Re: [arch-general] Another Major glitch now

2012-01-29 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On Jan 28, 2012 5:07 PM, "P NIKOLIC" wrote: > > Hi Tim . > > Glad i am not the only one , I have a spare drive i am thinking of moving /usr to it see if it will work like that .. > > Pete . Moving /usr to a separate partition is not recommended: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-

Re: [arch-general] Top Posting Revisited

2011-12-16 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On 12/16/2011 04:59, C Anthony Risinger wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote: On 12/16/2011 02:03, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. wrote: I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they should top or bottom post. A majority of mail client

Re: [arch-general] Top Posting Revisited

2011-12-15 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On 12/16/2011 02:03, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. wrote: I don't really think that people put any conscious thought into if they should top or bottom post. A majority of mail clients and the aforementioned Gmail default to top posting. What I would like to know is why is this the common practice. Obvio

Re: [arch-general] Accented characters in X terminal?

2011-12-14 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On 12/14/2011 10:48, Magnus Therning wrote: I just noticed that I no longer get accented characters in my terminals (I've tested lxterminal and gnome-terminal so far). Instead of the Swedish characters "åäö" I get "???". Far from ideal. This used to work a while ago (we're talking days, possib

Re: [arch-general] pacman new generation

2011-11-22 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On 11/22/2011 13:36, Taylor Hedberg wrote: Nicolas Sebrecht, Tue 2011-11-22 @ 16:24:02+0100: I don't think, so. IMHO, the pool of contributors is bigger with a high-level language than for C, simply because the learning curve of a good high-level language is much shorter. You can't seriously be

Re: [arch-general] xdm, who and X sessions

2011-10-11 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On 10/11/2011 11:42 AM, Norbert Zeh wrote: Hi folks, wanting to go lightweight, I just switched back from kdm to xdm, but I ran into a little snag, which I reported as bug FS#26395 on the bug tracker. I'm no longer sure this is actually a bug, at least not of "who". Why not use 'slim' instea

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD for extra/cegui

2010-01-11 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:40:46AM -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense > wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I've posted on forum (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=88509) > > that the package extra/cegui was

[arch-general] PKGBUILD for extra/cegui

2010-01-10 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
Hi all! I've posted on forum (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=88509) that the package extra/cegui was out of date and then was instructed by Allan to post the modified PKGBUILD on the mailing list. Basically, I just modified the version, the license file location and md5sums. Also, a st