Le 23/10/2014 02:01, Marko Hauptvogel a écrit :
Referring to the comments from october 16th on the ck kernel package
page [0] and the config of said package [1], your version of the ck
kernel has not yet been configured to do early microcode updates. But
this should follow be fixed soon as the
Le 21/10/2014, Mike Cloaked a écrit:
There are suggested
methods to implement early microcode loading for the other main bootloaders
in the arch wiki, but until now for refind it seems not to have been
verified to work. It would be nice to see verification that early microcode
loading has
default timers target for packages in base group from multi-user.target
to timers.target, possibly doing so for other packages in official repos.
Cheers,
Neitsab
On Wed Aug 13 12:47:49 EDT 2014, Yamakaky wrote:
The rest is still relevant though: updated uWSGI ownCloud working config
would be __much__ appreciated!
Sadly, my raspberry pi is officially down at home, so I need to wait two
weeks to give you my working config.
No problem, thanks a lot
: is TCP socket required by OC or can we replace
it by a unix socket (like it seems to be by default in uwsgi doc [2])?
* how do you start the uwsgi process (the wiki mentions a systemd unit
file and Emperor but doesn't explain the need for those...)? Etc.
Thanks already,
Neitsab
[1]
https
Le 13/08/2014 17:57, Neitsab a écrit :
...
* how do you start the uwsgi process (the wiki mentions a systemd unit
file and Emperor but doesn't explain the need for those...)? Etc.
Ok, please ignore this point as I have found relevant info in the wiki
[1] (stupid me for not looking
mentioned in the official admin manual I left it out.
If somebody has a more definitive answer about the need to include it or
not...
--Neitsab
[1]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Owncloud#Nginx_.2B_uwsgi_php_configuration
I use it personally. It's plays the same role as php-fpm, but it's
better (I think) and can be used with python, php, ruby and cgi. I need
to update the wiki because the instructions are not correct.
Alright, I see, thanks. Concerning the wiki update, please do so. I'm
currently struggling
On 22/07/14 09:55 AM, Neitsab wrote:
Hi,
As I was checking some stuff about environment variables, I noticed that
I have one file in /etc/profile.d which doesn't have the same perms as
the others:
$ ls -la /etc/profile.d/
total 72
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 19 juil. 20:36 .
drwxr-xr
Hi everybody,
Today I was looking at the installation of ownCloud on my home Arch
server, and I noticed one of the optional dependencies returned by
pacman (php-imagick) couldn't be found in the official repos. Turns out
it's in the AUR [1]. Arch packages' owncloud webpage mentions
(virtual) next
Le 29/07/2014 17:35, Florian Pritz a écrit :
On 29.07.2014 12:49, Neitsab wrote:
I had a go at an amended PKGBUILD, please find it below. Tell me if this
is better suited as a bug report.
Yes, please create a bug report for such issues.
Thanks, done: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41381.
Hi,
As I was checking some stuff about environment variables, I noticed that
I have one file in /etc/profile.d which doesn't have the same perms as
the others:
$ ls -la /etc/profile.d/
total 72
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 19 juil. 20:36 .
drwxr-xr-x 91 root root 4096 22 juil. 15:04 ..
somebody shed some light about this situation, and is some kind of
announcement planned so that users do not suddenly realize they switched
software branch? I couldn't find any info in May/June arch-general and
arch-dev-public archives.
Regards,
Neitsab
[1]
https
On 2014-06-22 13:25, Doug Newgard wrote:
On 2014-06-22 12:08, Neitsab wrote:
What confuses me is that it seems current Arch-provided
libreoffice-common is already built from upstream Fresh branch, as
package version 4.2.5 matches the one announced upstream (release
announcement [3
14 matches
Mail list logo
