Any particular reason you cross-posted this between aur-general and
arch-general?
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 03:59 +0100, Seblu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It was a few things I could not explain with bluez and udev.
>
> When my system start killswitch off and i toggle killswitch after,
> bluetoothd is auto
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 22:41 +0800, 郑文辉 wrote:
> I have reported a bug report FS#23295[1] ,should I send an email in
> arch-general mailling list too?
>
> [1]:https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23295
Not necessary, flyspray is the way to go.
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 01:33 +0100, Linas wrote:
> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Dedicated to the relatively-closed and more-constrained version of whats
> > in the repos. Sure =)
> >
> > The distros have jumped fast, but I'm wondering about the Windows users
> > o
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 10:22 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> 2011/3/7 Ng Oon-Ee :
> > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> >> just an fyi,
> >> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
> >> the aur, it will most
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> just an fyi,
> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
> the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it
> takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a better version
> of openof
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 14:20 +0800, 郑文辉 wrote:
> Sorry,my fault,i was too careless to read the aur-general as the
> arch-general in AUR-FAQ wiki page.
And you should really reply by bottom-posting =)
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 05:17 +0200, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:51 AM, 郑文辉 wrote:
> > I'd like to take over the maintaince of perl-convert-tnef,as the current
> > maintainer seems no longer focusing on it,so i hope this aur package can be
> > orphaned .
>
> Done, thanks!
R
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 23:05 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 02/03/11 22:52, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm not a coder, but I've written up .service files (for systemd) for
> > netcfg, specifically for net-auto-wired and net-auto-wireless. I have
>
Hi all,
I'm not a coder, but I've written up .service files (for systemd) for
netcfg, specifically for net-auto-wired and net-auto-wireless. I have
not done the same for net-profiles and net-rename.
I was thinking to submit those two files upstream to netcfg development,
but I can't seem to find
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 12:50 +0530, Keerthan jai.c wrote:
> Why can't we do this?
>
> 1) Keep hashes of {core,extra,community,multilib}.db in plaintext in
> keys.archlinux.org or something
> 2) while syncing pacman compares the hashes of the downloaded dbs from the
> main server ensuring that the p
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 16:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 26/02/11 16:15, Andres Perera wrote:
> > lol...
> >
> > gsoc students aren't going to get sponsored for making packages
> >
> > you'd have to be in a distro that does their own projects like fedora
> >
> > it'd be like slackware asking for
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 21:45 +0100, Sebastian Rust wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 21.02.2011 00:28, David C. Rankin wrote:
> >>> The question is "Can I do something in the PKGBUILD to tell pacman
> >>> - if the file is already there -> overwrite it?"
> Ah ok, now I
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:19 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 09:33 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > So there is definitely a problem with gcc 4.5.2
> > (g++).
>
> Correction,
>
> There was a definite problem with the Trinity code after
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 16:18 +0800, Thomas Dean wrote:
> >
> > It probably loads the pcspkr module. Adding !pcspkr to the modules array
> > in rc.conf might fix it. Otherwise, a rmmod pcspkr in a post-sleep hook
> > in /etc/pm/sleep.d/50-pcspkr (chmod +x it) might workaround it.
>
> The only mudule
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 00:52 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> Hi,
> i was a bit to excited by the new gtk3 released and i moved it to
> testing without realizing that the new application lookup that comes
> with it would break gnome 2.32 handling applications badly.
>
> Please revert back to core/extra
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 09/02/11 20:46, Allan McRae wrote:
> > Have not had time to look into this, but I get this error with the
> > kernel26 PKGBUILD in Arch Linux [core] repo:
> >
>
> umm.. wrong list :P
>
Allan broke it!
I saw a pidgin update (2.7.10) and while downloading I thought I'd check
the changelog.
Go to pidgin.im, and the most recent version is 2.7.9.
Its official, Arch Linux devs are faster than upstream!
Shout-out to Ionut Biru and indeed to all the devs who make Arch Linux
great =)
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:26 +0100, Olivier Keun | CAPSTONE wrote:
> I also have no problem with other distros using Arch as a basis, but the
> problem is that it causes a pretty big influx of newbies who have no idea
> how to configure and maintain Arch since they installed a one-click
> installer.
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:07 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 10:51 AM, Olivier Keun wrote:
> >
> > What are your thoughts about this? I'm hoping to get an official reaction
> > from our dev-team, so we can avoid some of the confusion that is present
> > now.
> >
>
> there is nothing wrong
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:37 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix is committed to
> >> upstream git. All users should downgr
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix is committed to
> upstream git. All users should downgrade to the version in [core].
>
> Allan
While I understand why Allan did this, shouldn't this be unnecessary for
the [testing] repo?
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:45 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 31 January 2011 17:45, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > I can't imagine a user waiting for a updated package of foo when there
> > is a new version out and he wants to rebuild. (He just does that
> > himself)
> >
> > To rest my case, i think th
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 17:21 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 31/01/11 16:27, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > This is more a general question, I understand abs is updated every 24
> > hours. Would more regular updates (say, every 1 hour or so) be better?
> >
> > Currently, for those
This is more a general question, I understand abs is updated every 24
hours. Would more regular updates (say, every 1 hour or so) be better?
Currently, for those (like me) who compulsively update, abs is pretty
much guaranteed to be behind the latest packages in any mirror (by a max
of 24 hours).
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:38 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
> > On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin
> > wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > >As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I
> > have
> > > been keeping not
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 07:36 -0700, Sergey Manucharian wrote:
> Excerpts from Ionuț Bîru's message of Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:57 +0200:
>
> > and with this, i rest my case. Cherry picking from testing is wrong
> > and it should be all or nothing approach.
>
> I agree in general, but IMHO the kernel is
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 14:28 +0100, Vlad George wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:21:38PM +0800, doherty pete wrote:
> > i just down from kernel.org adn install it
> CLASSIC!
You gotta love one-word replies. Especially with the over-use of
punctuation.
Methinks the OP woul
I can't download it from the website either. Probably the mirror didn't
completely sync?
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 10:36 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Monday 24 January 2011 10:19:02 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 10:12 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday 24 January 2011 10:06:18 Ray Rashif wrote:
> > > > Guy
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 10:12 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 24 January 2011 10:06:18 Ray Rashif wrote:
> > Guys..I don't think anyone has to tell you this but such invites are
> > _always_ unintended. E-mail services have a bad tendency to
> > automatically insert contacts into your fri
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 13:58 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Saturday, January 22, 2011 01:28:50 pm Geoffrey Teale wrote:
> > 2011/1/22 Yaro Kasear
> >
> > > On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:09:22 am Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > &g
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500,
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
>
> Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the
> word
> "my" and if you are a c
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 13:43 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:36:45 +0100
> Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > Secondly on the forums probably the trolls won't reply ;)
>
> afaik forums contains more trolls then mailing list.
Probably in number, but I'd wager that replies are
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 03:18 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:11:40 +0800
> schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
>
> > Specifically on this topic, I've noticed that the latest Ubuntu
> > (which I setup on an old laptop for someone else) boots up REALLY
> > fast
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 03:07 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> I'm quite satisfied with the current sysv init. It does everything
> which is needed to be done at boottime. And the init process simply is
> only for booting the system and for nothing else.
>
> Btw., Ubuntu with its upstart or systemd is
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:55 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:48:14 pm Sander Jansen wrote:
> (snip)
> >
> > - It's nice you can install it next to sysv-init. This makes it really
> > easy to test without breaking the system.
>
> You can do this? I might try it out. If
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:25 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> I, personally, have never worked with him. I have seen enough criticism of
> Pulse Audio, for example, getting handwaved and pinned on someone else's
> project. I think about it logically:
>
> If it works fine with ALSA, why did it inexpli
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 01:59 +0530, Piyush P Kurur wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:10:19PM -0500,
> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
> wrote:
> >
> > > A quick search in google reveals that he spammed it across lists of
> > > nume
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:52 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> I was ALMOST behind a switch to systemd until I found out the guy behind it
> is
> Lennart Poettering. Now we can expect a half-broken init system that'll be in
> perpetual beta, and more passing off the buck on bug reports to
> distributi
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:34 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> 2011/1/20 Ng Oon-Ee :
> > That would be me. This above only holds if we don't utilize the
> > initscripts, right? I understood from the forum thread that using those
> > there'd be 'no turning back
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:11 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been working on integration of Arch and Systemd.
Very much appreciated, thank you!
>
> Regarding people who are worried about getting an unbootable system:
> systemd and sysvinit can (and should) be installed in pa
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 17:22 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> > Le mercredi 19 janvier 2011 16:02:52, C Anthony Risinger a écrit :
> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:59 PM, C Anthony Risinger
> > wrote:
> >> > Any ideas when will Arch switch to
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 06:23 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Boy, what's an opportunity to exercise my typing. I'm working in tty
> now. :-(
>
> Is there any way to use cut-and-paste to compile the list and then to
> copy it into a command line?
>
You could pipe the list of installed packages
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 21:17 -0300, Martin wrote:
> libreoffice-extension-presenter-screen is just the Presenter Console
> extension, right? It seems to me that it is not working at all, since it
> is not showed under extensions-manager plus using Impress through a
> DataShow makes no change.
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:59 -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/16/2011 12:43 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
> {snip}
>
> > In general, if I need to make a package, I copy
> > a random PKGBUILD from abs, change the top couple lines, and then set
> > the b
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:33 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 16.01.2011 15:25, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
> > In reference to the below:- [testing] is still 'safe' for those using
> > networkmanager?
>
> What I wrote was wrong, I pushed those packages to stagin
In reference to the below:- [testing] is still 'safe' for those using
networkmanager? In my understanding libnl1 would work like libpng12 from
the AUR so it shouldn't stop working, is that correct?
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:18 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> I am uploading i686 packages for the f
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:22 +0100, Frédéric Perrin wrote:
> Le dimanche 16 à 2:01, Allan McRae a écrit :
> > There has been low interest in a real database solution due to
> > potential issues recovering from corrupt databases and with the
> > additional dependencies.
>
> A question from a rando
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:53 +1000, Joker-jar wrote:
> Why makepkg --source makes empty folder "src"? Is it necessary?
man makepkg
Search for the term '--source'
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 00:25 -0300, dario wrote:
> Hi, i have a problem with my monitor, since when upgraded with pacman
> -Syu then when reboot the PC i could not start Arch, but if in fallback.
> Since my monitor flashes almost second. Then i don't know because walked
> in normal mode but continue
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 09:26 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 22:39:30 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > FWIW, on Gnome that directory seems ignored (at least wicd-gtk doesn't
> > start up here). Pretty much par for the course for XDG complaince,
> > then
&
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 22:02 +, Meyithi wrote:
> On 13 January 2011 21:58, Peter Lewis wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >
> > I don't know much about XDG, but I was trying to figure out why every time
> > I
> > started up a desktop session (KDE) wicd-tray was being loaded, when I
> > didn't
> > want it to be.
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:37 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/11/2011 05:27 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Yes, why don't we tweak upstream so that an unsupported older version
> > can run alongside.
> >
> > Nothing against kde3, but if you want to use older ver
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 17:01 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
>
> Ultimately though, there is still the question of "why on Arch?" to be
> answered. When I find the culprit, I'll pass it on so we can revisit whether
> there is something in how k4 is packaged for Arch needs tweaking.
>
Yes, why don'
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 10:50 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 06.01.2011 00:51, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
> > Devs,
> >
> > Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's
> > without it for a while now.
>
> Let's disable it and see how long it takes for people to notice that
> t
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 19:45 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 07:23 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Monaco
> > wrote:
> >> Devs,
> >>
> >> Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's without
> >> it for a while now.
> >>
> >
>
Hi, I noticed that said package is out of date, am attaching a slightly
updated PKGBUILD for the latest version here (compiles and runs fine on
my machine x86_64).
Normally I'd wait, but the maintainer is Aaron and as I understand he's
not very active round these parts anymore.
P.S. - hope the at
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 22:50 +0800, Wang Bo wrote:
> Great job.
>
> I have a question. My kword does not work very well with *.doc files. I
> installed KDE and then kword. But when I tried to open a doc file, there
> is a message of "Not a valid koffice file".
>
> Has anyone ever encountered t
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 22:42 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 08:17 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
> > Maybe you need to spend a bit more time with your problems before posting
> > on the
> > ML. Use the bbs for general support questions. You've had 4 threads in the
> > past
> > 3 days!
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 00:17 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 11:47 PM, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
> > Probably many of you know about the acquisition of 882 of Novell's
> > patents by a Microsoft organized consortium [1].
> >
> >
> > Armando
>
> stop spreading FUD
>
The more paranoia and
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 01:48 -0700, Jeff Cook wrote:
> >> > Really please, please don't top post.
> >> > http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
> >>
> >> Who cares! it takes too long to scroll down through the past fifteen
> >> generations to get to the relevant part of the message.
> >
> > Wel
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:06 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 12/07/2010 08:02 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 18:49 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> >> On 12/07/2010 06:44 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:07 +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
> &g
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 18:49 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 12/07/2010 06:44 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:07 +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
> >> Packages moved from staging to testing.
> >>
> >> OpenOffice-base-{beta,devel} will get rebuilt wh
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:07 +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Packages moved from staging to testing.
>
> OpenOffice-base-{beta,devel} will get rebuilt whit the next upstream
> update. Go-OpenOffice has been removed from the extra repo.
>
> Community packages sword+yaz still need to be rebuilt.
>
>
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:24 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > Top posting vs. going off topic without changing subject lines. I'm not
> > sure which is worse...
> >
>
> Bottom posting in Gmail is a pain in the ass. --Kaiting.
>
1. Click 'Reply
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:27 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
> > Really please, please don't top post.
> > http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
>
> Who cares! it takes too long to scroll down through the past fifteen
> generations to get to the relevant part of the message.
If you're posting on
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 21:09 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:
> >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but if pulseaudio is installed, I believe you
> >> should be able to prevent it from startin
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:41 +0100, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Sander Jansen wrote:
> > 2010/11/29 "Jérôme M. Berger" :
> >>This bug is even worse for me: the only output that PA will
> >> recognize on my system is the HDMI output from my *video* card! I
> >> don't have any HDMI capable per
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 01:00 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 11:07 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> > I'd like to encourage you to perform several searches in different
> > places before asking any question on the mailing list. Ideally, such
> > trivial questions should never be asked on the li
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:21 +0100, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> > feedback on this.
> >
> > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
> >
> > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running
> > Puls
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:21 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:09 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > I guess I am one of those pulse-haters. I don't care whether it's in
> > [extra], some other official repo or not since I simply don't need it.
> > But now mplayer pulls in libp
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 01:10 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:28:45AM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> > The ONLY major ALSA 'feature' which is not supported is memmap. Direct
> > access to the sound-card's memory. Pulseaudio's devs a
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 10:38 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 00:27 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> GNOME 3 isn't even released yet. There's no CURRENT dependency in Arch,
> in [extra], for Pulse Audio.
Others have explained this to you already.
>
> Fin
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 10:18 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 00:15 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> > On 29 November 2010 00:08, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > > Once again, I say PA is far from the kind of quality I'd expect from a
> > > package in [extra], and I'm surprised the Arch devs are
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:49 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 28 November 2010 11:24, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 11:17 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 18:21 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> >> > I don't see KDE upstream doing that.
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 18:21 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 08:18 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Just don't use Gnome. Upstream is going to make Pulseaudio default. KDE
> > as well, maybe.
> >
> I don't see KDE upstream doing that. They have Ph
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 19:34 -0200, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> My experience is that pulseaudio sometimes works for simple desktop audio.
> Any serious work with audio it just cause (or potentially cause) problems...
> (again, just my experience)
if (serious audio work); then
pulseaudio -k; jackd
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 13:01 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Philipp Überbacher
> > Gnome isn't Linux, Gnome is primarily a DAU-top. I don't see why gnome
> > should govern the direction of every distribution. Yes, ubuntu decided
> > that they want to follow and b
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 12:09 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>
> I stated it before, but I'll say it here, I don't think Pulse Audio is
> right for [extra]. Compiz is a lot more stable and still manages to stay
> in [community]. Pulse goes down a lot and takes sound with it and it's
> getting put in [ex
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:55 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 06:30:36 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered
> > > >> for an eventual default by chance?
> > > >
> >
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:33 +, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 27-11-2010 01:18, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
> >> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> >> feedback on this.
> >>
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:02 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered
> >> for an eventual default by chance?
> >
> > Almost noth
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> feedback on this.
>
> This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
>
> So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running
> PulseAudio.
Smallish
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 18:46 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
> > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> > feedback on this.
> >
> > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
> >
> > So I'm asking for it now,
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> feedback on this.
>
> This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
>
> So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running
> PulseAudio.
Been usin
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:47 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2010 16:37:41 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> > If some says "this is shame", "I'm leaving",
> > "you suck", "developers are selfish", you could certainly discard
> > them, but not I or Heiko, we just talk about our opinion.
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 00:08 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On (11/15/10 09:05), Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> -~> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:39 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> -~> > On (11/14/10 14:05), Isaac Dupree wrote:
> -~> > -~> On 11/14/10 09:32, Jim Pryor wrote:
> -~> >
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:39 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On (11/14/10 14:05), Isaac Dupree wrote:
> -~> On 11/14/10 09:32, Jim Pryor wrote:
> -~> >...
> -~> >
> -~> >I would certainly understand and could not reasonably object to any
> -~> >distro's demoting dcron to an unofficial package. But as I
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> And I have nothing against cleaning up a repo. But this should be done
> more considered. Means only unimportant, unpopular packages or packages
> which don't run anymore should be moved to AUR or removed completely but
> not packages which
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 13:46 +0800, Gergely Imreh wrote:
> On 12 November 2010 13:32, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> >I'm using yum-createrepo 0.9.8-3 on from AUR and suddenly my
> > createrepo updates
> > on my Arch server are failing with the following error:
> >
> > 23:22 nirv
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 16:31 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Not only this, but also the fact that now there are 2 crons being maintained:
> fcron in community and dcron in core. Removing dcron to, say, AUR, will be a
> wiser use of devs' time...
Bottom-posting please. And I don't see a problem with t
Hi all,
I don't actually recall when this started happening, but somewhere along
the line g-p-m started directly performing a suspend without going
through the pm-suspend script. I have some scripts in /etc/pm/sleep.d
that are run when I do 'sudo pm-suspend', but aren't run when I do a
suspend fro
Wasn't there a successor or replacement to abs in the works? A git-based
one, I believe? (maybe I'm creating false memories?)
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:40 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone wanted to maintain the following packages:
>
> heimdal, db: I maintain these on
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 22:42 -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 10:37 PM, Jason Reardon wrote:
> > I'm somewhat of a mailing list lurker. I've read before that one thing Arch
> > is lacking in are normal users testing packages. So, I wrote a script to
> > install packages from testing when
lowyat fellas, all Ubuntu/Fedora as
well).
Your question isn't really suitable for this list though. I'm sure
there's some FAQ or related on distrowatch detailing the process.
Cheers,
Ng Oon-Ee
P.S. - oh, having 1Malaysia on a Linux distro is a bit too nationalistic
I think =). Linux is worldwide, after all.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 27/10/10 13:25, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Bächler
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 26.10.2010 03:38, schrieb Allan McRae:
>>>>
>>>> Another day, anot
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 26.10.2010 03:38, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> Another day, another glibc...
>>
>> This adjusts the static linking fix. The one previously used is a more
>> correct fix but appears incomplete. I have replaced this by a hack fix
>> that Fedora
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 22:50 +0530, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't agree that python 3 is ready for mass use yet. I think arch
> made a premature switch.
>
> Hence, I am not upgrading my system. I hope archlinux rollbacks python3
> update.
>
> Regards,
> Gary
"Hey look, devs did something
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 10:00 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 02:51 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Scratch that, it does work after all. Didn't realize that I neglected to
> > kill the OOO launcher in the taskbar before testing...
> >
>
> Now that's t
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 14:24 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:06, Ray Rashif wrote:
> > On 15 October 2010 18:37, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >> I have a tree of packages, organised similarly to ABS, i.e. directory
> >> names match package name, and in each directory is a PK
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
