Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Changes to microcode updates

2014-10-23 Thread Neitsab
On 2014-10-23 00:45 (UTC+2) Genes Lists wrote: On 10/23/2014 06:34 PM, Jody Allen wrote: ... > Is anyone only having one core updated? I get this: > > dmesg | grep microcode > [0.00] CPU0 microcode updated early to revision 0x29, date = > 2013-06-12 > [0.344194] microcode: CPU0 s

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Changes to microcode updates

2014-10-23 Thread Neitsab
Le 23/10/2014 02:01, Marko Hauptvogel a écrit : > Referring to the comments from october 16th on the ck kernel package > page [0] and the config of said package [1], your version of the ck > kernel has not yet been configured to do early microcode updates. But > this should follow be fixed soon as

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Changes to microcode updates

2014-10-22 Thread Neitsab
Le 21/10/2014, Mike Cloaked a écrit: > There are suggested > methods to implement early microcode loading for the other main bootloaders > in the arch wiki, but until now for refind it seems not to have been > verified to work. It would be nice to see verification that early microcode > loading has

[arch-general] systemd timers: switch default target to timers.target?

2014-10-04 Thread Neitsab
mers are implemented. I'd like to discuss whether Arch should switch default timers target for packages in base group from multi-user.target to timers.target, possibly doing so for other packages in official repos. Cheers, Neitsab

Re: [arch-general] owncloud: incorrect dependencies in PKGBUILD

2014-08-14 Thread Neitsab
On Wed Aug 13 12:47:49 EDT 2014, Yamakaky wrote: >> The rest is still relevant though: updated uWSGI ownCloud working config >> would be __much__ appreciated! > > Sadly, my raspberry pi is officially down at home, so I need to wait two > weeks to give you my working config. No problem, thanks a

Re: [arch-general] owncloud: incorrect dependencies in PKGBUILD

2014-08-13 Thread Neitsab
Le 13/08/2014 17:57, Neitsab a écrit : > ... > * how do you start the uwsgi process (the wiki mentions a systemd unit > file and Emperor but doesn't explain the need for those...)? Etc. > Ok, please ignore this point as I have found relevant info in the wiki [1] (stupid me for

Re: [arch-general] owncloud: incorrect dependencies in PKGBUILD

2014-08-13 Thread Neitsab
pass directive: is TCP socket required by OC or can we replace it by a unix socket (like it seems to be by default in uwsgi doc [2])? * how do you start the uwsgi process (the wiki mentions a systemd unit file and Emperor but doesn't explain the need for those...)? Etc. Thanks already,

Re: [arch-general] owncloud: incorrect dependencies in PKGBUILD

2014-07-30 Thread Neitsab
> I use it personally. It's plays the same role as php-fpm, but it's > better (I think) and can be used with python, php, ruby and cgi. I need > to update the wiki because the instructions are not correct. > Alright, I see, thanks. Concerning the wiki update, please do so. I'm currently struggl

Re: [arch-general] owncloud: incorrect dependencies in PKGBUILD

2014-07-30 Thread Neitsab
hat it is and that it isn't mentioned in the official admin manual I left it out. If somebody has a more definitive answer about the need to include it or not... --Neitsab [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Owncloud#Nginx_.2B_uwsgi_php_configuration

Re: [arch-general] owncloud: incorrect dependencies in PKGBUILD

2014-07-29 Thread Neitsab
Le 29/07/2014 17:35, Florian Pritz a écrit : > On 29.07.2014 12:49, Neitsab wrote: >> I had a go at an amended PKGBUILD, please find it below. Tell me if this >> is better suited as a bug report. > > Yes, please create a bug report for such issues. > Thanks, done: ht

[arch-general] owncloud: incorrect dependencies in PKGBUILD

2014-07-29 Thread Neitsab
Hi everybody, Today I was looking at the installation of ownCloud on my home Arch server, and I noticed one of the optional dependencies returned by pacman (php-imagick) couldn't be found in the official repos. Turns out it's in the AUR [1]. Arch packages' owncloud webpage mentions "(virtual)" nex

[arch-general] [vte3] Wrong permissions for /etc/profile.d/vte.sh ?

2014-07-29 Thread Neitsab
> On 22/07/14 09:55 AM, Neitsab wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As I was checking some stuff about environment variables, I noticed that >> I have one file in /etc/profile.d which doesn't have the same perms as >> the others: >> >> $ ls -la /etc/profile.d/ &

[arch-general] [vte3] Wrong permissions for /etc/profile.d/vte.sh ?

2014-07-22 Thread Neitsab
Hi, As I was checking some stuff about environment variables, I noticed that I have one file in /etc/profile.d which doesn't have the same perms as the others: $ ls -la /etc/profile.d/ total 72 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 19 juil. 20:36 . drwxr-xr-x 91 root root 4096 22 juil. 15:04 .. -rwxr-xr-x

Re: [arch-general] LibreOffice changes: dependencies, 'Fresh' branch & misguiding package names

2014-06-22 Thread Neitsab
On 2014-06-22 13:25, Doug Newgard wrote: > On 2014-06-22 12:08, Neitsab wrote: >> What confuses me is that it seems current Arch-provided >> libreoffice-common is already built from upstream "Fresh" branch, as >> package version 4.2.5 matches the one announced upstr

[arch-general] LibreOffice changes: dependencies, 'Fresh' branch & misguiding package names

2014-06-22 Thread Neitsab
ce-fresh" and "libreoffice-fresh-prerelease"), and there is no version built from the "Stable" branch (v. 4.1.6). Could somebody shed some light about this situation, and is some kind of announcement planned so that users do not suddenly realize they switched software branc