on the subject through in the aftermath.
Geoff
I don't make much use of audacity, and have not tested extensively. Starting
from an xterm on my i686, fully patched, system, I see the error, but the
program runs and appears to function normally. I see a lot of other errors in
the xterm - but they don't appear to be wxgtk related, and they may
er cower
in the AUR)
Geoff
I have found them genuinely helpful in gaining
perspective on the systemd issue. But please, I beg you, don't take us into
quantum mechanics, the Standard Model and all its ramifications. My nerves won't
stand contemplating how systemd interacts with the Everett Interpretation :)
Geoff
ce for future choices? Engineers are not
necessarily any better qualified than the rest of us to get those calls right.
Geoff
were 20 years
ago. Further, the success of linux in fields far removed from my
irrelevant little desktop brings opportunities and problems which may interest
those people more. Times change, but one is allowed to regret some of the
consequences.
Geoff
ther posters (especially the
internal debate between Red Hat devs). I understand that there are advantages,
but I am left with the lingering impression that systemd is part of a larger
project, - as discussed by Fons Adriaensen in this thread. It bothers me.
Geoff
.
Geoff
riticism of the devs - it is
their distro and they are entitled to do what they choose with it. But it does
make me sad.
Geoff
the direction they are taking might lead the
person concerned reluctantly to use something else instead. How they respond
to such opinions is, of course, entirely a matter for them.
Geoff
ents. I do,
however, find this contribution the thread to which you refer very saddening.
It is not the way I interpret the vast majority of contributions here.
"Let's do it. It's about time we lose these ML trolls.
--
Gaetan"
Perhaps we should all just shut up and do as we are told.
Geoff
it after first using an assembler program written in BASIC, typed in
from a book.
Geoff
it package which Arch uses in preference to cdrtools. You would just
end up with no burning software at all.
You would need to uninstall cdrkit and replace it with cdrtools from AUR.
Geoff
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:45:41 +0100
Karol Babioch wrote:
> So I've installed the nvidia package according to the wiki. But now I've
> got the problem that as soon as I start the X server, I've got a blank
> screen whenever switching back to the consoles (tty1-tty6). This
> consoles stay blank ev
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:36:19 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 11.04.2011 11:32, schrieb Geoff:
> > I hope this does not count as noise on this list, but can anybody confirm /
> > deny that the lilo issue which I read about here has been resolved in the
> > kernel vers
I hope this does not count as noise on this list, but can anybody confirm /
deny that the lilo issue which I read about here has been resolved in the
kernel version now available for download?
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=93100
Geoff
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:53:21 +0100
Arvid Picciani wrote:
>
> can you help me find another term i should use
> to denote the desktop idea, that is not offensive?
>
"integrationist" ?
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Seems to work now :)
Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave
me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of
displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had
been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I shou
Sorry to post a test message, but I am an infrequent poster
whose e-mails have not been getting through. I wrote to
the list admins about it a while ago but got no response, so
I have unsubscribed / resubscribed.
#x27;t write to arch-general. Thanks.
But why? A public dev list is a valuable opportunity for us
all to see how the devs are thinking, but I would never
dream of posting to it. The devs would probably disregard
anything I had to say as noise, - and quite right too. Why
should not people like me be able to discuss system issues
here?
Geoff
from LFS to Slackware and
eventually arrived here. "LFS+pacman" is a good
rough summary of what I was looking for. It takes all
sorts of people to make a world - and to make a distro
user-base. ;-)
Geoff
oment, but surely every
user/developer of open source projects understands how to
make allowance for that.
Geoff
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:52:45 +0200
Pierre CHAPUIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm willing to start a French fork then. :)
I think you should call it "Poisson Linux".
:-)
hat dissenters are howling at the moon. I do not
understand this to be the case here. So far as I can tell,
a debate is taking place to which users can contribute (no
doubt minimally), by expressing their views. Isn't that
what a general mailing list on an open source project is
for? Isn't that better than walking (forking) away?
Geoff
the devs
don't have to read a line of it if they don't want. I have
not seen any "childish" comments here, on either side of a
civilised debate.
Geoff
I am sure that nobody wants to demonise *any* of the
hard-working devs. On the other hand, there is no point in
people hiding the strength of their opinions on such an
important point of principle. We should hate the sin, not
the sinner.
Geoff
itched to Arch last September, from Slackware,
precisely because of what I had learned about Arch "as it
was". I am not a fanatical purist, or even a computer
science person. I am just a reasonably well-informed
ordinary user who hates to be babied. I can only say that I
*very* much hope that and your allies you win the battle
Aaron.
Geoff
ng (except scroll lock - I don't know if that ever
worked).
Geoff
29 matches
Mail list logo
