Re: [arch-general] Mutt Compile-time Configuration

2016-08-20 Thread Hunter Connelly via arch-general
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:52:36AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > talkingarch users who haven't got g.u.i. running may have problems with that > sidebar due to graphical character output from that feature messing up their > screen readers. There could be other or additional reasons I know nothing >

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 24

2016-08-19 Thread Hunter Connelly via arch-general
I was just wondering about what people thought about having MS code in the repos. I remember Skype used to be in multilib, and that wasn't even open source. I didn't expect this much of a reaction. Sorry if this isn't the place to discuss things like that. On August 19, 2016 11:17:34 AM EDT, "

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?

2016-08-18 Thread Hunter Connelly via arch-general
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:00:33PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > Why would anyone want to use an overly-verbose scripting language like > PowerShell as an interactive shell, **unless it was their only option**? While I tend to prefer Unix-style shells, there are *some* things that

[arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?

2016-08-18 Thread Hunter Connelly via arch-general
Recently, Microsoft released the source code for PowerShell under the MIT license. Here's the link for that. https://github.com/powershell/powershell I was wondering what you guys thought about it. Specifically, if any of you will be using it, if you think it should be in the main repos, what t