Re: [arch-general] Drop non-free ?! (Was: Commit in ffmpeg/trunk)

2011-05-07 Thread Jonathan Beatty
On 05/07/2011 12:33 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote: and most Linux users don't give a damn if something is "nonfree." That's precisely part of the problem. You are walking blindly into patent traps and the destruction of a mutually beneficial community just for the sake of convenience. Have fun wit

Re: [arch-general] ArchLinux for mipsel (Loongson)

2011-04-30 Thread Jonathan Beatty
On 04/30/2011 04:52 PM, javier wrote: Has the site have an English version? I'd like to look into packages page, and the aur packages page as well, to see if it make sense to try it out... I moved back to debian some time back precisely cause arch was all for x86, so I didn't think it was going

Re: [arch-general] trinity-kdevelop corrupted

2011-04-26 Thread Jonathan Beatty
On 04/26/2011 10:51 AM, vilares wrote: Hi, I'm tring to install kde from: http://www.kiwilight.com/trinity/i686/ During instalation following error appears: "File trinity-kdevelop-1222477-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted. Do you want to delete it? [Y/n]" Is this file correct, or is it something

Re: [arch-general] pacman: -Ss search results weird

2011-04-22 Thread Jonathan Beatty
On 04/22/2011 04:47 PM, Marek Otahal wrote: On Friday 22 of April 2011 23:23:03 Richard Schütz wrote: Am 22.04.2011 23:18, schrieb Marek Otahal: Hi, regarding the recent 'default syslog' discussion I wanted to check what is Arch up to now...I came to interesting results concerning pacman's sear