Hi,
I'm part of the Paktahn development team; Paktahn is a yaourt-like
frontend to Arch package management written in Common Lisp.
At the moment SBCL is our main deployment Lisp, and we depend on
the 1.0.32 release of SBCL because this release includes a critical
patch.
We have noticed that SBC
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:03:26PM -0500, kludge wrote:
> alright, alright, ya' got me. the best jokes contain a kernel of truth,
> and this one hit real close to home.
>
> i maintain the basic premise of leslie's comment (serious or not)
> is widely held and fundamentally bad for the world.
Y
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 02:35:34PM -0500, kludge wrote:
>
> >> Yeah, you better do.
> >>
> >> It's about time the obsolete i686 branch vanished. Everyone who's
> >> still wanting it must be a weenie, and there's no place for those
> >> in the Arch philosophy -- go try Redhat or something.
> >>
> >
> I doubt that, besides I'm currently using Arch on my eeePC and even if I
> get a new (64 bits) computer anytime soon, I won't maintain two different
> distro on both computers. So I'm looking for a new distro to replace Arch.
Yeah, you better do.
It's about time the obsolete i686 branch vanish
> There is this wiki page that has (or started?) put together guidelines
> for the packaging of lisp packages.
Interesting, thanks.
This page is a bit eclectic right now.
Gentoo has an excellent one in its Wiki:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/common-lisp/guide.xml
In my opinion the firs
I've noticed that the Arch Haskell community has made astonishing
progress with their packages.
I think it would be nice to have the same for Common Lisp.
Would anyone be interested in devising a packaging system
that works with multiple Lisps?
Cheers,
Leslie
--
LinkedIn Profile: http:
6 matches
Mail list logo
