Re: [arch-general] Missing Dependency virtualbox-host-dkms

2016-03-07 Thread Jack O'Connor
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst wrote: > Yes, I think that would be the best solution. Each '*-headers' package > could provide 'kernel-headers' (or something like that). > Provides does not imply conflict, so that wouldn't be a problem. > > Note that a user could still install

Re: [arch-general] Missing Dependency virtualbox-host-dkms

2016-03-07 Thread Jack O'Connor
> I didn't force the deps to linux-headers because you could use the kernel > (linux, linux-lts, linux-zen, linux-grsec, etc) you prefer (or all together). > I will add a message with the next release of virtualbox. Would it be possible to depend on a "Provides" that all the different kernel heade