Re: [arch-general] drop dependencies on legacy inetutils for `hostname`

2020-08-27 Thread Geert Hendrickx via arch-general
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 15:27:19 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 8/27/20 3:17 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 14:34:41 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > >> Why is it bad if you have it installed but not running? > >

Re: [arch-general] drop dependencies on legacy inetutils for `hostname`

2020-08-27 Thread Geert Hendrickx via arch-general
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 14:34:41 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > Why is it bad if you have it installed but not running? FS#41834 as an example. Or FS#28819. There is just no good reason to keep dragging purely historic crap like inetutils on so many Arch systems just because a fe

Re: [arch-general] drop dependencies on legacy inetutils for `hostname`

2020-08-27 Thread Geert Hendrickx via arch-general
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 16:50:03 +0200, Geert Hendrickx via arch-general wrote: > Hi > > A number of packages depend on inetutils merely for the `hostname` command. > Common packages include xorg-xinit and mariadb, which makes that inetutils > is still installed on a large number

[arch-general] drop dependencies on legacy inetutils for `hostname`

2020-08-23 Thread Geert Hendrickx via arch-general
Hi A number of packages depend on inetutils merely for the `hostname` command. Common packages include xorg-xinit and mariadb, which makes that inetutils is still installed on a large number of Arch systems, although its other components like rcp, rsh, talk, telnet ... and their server counterpart

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WARNING: changes to screen in testing

2012-10-22 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 14:13:22 -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > Surely there's a way to tell screen to look in a different place > for sockets. Figure out the command to do so and advertise it in > a post_upgrade message as a crutch until the user can restart > their screen sessions. Or symlink ol

Re: [arch-general] neo - german keyboard layout

2012-10-22 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 16:32:04 +0200, G. Schlisio wrote: > thanks for answering. > i added keymap to mkinitcpio, but where can i adjust the used > layout? before the hdd is decrypted (like, say, while entering the > password) it cannot access the /etc/vconsole.conf so there needs to > be an other

Re: [arch-general] neo - german keyboard layout

2012-10-21 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 22:16:22 +0200, G. Schlisio wrote: > hi list, > i played around with neo2, an alternative kbd layout optimized for > german. in my kde environment. > the main concept of neo is using meta keys to shift between layers. > for me, the meta4 key is not working on either side. i

Re: [arch-general] linux-3.5.x status

2012-08-27 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 18:06:05 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Can you run add 'break=premount' to the kernel command line and try to > get some mdadm output? I don't know exactly what to look for, but maybe > try to assemble the array with verbose output. By using break=premount, > you hook into

Re: [arch-general] linux-3.5.x status

2012-08-27 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 18:34:18 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 23.08.2012 18:29, schrieb Geert Hendrickx: > > Since upgrading to 3.5.x, my system with mdraid mirror boots with either > > a degraded RAID array, or not auto-discovering the RAID at all. > > > > The d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] merging systemd back to a singular package

2012-08-27 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 17:15:39 -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > Hi, > > I apologize for this being somewhat after-the-fact. It was discussed on > IRC, but that of course doesn't necessarily cater to a wide enough > audience. Some of you have probably already noticed that systemd 189 now > provides,

Re: [arch-general] linux-3.5.x status

2012-08-23 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 16:10:26 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > > 3.5.x is not yet ready to move to [core], > - ext4 regression is not fixed yet, will be fixed in 3.5.3 > - watchdogs are completely broken > I'm not sure how much of a showstopper the watchdogs are, so please > sho

[arch-general] openldap unit file ignores /etc/conf.d/slapd?

2012-08-21 Thread Geert Hendrickx
I've recently been testing systemd. One issue I encountered is with slapd, the unit file ignores /etc/conf.d/slapd. Is this a bug, or am I supposed to configure cmd line arguments (specially SLAPD_SERVICES) another way with systemd? Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :

Re: [arch-general] migrating crypttab to new way / luks swap problem

2012-08-01 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:09:37 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 08/01/2012 02:00 AM, Aurko Roy wrote: > >If you do man crypttab, there's an example for swap at the bottom. It is > > > > swap /dev/sda7 /dev/urandom swap > > > > >Thanks, I am aware of that, but I have luks on my swap parti

Re: [arch-general] [RFC, after the fact] initscripts config

2012-07-27 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:46:52 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > 4.2) To be clear, is there going to be a separate configuration for > > the HARDWARECLOCK and TIMEZONE variables? > > There already are. That's the problem. HARDWARECLOCK is configured in > the third line of /etc/adjtime (see hwclock

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 17:21:24 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:18:28 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote: > >You used --force (-f) again. http://i.imgur.com/5Zd1w.png > > > I did NOT. Was /lib your current working dir when you ran pacman? Or did any other process have it open so i

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] heads up: /lib removal

2012-07-07 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 13:25:29 -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > Hey all, > > Allan pushed glib 2.16-2 into [testing] which removes /lib as a > directory, replacing it with a symlink. A bit of advice... > > - In the simplest case, the upgrade can be done as simply as: > > pacman -Syu --ignore g

Re: [arch-general] [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] final leg of /lib removal

2012-07-03 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 14:18:07 -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > Worst case scenario, users of custom kernels can: > > - manually move /lib/modules/mycustomkernel to /usr/lib/modules/ until > they can do a proper rebuild. > - boot a stock -ARCH kernel (you DO have it listed as a fallback, > right

Re: [arch-general] [Offtopic] back up /var/log before shutdown

2012-06-20 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 16:14:46 -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 14:38:27 +0530, gt wrote: > > For the mutt users, just press "#" to decouple the message from the parent > > thread. :-) > > Not in my .muttrc. What option is this? I might have unbound the key for > some re

Re: [arch-general] [Offtopic] back up /var/log before shutdown

2012-06-20 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 14:38:27 +0530, gt wrote: > Hello Arno > > Sorry for the offtopic bit, but i have noticed that your threads tend to > branch out from some other thread, many times. > > I believe that you use the reply button on an existing topic and then > start your own thread. This look

[arch-general] netcfg status?

2012-05-09 Thread Geert Hendrickx
Hi, What is the status of netcfg 2.8.x? When will it hit [core] ? I have been using it succesfully on my workstation and on two VPS (static IPv4 + IPv6 profiles). Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam m

Re: [arch-general] renice Bash at login

2012-04-23 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 14:25:09 +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote: > Well I want to decrease the priority of all users logged into the > system (expect root) at login. So let's say run every bash and every > spawned process that a user run with priority 5. If your users are just running vi and

Re: [arch-general] glibc update broke time display

2011-12-18 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 20:02:38 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Have reproduced and fixed. Will be uploading a new package in the next > hour or so. Fix confirmed, glibc-2.14.1-4 works for me. Thanks, Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F This e-mail was

[arch-general] glibc update broke time display

2011-12-18 Thread Geert Hendrickx
glibc-2.14.1-3 broke time display for me. It displays UTC regardless of /etc/localtime or TZ environment variable. Downgrading fixed it again. # date Sun Dec 18 09:35:36 UTC 2011 # ls -l /etc/localtime lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Dec 1 20:02 /etc/localtime -> /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Brussels

Re: [arch-general] pacman/libalpm/libfetch do not honor TMPDIR

2011-11-25 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:55:55 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote: > Actually, what is stupid is keeping /tmp in RAM. It is an important dir, > where you might have an valuable info in case of a system crash. I could > never understand the logic behind this choice. Reducing disk i/o. Geert

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] cryptsetup 1.4.0-2

2011-11-07 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:41:47 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 03.11.2011 19:51, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > > In -2, I fixed a bug in "cryptsetup status" for plain volumes where the > > key size would always be displayed as 0. > > Can anyone confirm that the i686 package works? Works for me:

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] cryptsetup 1.4.0-1

2011-10-31 Thread Geert Hendrickx
Apparantly this affects only plain volumes (not luks), and will be fixed in 1.4.1: http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/issues/detail?id=115 You may want to include the patch already? http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/source/detail?r=665# Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendric

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] cryptsetup 1.4.0-1

2011-10-31 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 13:11:31 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 31.10.2011 12:54, schrieb Geert Hendrickx: > > Appears to work fine, however I noticed a change in cryptsetup status > > output: > > > > /dev/mapper/cryptswap is active. > >type:PLAIN >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] cryptsetup 1.4.0-1

2011-10-31 Thread Geert Hendrickx
Appears to work fine, however I noticed a change in cryptsetup status output: /dev/mapper/cryptswap is active. type:PLAIN cipher: aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 - keysize: 256 bits + keysize: 0 bits device: /dev/xvda1 offset: 0 sectors size:2097152 sectors (both on the existing

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [prerelease] initscripts-2011.09.2-1

2011-10-05 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 16:00:52 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > * /etc/localtime may now be a symlink, and is not written to unless it is > necessary. Hi, why not always make it a symlink, so updates to tzdata package are applied immediatly and don't require a reboot? Is it for scenario's where

Re: [arch-general] Daylight Saving Time canceled in Ukraine, will Arch know?

2011-09-22 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 19:29:17 +0300, Barton wrote: > How would Arch Linux handle it for the users who do not have NTP > configured? Btw, this has nothing to do with NTP (or other time synchrnonisation mechanisms). The system's internal clock uses epoch time, which is timezone independent. T

Re: [arch-general] Daylight Saving Time canceled in Ukraine, will Arch know?

2011-09-22 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 23:27:50 -0400, Jonathan wrote: > You can check the current DST dates with "zgrep -v /etc/localtime | grep > 2011" Once you get the updated package you can copy the new zoneinfo file > from /usr/share/zoneinfo to /etc/localtime. You want "zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 20

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] db 5.2.36-1

2011-09-21 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:20:59 -0400, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > Upstream update. Only python{,2}-bsddb should need a rebuild as it contain > hardcoded version strings. Openldap should be rebuilt as well, as slapd fails to start: bdb_back_initialize: BDB library version mismatch: expected B

Re: [arch-general] Creating an Arch chroot on a non-Arch system?

2011-07-23 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:07:28 +0200, Dan Vrátil wrote: > Theoretically, you just need to compile pacman and then you can continue > as if you were making an Arch chroot from an Arch system. I can't think > of anything easier :) Yes, that's how I've done it on CentOS. Converted a VPS from Cen

Re: [arch-general] upgrading postfix - newaliases: error while loading libdb-5.1.so -- ignore?

2011-07-06 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 22:12:54 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote: > it was fixed couples of hours ago in postfix-2.8.3-4.1 Confirmed, thanks! Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!

Re: [arch-general] upgrading postfix - newaliases: error while loading libdb-5.1.so -- ignore?

2011-07-06 Thread Geert Hendrickx
Same here. On x86_64, postfix-2.8.3-4 is linked to the new db version, whereas on i686, it is (accidentally?) still linked to the old. I've recompiled my own as a workaround on i686. Geert

Re: [arch-general] Anything to manage user daemons?

2011-06-22 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09:34 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > yuck. > if you just want to manage daemons running as your own user, su and > sudo shouldn't even be involved. A user crontab with @reboot entries? Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F