Re: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?

2016-08-18 Thread Lee Burton
It's always been my opinion that PowerShell (powerscript?) has been poorly named -- it's a lackluster /shell/ although things like psreadline,powershell_ise,etc make it less awful as a shell on windows but it's great as interpreted (ish -- see DLR/JIT) .NET -- you can compile C# inside of it or cal

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux support in puppet

2011-03-14 Thread Lee Burton
file. I agree with Aaron, that adding extra components to the Arch > runlevel would be something we should avoid. > > As for systemd, after working with the insides of Upstart, I am > VERY cautious about systemd, and I am honestly a little upset about it, I > don't like the idea that Red Hat changing the runlevel space could pressure > us into having to use systemd, I like the Arch runlevel the way it is, and I > think that managing service startup with something like systemd will most > likely be a bad thing. But I have not spent as much time as I should with > systemd to make a final conclusion there. > But regardless, this should support the Arch style runlevel. > > I do think that if it is possible to determine the ordering based on the > requires statements of other services that would be great, or maybe even to > implicitly state the index of the service: > > index => 4, > > would set the value as the 4th thing to start. > -- Lee Burton lbur...@mrow.org 301 910 0246

Re: [arch-general] Syncing the mirrors

2010-02-04 Thread Lee Burton
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 15:57, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 02/04/2010 09:42 PM, Lee Burton wrote: >> It probably is.  Perhaps a push-primary solution (much simpler..) >> combined with a default twice a day sync (just to make sure?) for >> tier-1 mirrors might work.. the I bel

Re: [arch-general] Syncing the mirrors

2010-02-04 Thread Lee Burton
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 14:40, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:27:14 -0500 > Lee Burton wrote: > >> To make it "multi-tiered" and to reduce load on the primary mirror >> could have slightly more intelligent polling than just checking one >> ups

Re: [arch-general] Syncing the mirrors

2010-02-04 Thread Lee Burton
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:53, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 02/03/2010 03:12 PM, Lee Burton wrote: >> As for push mirroring, http://www.debian.org/mirror/push_server is a >> decent example >> An identity file with >> no-port-forwarding,no-X11-forwarding,no-agent-forwardi

Re: [arch-general] Syncing the mirrors

2010-02-03 Thread Lee Burton
ort/atomic-rsync As for push mirroring, http://www.debian.org/mirror/push_server is a decent example An identity file with no-port-forwarding,no-X11-forwarding,no-agent-forwarding,no-pty,command="/path/to/mirror/script",from="IPADDRESS" &" Is fairly decent.. --- L

Re: [arch-general] Wiki/AUR Mirrors

2008-11-02 Thread Lee Burton
anted to open a discussion about the > > possibility of mirroring the wiki/aur. I'm sure the are many people among > > the community (including myself) who'd be willing to put forth some hosting. > I still have a nice server. I'd be pleased to contribute this way! > >