Re: [arch-general] New Google Group for discussion and notices on Arch security.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Andres P wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote: >> >> ah yes, SSL! sorry :) >> > > On 2006-05-01 22:34:12, Ulf Möller, openssl developer [1], responded > [2] to openssl packager Kurt Roeckx [

Re: [arch-general] New Google Group for discussion and notices on Arch security.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Andres P wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:33 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >>> >>> security is the responsibility of those deploying, not those >>>

Re: [arch-general] New Google Group for discussion and notices on Arch security.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:33 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > > security is the responsibility of those deploying, not those > packaging.  it requires end-to-end oversight and complete > configuration toward a specific and particular purpose; something that > is not possible for those creating a di

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux and security - it needs some work

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Nicky726 wrote: > Hm, > > would be nice. :-) I ve been digging into SELinux and Arch lately, and yes > some more official support would be nice. If there is something being > organized, > I'd gladly help, at least in this SELinux area. > security isnt about SELin