It depends on what you put for F in RTFM,same thing in DTFG.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:57 PM, ludovic coues cou...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/3 Raghavendra Prabhu raghu.prabh...@gmail.com
haha...
I think we may soon see RTFM replacing DTFG(Do the F* Googling) or
something
better
Correct me if I am wrong here, but the objective of dbus/ipc is to
vastly simplify programming -- suppose you need to write a program
which opens document in gedit as one of the steps He doesn't need
to know about the command line flags of gedit.By having a single
interface like dbus, it
I never had dbus crashing anytime.. Regarding communication channels - there
are two types in dbus - one is system and other is userland.. So dbus
provided something for userland apps which could not use IPC for some
reason.
Another main reason as pointed above, it is general pub/sub system -
Yeah, XML configuration sucks..(reason for me not using Openbox).
Regarding 'kit' family, it originated from Fedora.. In new Fedora 12, they
have added few more of those kits(like PackageKit)... :)...
One of the reasons these things got added by default maybe that majority of
That mplayer with ascii was a joke :)...not a serious comment.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Piyush P Kurur p...@cse.iitk.ac.in wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:54:10AM +0530, Raghavendra Prabhu wrote:
One thing I don't understand here is - why people crib that package B
should
Thanks again DR. Next time, just send me back the following link:
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/
haha...
I think we may soon see RTFM replacing DTFG(Do the F* Googling) or something
better
Qt 4.6 works fine for me (the one i got from here
https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/packages/x86_64/https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/packages/{i686,x86_64}/
)
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Attila vodoo0...@sonnenkinder.org wrote:
At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 05:03 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
If xorg directly uses udev there is nothing better than that.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:40 PM, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
Anyway hal is dead :
One thing I don't understand here is - why people crib that package B should
not have feature X. If you don't want that, ABS is for that. There are
plenty of packages which have additional dependencies like that mplayer(like
smbclient) or vlc(hal :) or lua).
And secondly, if you have stuff like
I use Opera-10 and it works fine. I don't get any updates stuff(unless I
manually update) and I don't know what popups you are talking about(even
after you can block them for sites).Regarding compatibility, Opera now works
with 99% of the sites. Yes, with some sites it breaks then you can use
Regarding client side rate limiting, I have tried trickle once. Does anyone
know any better rate limiters client side ? Something like dummynet in
FreeBSD. iptables is there but anything simpler would do.
-
Raghavendra
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:47 PM, RedShift redsh...@pandora.be
11 matches
Mail list logo
