On Sep 2, 2015 9:29 AM, "edson duarte" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> hi!
>
> pacman reports that the repositories are up to date for a couple of
> weeks now with no errors or warnings and this had never happened, i've
> tried looking in the forums and the news on
On Oct 2, 2012 7:15 PM, "nailz" wrote:
>
> On 3 October 2012 00:18, Your Real Name wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:29:38PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > > On 01/10/12 20:23, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, gt wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:49:05AM
On Sep 29, 2012 10:26 PM, "Oon-Ee Ng" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ...sometimes I want to contact the
> > devs to bring something up or ask a question on it.
>
> There's a bug tracker where you can directly contact maintainers, for
> bugs/feature
On Aug 16, 2012 10:04 PM, "Justin Strickland"
wrote:
>
> A better solution would be for you to reinstall with a clean pure
install,
> then install systemd, and see if you run into the same solution which I
bet
> you won't, I'm calling pebkac and ID-107 until you've used systemd on a
> pure instal
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> There has been much ado on the arch-general mailing list about the move to
> systemd. I participated in part of it, but like others finally tired of
> "seeing a dead horse kicked" over and over and over. So much so that the
> last dev who real
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <
denisfalqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Felipe Contreras
> >> wrote:
>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:26 PM, phani wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:47:12 +0530, Calvin Morrison <
> mutanttur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's actually more like a business. Often times businesses do polls or
>> statistical information gathering in order to better server their
>> customers.
>>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Øyvind Heggstad
wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:59:24 +0200
> Jérôme Bartand wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Yesterday I read on Phoronix that Arch devs are planning to switch to
> > SystemD, but many users are unhappy with this move. You can see a lot
> > of controver
On Aug 14, 2012 6:52 PM, "Leon Feng" wrote:
>
> 2012/8/15 Thomas Bächler :
> > Am 14.08.2012 18:19, schrieb Brandon Watkins:
> >> Systemd isn't going anywhere anytime soon, its going to be adopted by
RHEL
> >> (which means it would also be adopted by RHEL derivatives like
CentOS), and
> >> its bei
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
> As far as I can tell from the systemd blog and people's reactions
> here, the only advantages systemd offers are:
> - Splitting the configuration files, which increases the robustness of
> the configuration files
> - Daemon supervision
>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Mike wrote:
> On 26/07/12 16:35, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
>> The 26/07/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:57 +0200, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
>>>
>>> By the way ...
>>> ... is there the need to improve something that already works
>>>
>>
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 22.07.2012 22:45, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> > I prefer a well commented rc.conf config file to virtually all of the
> other
> > sysv and variations I've seen. A single file, well laid out and easily
> set up
> > with reasonable
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 07/22/2012 11:35 PM, Nicholas MIller wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:30 PM, v01...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >
> >> Why don't you want to use `pacman -Ss` for a list of available packages?
> >>
&g
an arguement for
what you are searching for.
I usually remove acouple things from base such as Nano and wpa_supplicant (
desktop is hardwired) which with aif was quite simple since it showed you
everything.
> 2012/7/22 Nicholas MIller
>
> > where you could browse the
> &g
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:52:49PM -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>
> > I wonder why everyone thinks that Archlinux is about a single config
> file...
> > It is the same myth as "Arch is faster than distro XYZ" or the "simple
> BSD
> > init".
>
I just looked over the install script wiki page, and was curious if there
was any plan on adding something similiar to AIF where you could browse the
avalible packages, I know for me at least during install I may know what i
need to install but don't think about it until i read it.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 22.07.2012 21:11, schrieb Myra Nelson:
> > On my system rc.conf is 716 B. The three files
> > (hostname 8 B, vconsole.conf 47 B, and locale.conf 30 B) take up less
> > space. Granted at the moment it's more but that will be offset
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> I've followed this discussion closely and, as can be seen in one of
> the posts below, I initially objected to it. I had previously tried
> systemd with little success. Next I carefully re-read all the
> objections, complaints, rants, raves, e
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Nicholas MIller
> wrote:
> > I'm also curious how the people who work on initscript believe systemd is
> > superior.
>
> I think it's a consensus! Ta
I will admit I have yet to try systemd, however the current init/rc.conf
was a major reason for me coming to archlinux. I found the ease of not
having to think about where a lot of configuration files was quite KISS.
I'm also curious how the people who work on initscript believe systemd is
superi
On Jul 10, 2012 9:47 AM, "Arno Gaboury" wrote:
>
> On 07/10/2012 04:42 PM, Kwpolska wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Arno Gaboury
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, gt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
>
> Dear list
>
>
On May 8, 2012 7:27 AM, "Stephen E. Baker"
wrote:
>
> On 08/05/2012 5:14 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> On 08/05/12 18:35, Christian Hesse wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> slim has some known security weaknesses (for example it has no separate
>>> greeter process thus the graphical interface
On Apr 25, 2012 12:57 PM, "Leonid Isaev" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:03:19 +0800
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > in the last months there have been many discussions about init systems,
> > especially systemd. The current state seems to make no one really happy
> > - the curr
sounds better than systemd to me
On Apr 25, 2012 9:03 AM, "Patrick Lauer" wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> in the last months there have been many discussions about init systems,
> especially systemd. The current state seems to make no one really happy
> - the current Arch Linux init system is a bit min
On Apr 4, 2012 5:17 PM, "Nicholas MIller" wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:10:12 -0400
> > Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah run each service as an unprivileged user and you sho
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:10:12 -0400
> Kaiting Chen wrote:
>
> > Yeah run each service as an unprivileged user and you should be fine. If
> > security is very critical than run something like SELinux or a similar
RBAC
> > system.
>
> If you do
On Apr 3, 2012 3:59 PM, "Kaiting Chen" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Nicholas MIller
wrote:
>
> > hello
> >
> > I currently host my personal webpage from a virtual machine at my
house. I
> > am looking to add a mailserver as well as an
hello
I currently host my personal webpage from a virtual machine at my house. I
am looking to add a mailserver as well as an irc server. however I don't
know if I should be using a separate vmachine for each service. I am more
concerned about security than resource use. however the publicly r
hello
I currently host my personal webpage from a virtual machine at my house. I
am looking to add a mailserver as well as an irc server. however I don't
know if I should be using a separate vmachine for each service. I am more
concerned about security than resource use. however the publicly r
Did I miss an announcement?
On Feb 14, 2012 11:06 AM, "Abdul Halim Mat Ali"
wrote:
I don't find download small files is slow especially when the mirror is at
your country.
Furthermore, my country namely Singapore only have one mirror and that one
mirror using FTP.
Arch-devs. Kindly do not delet
remove the # from the startof the line you want to use
On Dec 14, 2011 8:41 AM, "Grant McDuling" wrote:
Hi, I am busy installing Arch core and am stuck at configuring the
locale-gen part of the process. I am asked to uncomment the locales I need.
Does this mean to delete them? There is a
I use yaourt without any problems. Used Clyde prior. And I don't notice
any major differences
On Aug 19, 2011 7:02 PM, "Karol Babioch" wrote:
Hi,
Am 19.08.2011 08:49, schrieb Gour-Gadadhara Dasa:
> Before clyde I used yaourt (which now has C-back end, afaik), tried
paktahn
> (which has some
32 matches
Mail list logo
