Re: [arch-general] perl-xml-parser vs. perlxml: dependency probs

Andrea Scarpino wrote: > No problem, I was waiting for a fix by Francois, but this issue was > becoming confusing. > All should be fixed now. > Yep, you're right. perl-xml-parser-2.36.6 just entered [extra]. I installed it and everything is hunky-dorey again. Thanks!

Re: [arch-general] perl-xml-parser vs. perlxml: dependency probs

Andrea Scarpino wrote: > I am fixing this...wait for -6 in [extra] and -7 in [testing] > Thank you, Andrea. I knew somebody was on the case. Sorry if I sounded impatient, especially for something that wasn't a show-stopper. I just get all anxious if I can run pacman -Syu (which I do far to

Re: [arch-general] perl-xml-parser vs. perlxml: dependency probs

Colby W. wrote: > >> You're not the only one. >> >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20029 >> Apparently the perl-xml-parser-2.36.5 (now in [testing]) will fix this. Should I force installation of the testing package, though? When I try, I'm getting "... exists in filesystem" warnings. I ge

Re: [arch-general] perl-xml-parser vs. perlxml: dependency probs

Colby W. wrote: > You're not the only one. > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20029 > wrote: >> Is anybody else getting dependency errors involving the >> attempted replacement of perlxml by perl-xml-parser? >> >> I've got libxml-perl and perl-sml-dom both requiring >> perlxml, thus stopping

[arch-general] perl-xml-parser vs. perlxml: dependency probs

Is anybody else getting dependency errors involving the attempted replacement of perlxml by perl-xml-parser? I've got libxml-perl and perl-sml-dom both requiring perlxml, thus stopping the replacement. Should I just sit tight and let the backroom boyz fix it?