Re: [arch-general] HAL dependencies

2010-04-18 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
s likely to be considerable, due to the fact that architectural changes implemented at the maintenance stage will always be the largest, fixing a fault that annoys you, and I have never noticed... -- Laurie Clark-Michalek

Re: [arch-general] Howto handle poppler conflict with poppler-qt3

2010-03-10 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
On 10 March 2010 03:48, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 03/09/2010 05:02 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 10/03/10 08:58, David C. Rankin wrote: >>> Guys, >>> >>>     Latest updates to poppler require the removal of poppler-qt3 which >>> fails due to >>> kdemod3-kdegraphics-pdf (kpdf) dependencies. How do

Re: [arch-general] Does anybody still have kde3 running? libpng problems preventing apps from running?

2010-03-05 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
On 6 March 2010 00:22, Baho Utot wrote: > Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: > > > [putolin] > > >>>>  Wait.. someone who actually likes Konqueror? Why? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Because I can allow javascript per url. >>&g

Re: [arch-general] Does anybody still have kde3 running? libpng problems preventing apps from running?

2010-03-05 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
On 5 March 2010 09:48, Baho Utot wrote: > Brendan Long wrote: >> >> On 03/04/2010 05:22 PM, Baho Utot wrote: >> >>> >>> The only thing I really need from KDE is the  Konqueror web browser. >>> >> >>  Wait.. someone who actually likes Konqueror? Why? >> > > Because I can allow javascript per url. >

Re: [arch-general] Does anybody still have kde3 running? libpng problems preventing apps from running?

2010-03-04 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
On 4 March 2010 08:11, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 03/03/2010 10:15 PM, Sébastien Leblanc wrote: >> David, are you running kdemod-legacy? If not, you should try it. >> >> Sébastien Leblanc >> > > Sebastien > >        Yes, I'm running kdemod3-legacy. It has been really great for a long > time. (No

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
> Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around > for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it > something like "pacman -R --all !base"  would be nice > > -- Chris > pacman -R $(pacman -Qq | grep -v "$(pacman -Qqg base)") Though I havn't te

Re: [arch-general] kde44beta - 'virtuoso -t' grabbing ~80% of the CPU every few minutes

2010-02-05 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
On 5 February 2010 15:41, ludovic coues wrote: > Maybe virtuoso have trouble with the database. I've see a post on this mail > list or dev-archlinux where they are talking about some change in the > database format. I think this is the mail you're talking about: http://www.mail-archive.com/arch-d

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux and security - it needs some work

2010-02-01 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
first recommended Google search for SELinux was 'disabling'. -- Laurie Clark-Michalek

Re: [arch-general] A universal Operating System API - why don't we have it?

2009-12-21 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
2009/12/21 Frédéric Perrin : > Le lundi 21 à 18:57, Laurie Clark-Michalek a écrit : >> And on the anal sex point... actually, I think it'd be better for the >> convocation as a whole if we

Re: [arch-general] A universal Operating System API - why don't we have it?

2009-12-21 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
2009/12/21 Angel Velásquez : > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Laurie Clark-Michalek > wrote: >>>> You cannot write an >>>> application for windows and expect it to work on Linux. >> >> Java? The success of the language is based around the fact tha

Re: [arch-general] A universal Operating System API - why don't we have it?

2009-12-20 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
>> You cannot write an >> application for windows and expect it to work on Linux. Java? The success of the language is based around the fact that almost every computer has the runtime installed, regardless of operating system. Does that not count as a global API? Laurie

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-10-31 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
Can invitees invite? Anyway, I've heard that wave can get very cluttered. Nether the less, it's google! drool xD Who cares if they read the mails I send. Perhaps they'll realise how awesome I am and offer me a job :) An invite to bluepepp...@archlinux.us would be appreciated.