Re: [arch-general] BIND, systemd-resolved, and nscd

2018-09-19 Thread Pallissard, Matthew
On 2018-09-19T11:22:16, frede...@ofb.net wrote: > > > Well, prior to the recent BIND releease, the default had been "yes" - > > > which means "no" for me. > > ... > > 2. I'm not sure what you mean by the yes-means-no syntax. The URL that you > > provided seems pretty cut and dry. > > ... > > >

Re: [arch-general] BIND, systemd-resolved, and nscd

2018-09-19 Thread Pallissard, Matthew
On 2018-09-13T12:31:28, frede...@ofb.net wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 06:49:45AM -0700, Pallissard, Matthew wrote: > > > I had to add "dnssec-validation yes;" to /etc/named.conf. I have a > > > > Are you sure you didn't want these values? > > >

Re: [arch-general] BIND, systemd-resolved, and nscd

2018-09-13 Thread Pallissard, Matthew
> I had to add "dnssec-validation yes;" to /etc/named.conf. I have a Are you sure you didn't want these values? dnssec-enable no; dnssec-validation no; Matt Pallissard signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[arch-general] ISC bind 9.11 and dyndb-ldap

2016-10-16 Thread Pallissard, Matthew via arch-general
Has anyone successfully used LDAP as a dynamic back-end for bind 9.11? Unless I'm reading the release notes/new features pages incorrectly the bind-dyndb-ldap plugin has been rolled into ISC's official release and I shouldn't have to mess around with patching/building it from source. Yet I