On 2018-09-20 18:42, David Runge wrote:
On 2018-09-14 12:21:26 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote:
They called it 'binmerge' :)
Hope this can be achieved for all profiles.
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/commit/4200932d8fb31cc3782d96dd8312511e807fd09b
I think this should fix issues with referenci
But I have a question: why was AUDIT enabled in the first place? I
thought it
was cosidered useless?
AFAIK, it was considered slow (at least for syscalls), but after recent
changes
in kernel it doesn't matter anymore.
You can read discussion here https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/42954
ist, doesn't we?
[1]
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/linux&id=c75a915313f72924fa0a3ed45356f9e0ea488f3b
On 2018-09-09 18:24, Maksim Fomin via arch-general wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 17:34, Gus wrote:
> You
You have been rejected by heftig and tpowa. It is unclear why and what
you are asking here.
It was accepted first and then rejected by heftig.
Suppose AppArmour does not require linking. So what?
As heftig wrote, that was main reason for rejecting SELinux and AppArmor
support, but since it doe
Linux-hardened doesn't support hibernation and i think it's overkill to
use it on desktop.
On 2018-09-09 14:04, Filipe Laíns via arch-general wrote:
On Sun, 2018-09-09 at 13:42 +, Gus wrote:
I know such request was rejected here
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/59733
recently,
I know such request was rejected here
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/59733
recently, but still AppArmor doesn't need linking with libraries and
doesn't
require as much userland support as SELinux, so it will not hurt to have
one
option enabled in kernel, right?
6 matches
Mail list logo
