Re: [arch-general] Revisiting the SELinux/audit question: Disabling audit on the kernel command line

2017-02-13 Thread Tobias Markus
Hi, On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 20:53 +0100, SET wrote: > Le dimanche 12 février 2017 18:43:22 CET Tobias Markus a écrit : > > I would be glad if Arch Linux's official kernel could support SELinux > > again this way! > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2

Re: [arch-general] Revisiting the SELinux/audit question: Disabling audit on the kernel command line

2017-02-13 Thread Tobias Markus
On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 23:13 +0100, Nicolas Iooss wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Tobias Markus <tob...@miglix.eu> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As some of you might know, the question of enabling SELinux support in > > the official Arch Linux kernel

Re: [arch-general] Revisiting the SELinux/audit question: Disabling audit on the kernel command line

2017-02-13 Thread Tobias Markus
On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 14:02 -0700, Leonid Isaev wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 06:43:22PM +0100, Tobias Markus wrote: > > I would be glad if Arch Linux's official kernel could support SELinux > > again this way! > > AFAIR, coreutils and many other things need to be rebui

[arch-general] Revisiting the SELinux/audit question: Disabling audit on the kernel command line

2017-02-12 Thread Tobias Markus
Hi, As some of you might know, the question of enabling SELinux support in the official Arch Linux kernel package has been brought up a number of times. The main issue that has been pointed out the previous time was that enabling SELinux depends on CONFIG_AUDIT which is considered unnecessary or

[arch-general] [extra] festival packge (Orphan)

2015-07-28 Thread Tobias Markus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I hope this is the right place to post. The festival package (in [extra]) has been an orphan and out-of-date for a while, 2.1 is packaged, 2.4 is available. I fixed some of the errors coming up when trying to build festival 2.4 in the