On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Loui Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:36:17PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:52:45 -0600, Aaron Griffin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Pierre Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Klier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Chu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Michael Klier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Chu wrote:
Yeah, put those in your public repo too and then I'll release a new
version of srcpac.
Ok, almost finished
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Michael Klier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loui wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:20:37 -0700
Jason Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I
guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work... you'd need
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:52:21PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
RedShift schrieb:
You guys just don't get it. This is about _principle_.
YOUR principle.
Yes, and guess where I got them from. Arch, 3 years ago.
There is in fact a valid reason why we should not hardcode devpts and I am
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:47:11AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
Jason,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
Ok, after building the PKGBUILD and running namcap on it, I got these
messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a]$ namcap c3270-3.3.7p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
c3270 W: Dependency included
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:03:17PM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
Jason,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
What does readelf -d /usr/bin/c3270 tell you? Namcap doesn't actually use
ldd, it uses something faster and more accurate.
I'm guessing it's the Shared Library section
6 matches
Mail list logo
