On 4/8/08, David Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bächler wrote:
[snip]
Simple as in a technical standpoint, says that it should be mounted in
fstab. Why? Because fstab is the place were filesystems that should be
mounted on boot go.
I believe the missing question is: what is the rationale beyond this
decision of putting the /dev/pts out of fstab? Besides the aforementioned
robustness (which at some point I tend to agree), what else would be the
technically benefits? If for nothing else than stopping the user to shoot
his
On 4/7/08, Alessio Bolognino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas, if you are afraid that users could remove that line from fstab,
why
don't you just put a # Warning, do not remove these lines unless you
really
know what you are doing or something like that? I think this will reduce
complexity
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:09 PM, bardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Dwight Schauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course German is more useful than Ruby! Phffftt... Who could
possibly not think that?
Just consider the number of German users versus Ruby users
On Feb 7, 2008 9:15 AM, DaNiMoTh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/6, Roman Kyrylych [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[cut]
Also, GtkPacman development is started again.
Uhu, we have also paKman ( or YAPG ), a KDE frontend, that is actually
abandoned. If anyone is interested on development, this is the
On Jan 20, 2008 8:51 AM, Mark Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Jan 2008 20:09, JJDaNiMoTh wrote:
http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3174
KDE 4.0 != KDE4 ... and devs of arch know it :)
This comment sums up the posting, which seems to be a bit
of magnet for those who want to point
6 matches
Mail list logo
