Hello,
TexLive 2020 is frozen upstream and will be officially released in the
coming days.
Packages have been uploaded to [testing] and [community-testing] (for biber).
Please let me know if you encounter issues with these.
Regards,
Rémy.
Hello,
I will move Texlive 2018 packages to [extra] today, along with zathura
and qpdfview which were rebuilt for libsynctex.
Rémy.
Hello,
TexLive 2017 has been released at the beginning of the month and is
now packaged in [testing].
No particular issue is expected when upgrading to this release.
Note that a few packages disappear in this release, following upstream
changes in structure:
* texlive-genericextra (merged in texl
2016-06-20 0:45 GMT+02:00 Rémy Oudompheng :
> Hello,
>
> I have published new TeXLive packages for the 2016 release in [testing].
> The structure of the packages has been left unchanged (e.g. no introduction
> of pacman hooks).
>
> Feel free to test them and notify me of any
Hello,
I have published new TeXLive packages for the 2016 release in [testing].
The structure of the packages has been left unchanged (e.g. no introduction
of pacman hooks).
Feel free to test them and notify me of any problem or weirdness.
Cheers,
Rémy.
2015-08-24 17:59 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Lokhorst :
> 2015-08-22 21:27 GMT+02:00 Mohammad_AlSaleh :
>>
>> I'm wondering if there is any reason for the hold-up. Other than
>> the maintainers(s) being busy of course.
>>
>
> I'm also curious about this. It seems like the maintainer hasn't been
> active f
Hello,
I have updated TeXLive packages for the 2014 release in the [testing] repo.
The main visible change is the split of the huge texlive-langcjk
package into 3 packages (langchinese, langjapanese, langkorean) to
follow upstream split of the corresponding TeXLive collection.
The upgrade should
Hello,
I am going to push updated TeXLive packages to [extra].
The following bugs are expected to be fixed:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/34932
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28560
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28514
Regards,
Rémy.
Hello,
pyalpm 0.6.2 has been released to [extra].
The following fixes are included:
* pycman: recognize RemoteFileSigLevel and UseDelta=x options (FS#34791)
* init_with_config now handles IgnorePkg and similar options (FS#29688)
Regards,
Rémy.
On 2013/7/3 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have pushed TeXLive 2013 packages to [testing].
>
The packages are now available in [extra].
Please read the news announcement for any issues after the upgrade:
https://www.archlinux.org/news/texlive-2013-update-may-require-user-
Hello,
I have pushed TeXLive 2013 packages to [testing].
The main difference with the 2012 packages is that /etc/texmf files
are now in texlive-core rather than texlive-bin.
The texlive-bin package now contains almost only binaries, and
texlive-core contains all basic data files including the on
Hello,
TeXLive 2012 continuous updates have been frozen for TeXLive 2013 preparation.
I have uploaded updated versions of the TeXLive 2012 packages to
[testing], feel free to report any problems.
Regards,
Rémy.
Hello,
Namcap 3.2.5 is available in [testing].
It features the following changes:
- support "SKIP" in checksums (FS#34647)
- export CARCH correctly to parsepkgbuild (FS#32568)
- recognize .MTREE as package metadata (FS#34591)
Rémy.
The cumulated amount of time spent on these endless discussions has
now almost certainly get past the amount of time necessary to fix
initscripts.
Fix them instead of feeding trolls.
Rémy.
On 2012/8/17 Ben Booth wrote:
> Lots of python scripts still use #!/usr/bin/python instead of explicitly
> stating which version of python to use. Here's quick trick to make running
> various python version 2 or 3 scripts easier:
>
> remove the /usr/bin/python symlink and replace with this shell s
On 2012/8/18 John Briggs wrote:
> IMHO systemd is unnecessarily complex in trying to do too many separate
> tasks.
I don't understand why you are saying that. The systemd project may be
larger than a small utility, but it is composed of:
* multiple, small utilities that do well knwon and well def
On 2012/8/16 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Lennart said systemd will only ever run on Linux and is only designed
> for a full fledged Fedora but is useful on embedded too. However I
> don't think he realised what level the Linux embedded world could
> expand to.
As far as I know, Archlinux does not
On 2012/8/17 Myra Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas MIller wrote:
>> That seems to be one of the more well thought out (not pro), responces to
>> systemd,
>>
>
> Thank you. My intent was to start an intelligent discussion. The rants and
> raves are going no where. I'm not n
On 2012/8/15 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> Am 15.08.2012 11:21, schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
>> > 1./ Be a small simple binary
>>
>> The systemd main binary is not very large (larger than sysvinit's
>> /sbin/init, but not by much).
>>
>
> Just 26 times as large and who knows how many times more complicated.
On 2012/8/15 Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 15.08.2012 13:34, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
> 1./ Be a small simple binary
The systemd main binary is not very large (larger than sysvinit's
/sbin/init, but not by much).
>>>
>>>
On 2012/6/26 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
> not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
> these packages except to fix packaging errors.
> Please try them and complain on ma
On 2012/7/3 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> On 2012/6/26 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
>> not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
>> these packages except to fix pac
On 2012/6/26 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
> not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
> these packages except to fix packaging errors.
> Please try them and complain on ma
On 2012/6/27 Genes MailLists wrote:
> Update:
>
> After installing and getting errors - I re-installed all the texlive
> 2012 packages again - this time there are no errors - and now I can use
> texlive (it was totally broken before the second install).
>
> gene
I would have needed the lo
Hello,
I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
these packages except to fix packaging errors.
Please try them and complain on mailing lists. Don't hesitate to
compile your own theses, memoirs or books.
Le 25 mars 2012 21:33, Hans-J. Schmid a écrit :
> Dear Rémy,
>
> thanks a lot for supporting Archlinux and your brilliant work on maintaining
> all these packages.
>
> I am having a quick question. I am just writing a CV and use the moderncv
> package ( http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex
Le 5 mars 2012 16:40, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:
>> > Apart from that, +1 to this idea. I already checked the list of unneeded
>> > orphans and there's >20 packages I'd like to maintai
On Fri 13 January 2012 at 21:48 -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the release of mkinitcpio 0.8.2, we've added support for mounting
> /usr from early userspace when it exists as a separate partition. This
> has been something people have been asking about for a little while, so
> I fig
On Sun 04 December 2011 at 20:47 +0100, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have done an update of TeXLive to catch up with the distribution
> updates. I think I had a free fix for FS#25250, the packages are in
> [testing] and will move to [extra] quite quickly unless new
Hello,
I have done an update of TeXLive to catch up with the distribution
updates. I think I had a free fix for FS#25250, the packages are in
[testing] and will move to [extra] quite quickly unless new problmes
are reported.
Regards,
Rémy.
On 2011/7/24 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TeXLive 2011 has been officially released. Packages in [testing] have
> been updated to reflect this.
>
Packages have been moved to [extra].
Rémy.
Hello,
netcfg 2.6.8 is released. It is a bug fix release for bugs
FS#25514 [1], FS#25473 [2], FS#25530 [3].
Please sign it off and move it to [core] when possible.
[1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25514
[2] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25473
[3] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25530
Regards,
On 2011/8/1 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
Using that for some days, signof i686.
--
Rémy.
Hello,
I have prepared the netcfg 2.6.6 release. I have let go the previous
signoff thread because of several outstanding issues, which I think are
now resolved.
NEWS except
---
version 2.6.6
- fix wrong rc scripts names in suspend hook (FS#20330)
- fix wireless failure when using wpa-con
On 2011/7/25 Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> On 24 July 2011 20:37, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
>> Hello,
>>>
>> TeXLive 2011 has been officially released. Packages in [testing] have
>> been updated to reflect this.
>
> Hey,
>
> While updating I got some weir
Hello,
TeXLive 2011 has been officially released. Packages in [testing] have
been updated to reflect this.
* biblatex-biber is not packaged and depends and a whole lot of Perl
packages. You can find it on AUR, or some for some developer to
package it and its dependencies
* eptex format generation
Hello,
I have just released netcfg 2.6.4. As I think the amount of outstanding
bugs inside is pretty negligible, I suggest starting a signoff thread
for inclusion into [core].
Then I will start working on including pending new features for 2.7
release.
Highlights of netcfg 2.6.4 are a shining ne
Hello,
I am currently working on another toy example use of pyalpm: beside
pycman, the command line utility that comes with pyalpm, I have now
pacweb, a browsable Web interface to pacman.
http://projects.archlinux.org/users/remy/pacweb.git/
It is not suitable for public consumption, but offers
On 2011/7/5 XeCycle wrote:
> Hello, I am now trying netcfg for managing network connections, however
> I encountered some problems, and I didn't find the solution in the
> manual or the ArchWiki. So I wonder whether a complete documentation is
> available.
There is no complete documentation, and
On 2011/6/20 Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sun 19 Jun 2011 23:23 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
>>
>> netcfg 2.6 has been released and pushed in [testing].
>>
>> - /etc/conf.d/netcfg is a new configuration file, currently only used
>> by net-auto-wireless: it is used to c
On 2011/6/19 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> netcfg 2.6 has been released and pushed in [testing].
Due to a small bug in net-auto-wireless, the version is now 2.6.1.
Additionally some basic configuration of tun/tap interfaces is now
possible.
Rémy.
On Sun 19 June 2011 at 23:23 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Most importantly:
> - netcfg no longer puts no files in /run (dhcpcd still puts files there)
> - netcfg only depends on iproute2 and dhcpcd : wpa_supplicant is
> optional (required for wireless), wpa_actiond, ifplugd are re
Hello,
netcfg 2.6 has been released and pushed in [testing].
The following features has been added since the last release:
- add support for IPv6 configuration (FS#18699)
- add support for static routes configuration (FS#18700)
- add support for creating tun/tap interfaces (FS#15049)
- add config
Hello,
wpa_supplicant is supposed to provide most of the wireless_tools
functionality. I have set up a branch of netcfg that replaces all uses
of wireless_tools by wpa_supplicant.
http://projects.archlinux.org/users/remy/netcfg.git/log/?h=no-iwconfig
iwconfig is still used by the deprecated IWCO
Hello,
I have uploaded a premilinary netcfg package including the latest
changes. It does not correspond to a particular tag in the Git
repository (it's commit 1f5183b8).
http://dev.archlinux.org/~remy/netcfg/netcfg-2.5.90-1-any.pkg.tar.xz
I plan to produce version 2.6 after some polishing has b
On 2011/6/10 James Rayner wrote:
> netcfg has an option that runs ip/iproute with any custom option
> (routes, IPs anything), the option is "IPCFG". It may be seen in the
> example ethernet-iproute[1].
>
> IFCFG is the obscure command you mention, unfortunately it's not too
> obscure, as this was
On 2011/6/11 mwnn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am unable to configure fonts on my new arch linux system. The
> fonts from the old slackware installation are similar to
> http://i.imgur.com/UcwHS.png. The new arch linux fonts look like
> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/695/newemacs.jpg/
Hello,
You d
On 2011/6/9 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> Does netcfg still need net-tools? or can it be an opt depends? It was my
> understanding that it only used ip unless specified otherwise.
Actually, I think it only depends on net-tools because there is some
obscure option that allows users to make it run ifconf
On 2011/6/1 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> TeXLive 2011 is in pre-testing phase.
I have pushed packages to [testing]. Some notes:
* on installation, fmtutil-sys will spew a nerror saying that "eptex"
format was not generated. I guess it means eptex will not work unless
someone finds a fi
TeXLive 2011 is in pre-testing phase. Experimental builds of texlive-bin
will be found in
http://pkgbuild.com/~remy/texlive-experimental/
Current issues are:
- no install script for texlive-bin where it should run "mktexlsr" and
"fmtutil-sys --all"
- dangling symlinks, due to new scripts appea
On 2011/5/23 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> version 2.5.5
> - new connection types: openvpn (FS#21490), vlan
> - new option HIDDEN (for hidden SSIDs)
> - new option SKIPNOCARRIER (FS#21755)
> - default WPA driver is now nl80211
> - minor fixes and improvements (FS#17190, FS#17546,
>
version 2.5.5
- new connection types: openvpn (FS#21490), vlan
- new option HIDDEN (for hidden SSIDs)
- new option SKIPNOCARRIER (FS#21755)
- default WPA driver is now nl80211
- minor fixes and improvements (FS#17190, FS#17546,
FS#20150, FS#20569, FS#21377, FS#23293)
- better zsh completion file (
On 2011/5/8 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> Hello,
> can anyone think of a reason the rc.d scripts are added to kdm, gdm and
> slim? They are not recommended by anyone & they are to be blame for
> occasional weird problems. The standard and IMO only way is to start
> them from inittab.
> They dont com
On 2011/5/7 rafael ff1 wrote:
> HI there!
>
> I'm trying to update PCSX2 with some help of its dev team [1], but it
> is crashing all the time. According to 'gdb' output, it is somehow
> related to lib32-glibc, but it is omitting some information. I was
> hoping to be able to activate more verbosi
Hello,
I have uploaded updated TeXLive packages in [testing]. Apart from regular
package updates from TeXLive, symlinks now belong to their respective
packages (FS #23174, FS#22736).
Since the currently shipped LuaTeX version (0.62) was unstable, as well
as 0.66, the luatex in texlive-bin is now
On 2011/4/5 Bernardo Barros wrote:
> I just look at the list of new Features for Fedora 15.. It will have Gnome 3
> and gcc 4.6 and a bunch of other things. This means that those projects are
> reaching a "stable" phase now? They are currently considered unstable and/or
> in testing on Arch
Hello
Hello,
GHC has been updated to 7.0.2 in the [testing] and [community-testing]
repositories. As with all GHC upgrades, you may have to cleanup globally
registered packages if they did not upgrade properly, as well as your
local Haskell packages.
The usual parts of Haskell Platform (everything exce
On 2011/2/19 David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have run into an issue that is only causing problems on x86_64. It looks
> like libxcb. The kcrash file is here:
>
> [2k]
> http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/dt/trinity/errors/x86_64/kdesktop-1.kcrash
>
> I need to figure out if this is an upstream l
On 2011/2/15 Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again
> for all his hard work.
>
> But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns,
> therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to
> [unsupported] .
>
> Here
HPLIP 3.11.1 was released several days ago : it includes support for
new printers and scanning support for several printers (e.g. the one I
bought last week, HP Deskjet 2050). I thought the package was not very
critical so that I could update it directly in [extra]. I can at least
print and scan (h
Hello,
I became recently interested in Vala, and I did several experiments to
try interfacing it with libalpm. Vala is an object-oriented language
created to be used mainly with glib2/gtk, and writing Vala bindings is
especially lightweight : it is only a matter of writing a "dictionary"
between C
Hello,
I have updated the texlive non-binary packages to track the upstream
updates. You will find the detailed list of updated packages in the
attached file. The update should remain straightforward. I have
cleaned up the install scriptlet, hoping that it still works as
intended. Please notify me
On 2010/12/6 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> This seems to assume that pacman and makepkg run on systems that are
> either 32-bit or 64-bit. IMO, your proposal looks very "ad hoc", and
> would add unnecessary complications to makepkg, with no benefit when
> dealing with P
On 2010/12/6 jesse jaara wrote:
> Currently, if one wants to make a pkg, lets
> say, for an app that only has binaries available
> and only for 32bit archs, then one usually
> makes a bin32-appname pkg for it. I don't
> like this and would like to have the bin32
> and the non-bin32 pkgs to be just
On 2010/11/24 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 2.6.36 series for both arches,
> Latest and greatest moved to testing,
> including most patches from the stable queue of 2.6.36.2.
> In 2.6.36.1-3 the usb issues are fixed.
>
> Please signoff for both arches that we can move everyt
2010/11/23 Tobias Powalowski :
> Latest LTS kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
Everything working as expected here, signoff x86.
Rémy.
Tobias Powalowski :
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> adopted changes from main kernel config:
> - added more cpus for x86_64
> - added tomoyo support
> - disabled rds modules
> - build in rtc into the kernel
> - added pcieaspm option
>
> please signoff for both arches.
signoff i686
--
Rémy.
67 matches
Mail list logo
