Re: [arch-general] How to have multiple JDKs parallel?

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:48 PM Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > > On 9/17/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > > So essentially what you really want is a way for pacman to remember your > > choice. That would require pacman modify its configuration which is > > something that go

Re: [arch-general] Orca, java-atk-wrapper, and OpenJDK8

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Hunter Jozwiak via arch-general > wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I am trying to get java-atk-wrapper and OpenJDK8 working together with >> the Orca screenreader. I have noticed

Re: [arch-general] Orca, java-atk-wrapper, and OpenJDK8

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Hunter Jozwiak via arch-general wrote: > Greetings, > > I am trying to get java-atk-wrapper and OpenJDK8 working together with > the Orca screenreader. I have noticed that the following files exist in > OpenJDK7 but not for my default JRE: > usr/lib/jvm/ > usr/lib/

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since >> 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can resul

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker wrote: > > Hello, > > The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since > 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can result in > runtime warnings for some JavaFX applications whose FXML was created > specifying a newer API vers

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Levente Polyak wrote: > > On 10/31/2016 04:03 PM, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: > > As a middle ground, I think it would be more reasonable (or at least, > > less unreasonable) to modify makepkg to allow signing PKGBUILDs, or at > > least parts of them. For an e

Re: [arch-general] What's with Ray Rashif?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:59 PM, wrote: > Hey guys! > > I'm not writing this mail to complain, I'm just wondering! I use ardour > quite a lot and of course I wanted the update to version 5 as soon as > possible. The first release 5.0 didn't build here, so I thought ok, maybe > the maintainer of t

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Bennett Piater wrote: > Oh, that looks promising. I'll read through those issues tomorrow. > Thank you! :) > > Cheers, > Bennett > > On 09/11/2016 09:08 PM, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >> Oh, this stuff might all be related to the issue: [0], [1], [2] >> >

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:51:03 +0200, Bennett Piater wrote: > >> No freeze since the one I told you about! I will definitely > >> investigate further if/when I get a new one. > > > >Very weird... > >I had another one yesterday, but again, no c

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Bennett Piater wrote: >> Comparing your pacman.log with mine (mine taken from 2016-08-23 to >> 2016-09-05), here is the list of common packages we both have either >> installed or upgraded: >> >> - man-db >> - mariadb >> - mariadb-clients >> - mediainfo >> - nano >

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:32:40 +0200, Bennett Piater wrote: >>> Regarding >>> >>> https://www.google.de/?gws_rd=ssl#q=+linux+no+.xsession-errors >>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=143068 >>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slac

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Bennett Piater wrote: > Hi all, > I've had a very elusive and frustrating problem this week and don't know > where to look anymore. > Maybe one of you has an idea? :) > > Since 2016-09-04, i3wm freezes every once and a while; often after > waking the screen (even if

Re: [arch-general] Network issue with broadcom-wl-dkms

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Thomas AUREL wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I have some issues with my wireless. It is capable to connect to a network > (with a static IP address) but when i launch a application which network, my > laptop froze. > > The last driver version is installed with dkms (

Re: [arch-general] [Q] Package all sources in openjdk8-src as Fedora does

x/security \ > -javax/sound \ > -javax/sql \ > -javax/swing \ > -javax/tools \ > -javax/xml \ > -org/ietf \ > -org/omg \ > -org/w3c/dom \ > -org/xml/sax \ > +javax \ > +jdk \ > +org \ > +sun \ > # > > SR

Re: [arch-general] [Q] Package all sources in openjdk8-src as Fedora does

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Konstantin Gribov wrote: > > As I saw in fedora openjdk rpm, they bundle non-public java sources (like > packages in sun, jdk etc). It's quite useful for debugging when low-level > jdk parts involved, so I propose this patch (based on java8-openjdk > 8.u51-1). > >

Re: [arch-general] out of date accessibility package, liblouis

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:59 PM, kendell clark wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:42 AM, kendell clark > > wrote: hi all I'm writing in to let > > everyone know that a

Re: [arch-general] out of date accessibility package, liblouis

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:42 AM, kendell clark wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > hi all > I'm writing in to let everyone know that according to > packages.archlinux.org, liblouis has been flagged out of date since > september of last year. The url and download location

Re: [arch-general] traceroute package

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:37 PM, wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We've found a inconsistency with the traceroute installation and it's >> manpage. >> The manpage says 'traceroute6 is an equivalent to traceroute -6', but in >> arch linux this does not

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

On 5 October 2014 02:09, Maxwell Anselm wrote: > > > What is the name/URL of this app? > It's the GURPS character sheet: http://gurpscharactersheet.com/ > I have a github repo for my WIP AUR package: > https://github.com/silverhammermba/gcs > > > If building on a box where multiple JVM can be inst

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

On 2 October 2014 18:41, Maxwell Anselm wrote: > I'm working on a PKGBUILD for a Java app that must be built and run using > Java 8, but I couldn't find any guidelines on best practices for such a > situation. > > The easy part is including 'java-environment=8' and 'java-runtime=8' in > makedepend

Re: [arch-general] java: cannot execute - too many levels of symbolic links

On 9 September 2014 12:25, lolilolicon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Guillaume ALAUX > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Guillaume here (packager of that "piece of crap" java-common). > > Yes it is pretty crappy. > >>> symlinks

Re: [arch-general] java: cannot execute - too many levels of symbolic links

On 9 September 2014 10:50, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > Guillaume ALAUX writes: > > Hello, > >> Guillaume here (packager of that "piece of crap" java-common). > > I did not say that ... > >> This issue and its fix were already reported here [0] and discusse

Re: [arch-general] java: cannot execute - too many levels of symbolic links

On 9 September 2014 09:15, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >> >> Hi List, >> >> after updating yesterday java does not work anymore for me: >> >> , >> | [tj@arch ~]$ LC_ALL=C java --help >> | /usr/bin/java: line 2: /usr/lib/jvm/default/bin/java:

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 5 June 2014 02:02, Boyan Ding wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 23:20 +0200, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > > On 2 June 2014 03:21, Boyan Ding wrote: > > > Hi Guillaume, > > > I really appreciate your work, but are the versioning of the openjdk8* > > > packag

Re: [arch-general] NotMuch man pages

On 16 June 2014 14:48, wrote: > Hello every one, > > I use notmuch to handle my mails, but I recently discovered that the man > pages aren't present in the notmuch package and there isn't any > notmuch-man package. Is that a decision or should I report a bug ? > Eventually should I make a notmuch

Re: [arch-general] Question on version numbers

On 15 June 2014 14:30, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > Hi, > just because I'm inquisitive. What's the purpose of version numbers with > a colon? I've seen this in several packages, e.g. this one [1]. Upstream > version number is 5.0.2 and arch version number is 1:5.0.2. > > Regards, > Stefan > > [1]: ht

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 2 June 2014 03:21, Boyan Ding wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > I really appreciate your work, but are the versioning of the openjdk8* > packages correct? They should be 8.u0_b132 or simply 8.u0 instead of > 8.u132... > > By the way I also made a PKGBUILD [1] based on yours and it's currently > on 8u5.

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 29 March 2014 01:02, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > > On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > > > I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 > > packages into arch? > > > > -- > > Caleb Cushing > > >

Re: [arch-general] Broken mirror

On 16 May 2014 13:54, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: >> $ ping6 archlinux.c3sl.ufpr.br > > Google reveals ufpr.br is the "UFPR - Universidade Federal do Paraná". > Their website isn't reachable, so your contact - from your friendly > WHOIS servi

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 30 March 2014 19:47, Javier Vasquez wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Guillaume ALAUX > wrote: >> On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing wrote: >>> >>> I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 >>> packages into arch?

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 29 March 2014 01:02, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing wrote: >> >> I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 >> packages into arch? >> >> -- >> Caleb Cushing >> >> http://xenoterracid

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 > packages into arch? > > -- > Caleb Cushing > > http://xenoterracide.com > > Calendar: > https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=xenoterracide%40gmail.com&ctz=America/Chicago Hello

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?

On 13 June 2012 22:02, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Sakalis wrote: >> Hello, >> not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds, >> but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled >> libraries on 64bit. From the excepti

Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

On 10 June 2012 20:40, Kwpolska wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot > wrote: > > On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik > > wrote: > >> On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers > >>> use the mai

Re: [arch-general] view command

On 8 May 2012 18:27, Tiago Sousa wrote: > Hey. > I don't have that behavior here but i guess if you set the environment > EDITOR variable to vim it should work. > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:31 PM, G. Schlisio wrote: > >> hi all, >> i stumbled over view being a link to ex, and not to vim, as i am

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

On 5 March 2012 21:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lukas Fleischer > > wrote: > > > * bluez-firmware > > > > I take this one. > > Thanks! > > > > > > * lzo > > > > If nothing is depending on this, it

Re: [arch-general] How to find if a file belongs to a installed package?

On 20 November 2011 12:02, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: > > Why I'm so blind, > Thanks > > On 20 November 2011 12:48, Jakob Gruber wrote: > > On 11/20/2011 11:44 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I have been looking but I haven't found a solution to check if a given > >> file in my s

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3 Always in Fallback Mode

de Hardware > Acceleration? Or just the Gnome don't support it? Or I have chosen the wrong > driver? > > How can I check whether the driver supports 3d hardware acceleration (of > course out of Gnome)? > > > Mail by Max Xie > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23,

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3 Always in Fallback Mode

On 23 August 2011 09:48, Max Xie wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for my bad English. > > I've just bought a new computer about 1 month ago and I tried to install > archlinux as second OS on it yesterday. But when I got everything done and > started the Gnome, it took a minute and, started in Fallback Mode

Re: [arch-general] pacdiff / pacdiffviewer doesn't notice change in kdmrc

On 13 April 2011 18:10, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On 13 April 2011 18:03, Marek Otahal wrote: >> >> hi, >> by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a change in >> kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember being notified about the >> m

Re: [arch-general] pacdiff / pacdiffviewer doesn't notice change in kdmrc

On 13 April 2011 18:03, Marek Otahal wrote: > > hi, > by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a change in > kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember being notified about the > modification on almost every kde update. > > By creating a /etc/rc.conf.pacnew I verify they wor

Re: [arch-general] How to stop everything.log spamming ?

On 5 March 2011 06:15, fredbezies wrote: > > Hello. > > I'm facing bug 22690 and /var/log/everything.log get spammed every 5 > seconds. > > Any tricks to stop this spam ? Or do I have to wait to see it get fixed ? > > Thanks for your info and tips. > > Have a good day. > > -- > Frederic Bezies > f

Re: [arch-general] GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)

On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 09:03 +0100, Frank Thieme wrote: > Hi! > > Maybe it's just me, but all your messages in this thread have a bad > signature... > > Bye...Frank Hello, I imported both Karol's signature and yours and Evo says the signature is valid. It just complains as I haven't signed nor

Re: [arch-general] Package building - Change name of finished package

On 3 January 2011 17:08, Baho Utot wrote: > On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:38:52 am Guillaume ALAUX wrote: >> On 3 January 2011 16:52, Baho Utot wrote: >> > On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:17:46 am Ray Rashif wrote: >> >> On 3 January 2011 23:29, Baho Utot wrot

Re: [arch-general] Package building - Change name of finished package

On 3 January 2011 16:52, Baho Utot wrote: > On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:17:46 am Ray Rashif wrote: >> On 3 January 2011 23:29, Baho Utot wrote: >> > joomla-1.5.22-1-any-.pkg.tar.xz >> > >> > Is this possible? >> >> No. >> >> joomla-$sitename-1.55.22-1-any.pkg.tar.xz is possible: >> >> _sitenam

Re: [arch-general] Wireshark 1.4.2 stops capturing packets

On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:07 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 21/11/10 14:08, mwnn wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After capturing a random number of packets, the new wireshark-1.4.2 > > stops capturing packets. > > > > Bug reports work best going to the bug tracker and supplying more details. > > Allan

Re: [arch-general] package xboard long outdated, new pkgbuild attached

On 5 November 2010 03:21, Auguste Pop wrote: > Hi, > > The xboard package in extra has been long outdated and orphaned. I > have attached my own PKGBUILD which includes an .desktop file to ease > the use. > > Can any maintainer just update it? > > Thank you for your kind attention. > > Best Regar

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 18:47, Christian wrote: > Hi, > > > On 2010-10-04 at 18:42 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >>On 4 October 2010 18:37, Christian wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 2010-10-04 at 18:29 Jan de Groot wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 18:37, Christian wrote: > Hi, > > > On 2010-10-04 at 18:29 Jan de Groot wrote: > >>On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:15 +0200, Christian wrote: >>> I wait for about 30 seconds before I login as my user but nothing >>> happens when I press enter after I have entered my password. >> >>gdm h

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 18:35, Christian wrote: > Hello, > > > On 2010-10-04 at 17:34 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >>On 4 October 2010 17:15, Christian wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> I had to do a reinstall of my machine so I did that and for some reason, >>Gnome does

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 17:15, Christian wrote: > Hi all, > I had to do a reinstall of my machine so I did that and for some reason, > Gnome doesn't start proprely. I am visually impaired so I can't see the > screen until I have logged into Gnome and started Orca, the screen reader for > Gnome. > Her

Re: [arch-general] Problem with keyboard in Gnome

On 3 October 2010 17:57, Christian wrote: > Hi again, > > > On 2010-10-02 at 00:56 Ulf Winkelvos wrote: > >>On 02.10.2010 00:42, Christian wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 2010-10-02 at 00:24 Jan Steffens wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Christian >>wrote: > Hi all, > I have g

Re: [arch-general] Need help with compilation

On 2 October 2010 23:54, Kazuo Teramoto wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Christian wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am trying to compile a package from source called BRLTTY. The current >> version that is in the repository is v4.1 so I looked in the PKGBUILD script >> and I installed the dependen

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] abs-2.4.0-1

On 3 October 2010 05:12, Allan McRae wrote: > On 02/10/10 21:19, Mike Sampson wrote: >> >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Allan McRae  wrote: >>> >>> On 02/10/10 19:29, Mike Sampson wrote: >> [snip] Slightly off topic. I always wondered why there wasn't a Python proto PKGBUILD

Re: [arch-general] Intel GMA 3150 Graphics Card driver

2010/9/23 Cédric Girard : > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Adamzyg wrote: > >> thank you. >> if I max the glxgears window, it only ouput like below: >> >> *118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 23.560 FPS* >> *137 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.220 FPS* >> *139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.691 FPS* >> *139 fra

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta_174_g41bc-1

On 9 September 2010 13:02, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 09.09.2010 11:55, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> this will hopefully the last update of xz for some time. :-) Maybe this >> is a sign for the final 5.0 version to be near. I am now using the (very >> strange) upstream versioning scheme. > > That's jus

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] dbus-core 1.2.24-2

On 6 September 2010 19:35, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 06.09.2010 14:09, schrieb Jan de Groot: >> Please signoff for both architectures. This release should fix the >> threading issues that crashes KDE a lot. >> >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20604 > > Looking good so far, although I didn't have

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta-7

On 6 September 2010 19:57, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > So, here is another xz release. The upstream change from pkgrel=6 that > actually changes relevant code among some translation fixes is "xz: Use > an array instead of pointer for stdin_filename." > > Please sign off, > > Pierre > > -- > Pierre Sch

Re: [arch-general] wireshark 1.4.0-2 crashes

On 6 September 2010 17:25, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 09/06/2010 06:15 PM, mwnn wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I am running the x86 version of Arch. The recently updated wireshark >> segfaults on my machine. >> >> Here is the backtrace of the core file generated by gdb. >> >> (gdb) bt >> #0 0xb4e3731f in PyObjec

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.4.p3-1

On 5 September 2010 15:25, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 05.09.2010 15:30, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 22/08/10 17:46, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >>> On 08/22/2010 07:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote: Upstream bug fix release. Signoff both, Allan >>> >>> signoff x86_64 >>> >> >> Any chance of an

Re: [arch-general] "community/jre" and "community/jdk" packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

On 29 July 2010 16:42, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 07/29/2010 12:34 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >> On 25 July 2010 19:02, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: >> >> On 25 July 2010 18:45, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >>> >>> On 07/25/2010 07:37 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: &g

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

Mandriva Cooker is like debian sid that's the unstable branch from which they freeze to stable ones. On 29 July 2010 16:36, Caleb Cushing wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Caleb Cushing > wrote: > > how embarrassing. > > I guess cooker is like their testing version... but according to

Re: [arch-general] "community/jre" and "community/jdk" packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

On 25 July 2010 19:02, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On 25 July 2010 18:45, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > >> On 07/25/2010 07:37 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: >> >>> On 25 July 2010 18:17, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >>> >>> On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: >&g

Re: [arch-general] "community/jre" and "community/jdk" packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

On 25 July 2010 18:45, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 07/25/2010 07:37 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >> On 25 July 2010 18:17, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> >> On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Sunday 25 Ju

Re: [arch-general] "community/jre" and "community/jdk" packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

On 25 July 2010 18:17, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sunday 25 Jul 2010 at 16:50 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: >> >>> I also have some suggestions for these packages: >>> - rename them from {jre,j

[arch-general] "community/jre" and "community/jdk" packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

Hi everyone, "community/jre" and "community/jdk" packages are out of date. I have merged the two PKGBUILDs in one split PKGBUILD (enclosed to this email with the srcpkg) and updated the links and md5sums. It works fine on my i686 Arch. Will test it on x64 tonight when at home. Would someone wan

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

On 17 June 2010 22:24, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Thursday 17 June 2010 22:07:31 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > > Sweet ! > > > > Well done Andreas. Could we see the sources plz? I'm curious ! > Of curse. > http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/libfwbuilder/trunk/ &

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

Sweet ! Well done Andreas. Could we see the sources plz? I'm curious ! On 17 June 2010 22:04, Gaurish Sharma wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Andrea Scarpino > wrote: > > Hi, > > please try these packages and report any issue. > > If you say that them are working I will upload them in

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

Which architecture your are building on? On 17 June 2010 21:50, Gaurish Sharma wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > > > > first compile and install libfwbuilder and then compile fwbuilder against > > the new libfwbuilder. the order is important > > > > -- > > Ionuț > >

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

On 16 June 2010 22:49, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 06/16/2010 11:47 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote: > >> Hi, >> The fwbuilder package which is very usefull for writing firewall rules is >> flagged out of date since weeks. there is a major 4 which has lots of >> new features[1] >> >> Any reason its not being

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Out-of-date packages in [extra]/[community]

2010/6/17 Angel Velásquez > >> - biopython > >> - pylint > >> - python-cheetah > >> - python-formencode > >> - python-sqlobject (needed by pacbuild, but does pacbuild still work?!) > >> - python-gdata (needed by pytube in [community]) > >> - python-vpython > > Let me have the python ones (mainly

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 17 June 2010 01:34, Allan McRae wrote: > On 17/06/10 00:48, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >> Are the python scripts in the pacbuild package (apple, strawberry, >> queuepackage, waka and uploadpackage) used any more as described in this >> page<http://wiki.archl

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 16 June 2010 02:23, Allan McRae wrote: > Just to clarify the build process that goes on here: > > 1) make a clean chroot (mkarchroot - only needs done once) > 2) build package in chroot (makechrootpkg) > 3) upload package to staging area and commit to svn (e.g. testingpkg) > 4) release package

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 15 June 2010 16:55, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou >> wrote: >> >>> Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of >>> developers, >>> I think it is preferable to sub

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 15 June 2010 16:46, Dan McGee wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Guillaume ALAUX > wrote: > >>How exactly is core and extra database populated? > >> Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of > > developers > > Packages are n

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

>How exactly is core and extra database populated? > Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of developers Packages are not build on developers computers but on build machines as explained here http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacbuild

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Namcap release coming soon

Ow OK I get it ! Thx for these highlights Dan. -- Guillaume ALAUX On 8 June 2010 17:21, Dan McGee wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Guillaume ALAUX > wrote: > > On 8 June 2010 16:58, Dan McGee wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dan McGee wrot

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Namcap release coming soon

On 8 June 2010 16:58, Dan McGee wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dan McGee wrote: > > Forwarding to the public list is your best option; going to one > > developer is a good way for your email to get lost. > > > > -- Forwarded message -----

Re: [arch-general] Converting to 64

Hum... this technique looks like reinstalling to me. You don't *convert*anything but *reinstall* packages. So to my point of view you would be better off installing from scratch. Much cleaner. You will still have to download 64bits packages. Still you can keep the list of installed packages with $

Re: [arch-general] extra/tomcat is out of date

My pleasure ! On 26 May 2010 22:31, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 05/26/2010 01:12 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Tested on my x64 (and changed the pkgrel that was wrong): that works. >> >> So... anyone interested in this up-to-date version o

Re: [arch-general] extra/tomcat is out of date

Hi, Tested on my x64 (and changed the pkgrel that was wrong): that works. So... anyone interested in this up-to-date version of a masterpiece of the Java world? :) Guillaume On 20 May 2010 12:11, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > Hi everyone, > > A new version of Tomcat 5 was released nearl

[arch-general] extra/tomcat is out of date

hed is the up-to-date PKGBUILD. Cheers, Guillaume ALAUX PKGBUILD Description: Binary data

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

n the AUR page to explain that this pkg requires testing and feedback. I will also get the wiki page up to date to reflect this repo change if you confirm you deleted it. Thanks. Guillaume ALAUX On 10 May 2010 16:01, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > >

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did for v1.99? On 10 May 2010 15:50, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > > Hi everyone, > > &

[arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

Hi everyone, As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using it give it a try please? Thanks Guil