thanks guys for all the info you have been sharing, I got sloppy again > and went into full panic mode in preparation for my master's thesis > and subsequent defense (19th). Good luck! Thumbs pressed!! > I

Re: [arch-general] uwsgi-2.0.14-15 segfaults with php plugin

Heyo, On 2017-01-17 17:19:34 (+0100), Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/52406 thanks! Will keep uwsgi in the "to watch" box for a while then... ;-) > > the packager is a bit irresponsible Best, David -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc

[arch-general] uwsgi-2.0.14-15 segfaults with php plugin

Hey all, ran into the issue, that after updating from uwsgi 2.0.14-1 to uwsgi 2.0.14-5 (php plugin of the same version), all php based webapps make uwsgi segfault (tested with wordpress and stikked)! Something like the below will happen (including after reboot): Jan 17 16:24:20 frqrec

[arch-general] notmuch built with xapian-core from testing?

Hey folks, I'm getting a notmuch: error while loading shared libraries: libxapian.so.30: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory when trying to run the current notmuch. xapian-core is currently at 1:1.2.24-1 in extra and 1:1.4.2-1 in testing. I'm a bit confused by which

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5 - Was: What's with Ray Rashif?

Hey Ray, On 2016-12-27 01:40:15 (+0600), Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > > at the moment I'm testing a new audio interface. Ardour5 (not > > from the testing repo) crashed on my machine, so I'm using Qtractor for > > the test. Perhaps Ardour 5.5 not only crashes on my machine. I couldn't reproduce

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5 - Was: What's with Ray Rashif?

Hey Ralf, On 2016-12-28 00:37:16 (+0100), Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >Used it with jack2 1.9.10-6 > Strange, the version of jack2 you are using is known to cause issues > with Ardour, but actually I experienced an issue :D. Okay. What kind of issues are those supposed to be though, and what exactly is

Re: [arch-general] Whatever happened to speps?

On 2016-12-21 09:58:09 (-0600), Doug Newgard wrote: > > CC'ing speps. If he doesn't give signs of life and nobody else adopts the > > packages in two weeks, I'll drop them to AUR. > > > > He's been almost totally MIA, no commits since March 25th until Dec 10th. Well, I hope they will be kept in

Re: [arch-general] Ardour 5 - Was: What's with Ray Rashif?

Hey all, On 2016-12-21 17:41:24 (+0100), Ralf Mardorf wrote: > at the moment I'm testing a new audio interface. Ardour5 (not > from the testing repo) crashed on my machine, so I'm using Qtractor for > the test. Perhaps Ardour 5.5 not only crashes on my machine. So far I'm not experiencing these

Re: [arch-general] What's with Ray Rashif?

Hey Ray, is it possible to push ardour 5.5 to extra and/or testing? We're getting really far behind by now :-/ Best, David -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] Whatever happened to speps?

Hey again, > On 2016-10-23 10:42:27 (+), Antonio Rojas wrote: > > Pushed both to community-testing. Please test them as I personally > > have no interest in them and no idea what they are supposed to do. Thanks again for doing this, however it is quite unclear, if they will be properly

Re: [arch-general] Whatever happened to speps?

On 2016-10-23 10:42:27 (+), Antonio Rojas wrote: > El Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:23:26 +0200, David Runge escribió: > > > Who can push updates for pd and supercollider instead then? > > > > Best, > > David > > Pushed both to community-testing. Please test them

Re: [arch-general] Whatever happened to speps?

On 2016-10-22 12:54:09 (+0200), Muflone wrote: > > Ping! > > I tried to contact speps many times in the past year but I was unable to get > in touch with him. So some packages bad maintained were orphaned. That sounds bad. Would be good to get some statement at least... Who can push updates for

Re: [arch-general] Whatever happened to speps?

Ping! On 2016-10-10 07:17:39 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > Helloes, > > I was wondering, if anyone knows anything regarding the current status > of speps. > I tried to ping him about some long-outdated packages (supercollider, > pd), but haven't gotten a reply in a week. >

Re: [arch-general] systemd problems

Hello Peter, On 2016-10-13 13:33:27 (+0200), Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > Okt 13 05:05:47 tuchola systemd[1]: Starting Bluetooth service... > Okt 13 05:05:48 tuchola bluetoothd[485]: Bluetooth daemon 5.41 > Okt 13 05:05:48 tuchola systemd[1]: Started Bluetooth service. > Okt 13 05:05:48 tuchola

Re: [arch-general] systemd problems

Hey again, On 2016-10-13 12:01:42 (+0200), Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > > I've got problems with bluetooth (service does not start), which seem to > > > be > > > caused by systemd problems, as several services are "dead". > > you might want to check the log output of those services then. What does

Re: [arch-general] systemd problems

Hi Peter, On 2016-10-13 08:37:13 (+0200), Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > Hello, > > I've got problems with bluetooth (service does not start), which seem to be > caused by systemd problems, as several services are "dead". you might want to check the log output of those services then. > > Output

[arch-general] Whatever happened to speps?

Helloes, I was wondering, if anyone knows anything regarding the current status of speps. I tried to ping him about some long-outdated packages (supercollider, pd), but haven't gotten a reply in a week. With supercollider we're currently already at 3.7.2 and with pd at 0.47. The latter will also

Re: [arch-general] What's with Ray Rashif?

On 2016-09-28 00:32:38 (+0600), Ray Rashif via arch-general wrote: > I have just gotten access to my Arch system and will be rolling out > some updates throughout the week. Thanks to arojas and others for > taking care of rebuilds and such, and sending me nice e-mail nudges > and patches. ping!