Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

g to new crap. > > You don't consider that I'm not against new software and new versions, > but I'm against crap. FULL ACK, Thank you :) Tino Reichardt Using Arch since the Widget Release!

Re: [arch-general] My end-user $0.02 on /etc/rc.conf splitting.

* Menachem Moystoviz wrote: > As far as I can tell from the systemd blog and people's reactions > here, the only advantages systemd offers are: > - Splitting the configuration files, which increases the robustness of > the configuration files > - Daemon supervision > - Bootup speedup by paralleliz

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-5

ackers have a working vanilla kernel again... ? -- regards, Tino Reichardt

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.2-1

* Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Latest kernel is in testing since weekend, > please signoff for both arches. > > greetings > tpowa signoff x86_64 -- regards, TR

[arch-general] midnight commander 4.7.0 released

Hello list, since the Changelog of mc 4.7.0 mentioned "pacman's PKGBUILD" files we should give the new version a try ;) changelog: http://www.midnight-commander.org/wiki/NEWS-4.7.0 download: http://www.midnight-commander.org/downloads Of cause, full utf8 support comes now out of the box... I di

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Snort UID / GID

* Hugo Doria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem of using the user "nobody" is that if it is used for > various services, and one of these is compromised it can also affect > snort. > > IMHO, we have two options: > > 1) Create a "snort" user/group and provide a package with fewer > privilege

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

* Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Montag, 5. Mai 2008 08:12 Tino Reichardt wrote: > > > Admin of an important server != admin of some private notebook ;) > > I want only to show that at the end everybody is an admin but okay i stop > joking.-) Okay, I am sor

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

* Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sonntag, 4. Mai 2008 22:28 Tino Reichardt wrote: > > > It isn't to hard. Its just the plain truth. > > > > If the maintainer hasn't the time, he should give the package to someone > > else, which has t

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

* Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sonntag, 4. Mai 2008 12:47 Tino Reichardt wrote: > > > If they don't have the time to be a maintainer for some package, they > > shouldn't be the maintainer of it! > > For me this is definitely too hard. And unfa

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

* Alessio Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun 2008-05-04 12:47 , Tino Reichardt wrote: > > * pyther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > * Tino Reichardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hello list, > > > >> >

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

* pyther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Tino Reichardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello list, > >> > >> clamav should be updated. > > > > Why does the update of clamav take so long ? > > > > Should I build a new package ?

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

* Tino Reichardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello list, > > clamav should be updated. Why does the update of clamav take so long ? Should I build a new package ? -- regards, TR

[arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93

Hello list, clamav should be updated. -- regards, TR pgplsBCMitnUu.pgp Description: PGP signature