Re: [arch-general] How do AUR packages get new maintainers?

2010-09-22 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 22-09-2010 15:21, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: On 09/21/2010 10:07 PM, Mario Figueiredo wrote: On 21-09-2010 23:17, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: On 09/21/2010 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: Guys, I've seen recent "Request to Ophan package XYZ" posts, and I've found s

Re: [arch-general] How do AUR packages get new maintainers?

2010-09-21 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 21-09-2010 23:17, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: On 09/21/2010 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: Guys, I've seen recent "Request to Ophan package XYZ" posts, and I've found some fairly large AUR packages that are orphaned (like RPM5). But, how do AUR packages get new maintainers? Does somebo

Re: [arch-general] sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?

2010-09-07 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 07-09-2010 20:19, David C. Rankin wrote: Thanks guys, I guess I'll transition to sudo from wheel or just implement the sudo group in addition to wheel so I can use it in the future changing a decade+ of mental inertia that says wheel. It is funny how we really are creatures of habit :

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [ANNOUNCEMENT DRAFT] True multilib for Arch Linux x86_64

2010-08-26 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 26-08-2010 23:09, Thomas Bächler wrote: [multilib] Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist Also planning a a multilib-testing?

Re: [arch-general] Fw: [arch-dev-public] [staging] repository: Let's give it a try!

2010-08-12 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 11-08-2010 18:03, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:41:06 +0100, Mario Figueiredo wrote: This would definitely get me interested in Testing. Right now my Linux knowledge is limited and thus Testing is a no-go zone. If however I could have a guarantee that Testing offers the

[arch-general] Fw: [arch-dev-public] [staging] repository: Let's give it a try!

2010-08-11 Thread Mario Figueiredo
Forward Rationale: To give end users (and potential devs) an opportunity to discuss this too. On 11-08-2010 16:29, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Hi devs, my last attempt for this didn't get much feedback so I try to keep it short this time...for more details see the old thread at: http://mailman.arch

Re: [arch-general] [OT] sight-saver colours

2010-08-06 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 06-08-2010 12:27, Jan Steffens wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:10 PM, F. Gr. wrote: Hi, in your opinion, what is the best combination of text and background colour so as not to tire our eyes? I think we spend many hours in front of a monitor. I've been using the following one: text

[arch-general] Lynx package lacks documentation

2010-08-05 Thread Mario Figueiredo
URI in HELPFILE invalid and turn lynx help inoperative, until a package with the new version is made available or the user takes corrective measures (they either build from source themselves or download the old version help files to their system). Mario Figueiredo

[arch-general] test - please ignore

2010-08-05 Thread Mario Figueiredo
Test. Please ignore -- Mário Figueiredo, Quiettech, Quiet Technologies Development Services and Research Phone: +351 214451247 Mobile: +351 926682351 Email: mario.figueir...@quiettech.org www.quiettech.org

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 03-08-2010 21:35, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:40:20 +0200 schrieb Attila: It's so simple and every Linux user should or must know this. If a daemon or any other software is updated it must be restarted either to use the new version or to get it working if the running version bro

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

2010-08-03 Thread Mario Figueiredo
On 03-08-2010 16:14, Simon Stoakley wrote: On 03/08/10 09:51, Evangelos Foutras wrote: 2010/8/3 Lukáš Jirkovský: On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches. I already have .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great. greeting