me. Thanks for confirming though, I was hoping
I wasn't missing an important feature of makepkg.
Travis
>
dependency for yaourt.
-s/--syncdeps automatically resolves and install any dependencies with
pacman before building. If the package depends on other AUR packages, you
will need to manually install them first.[1]
Travis
[1]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Build_and_install_the_package
>
understood the process and was comfortable with it.
Travis
>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:12 AM Maykel Franco via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> How can block in apache? The traffic enter anyway...what I want is
> that the requests do not enter? the apache does not process?
>
>From your description, it sounds like you want to block incomin
necessarily mean
Firefox gained root privileges. Try it on any other running user
process, and you'll probably get the same behavior.
I believe there's a knob (/proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope) that
controls this restriction.
--
Travis Evans
if you try to register
https://bbs.archlinux.org/register.php
it has a anti-spam question.
that fails
on both cent and arch
cent:
[x@x /]$ date -u +%V$(uname)|sha256sum|sed 's/\W//g
> ^C
[x@x /]$
arch:
[root@alarmpi ~]# echo date -u +%V$(uname)|sha256sum|sed 's/\W//g
>
[root@alarmpi ~]# date -u +
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Diamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there something wrong with the Arch website? I was unable to log in so I
>> requested a password. I am unable to log in with the password tha
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Colin Pitrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will be out of the office starting 01/08/2008 and will not return until
> 11/08/2008.
>
> I will respond to your message when I return.
Oh no! If you're out of the office, whoever will handle our
office-based issues? You
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a user
> has packages in group base-devel installed.
Ideally, the user should have BOTH base and base-devel installed for
package building.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not clear, at least not to me:
>
>- undecided whether to keep the package specific configs in /etc/srcpac.d
> or in /var/srcpac
Of the two, I'd suggest /etc/srcpac.d - it's essentially configuration data.
>-
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Nigel Henry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my Fedora installs there is a GUI for stopping and starting services, and
> also the option of using chkconfig on the CLI. On my Debian installs, I
> installed sysv-rc-conf, which runs on the CLI, and allows you to stop a
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I just realized that, for some squirrely reason, I am currently
> > "maintaining" libcap. I have no freakin' clue what
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> test
I don't think it got through. You probably have to say "testing 1, 2,
3" before it works.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i read the informations about the new abs and the step behind to svn again
> but
> i'm too silly to find where i can look for the changes of a package as before
> under cvs.archlinux.org.
>
> Can someone post the new
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
l to get it?
> >
> > after abs
> >
> > shakti:~$ ls /var/abs
> > core extra local README testing unstable
> > shakti:~$ grep REPOS /etc/abs.conf
> > # REPOS to be parsed by abs (in this order)
> > REPOS=(core extra unstable community tes
This thread has gotten ridiculous.
Thread locked.
owait...
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:01 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > 2008/3/6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Whomever recently (in the last hour or so) edited the wiki page for
> >> Wireless_Setup messed up the characters. I am only getting "square
> >> blocks" now in many places.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Xavi Soler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 22 February 2008 19:36:38 Travis Willard wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavi Soler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > My intention is to know the number
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavi Soler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My intention is to know the number of non-free packages installed on my
> system. In Debian I can use 'vrms' [1]. I think Arch has nothing similar, but
> I can start programming an application like 'vrms' (maybe using libal
On Feb 19, 2008 10:21 AM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -S,
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Simo Leone wrote:
>
> > I will be updating the AUR on main site sometime this evening. There
> > might be intermittent downtime and maintenance messages, but downtime
> > will be minimal.
>
> The new
On Feb 8, 2008 6:06 PM, marc[î1] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Arch devs put man pages in /usr/share/man like FHS want, ok.
>
> But FHS says :
> « Manual pages for X11R6 are stored in /usr/X11R6/man. It follows that all
> manual page hierarchies in the system must have the same structure
On Feb 8, 2008 3:06 PM, Sentinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It works perfectly (at least for me), just you have to ensure, that you
> call it with appropriate rights while testing:
> my testing:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> Password:
> with power comes great responsibility
> [EMAIL PROTECT
On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've cleaned up testing a bit:
> > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/fi
On Feb 6, 2008 5:32 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, J
On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've cleaned up testing a bit:
> > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part
> > of the /usr move
>
> Any idea why a
On Jan 29, 2008 11:22 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:55:26AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> > Jason,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
> >
> >> Being the guy who wrote namcap, I'm pretty sure it doesn't do this at all.
> >>
> >> Can I get a copy of
On Jan 28, 2008 1:26 PM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > That's odd - it looks like it ought to depend on ncurses (and
> > openssl?) at the very least. You can run pacman -Qo on those files to
> > se
On Jan 28, 2008 12:03 PM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Build the package, then run namcap
> > /path/to/pkgname-pkgver-pkgrel.pkg.tar.gz and it'll tell you. If you
> > can't even build the
On Jan 28, 2008 11:46 AM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found a few mentions of namcap on the wiki. I tried it on the package I
> created, which I don't currently have any dependencies listed in, and the
> only problems it reports are missing maintainer and CVS id tags. It
> menti
On Jan 9, 2008 11:37 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 3:50 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it possible to make the box for comment, in the flag package
> > out-of-date, a
> > little bit bigger? As it is now, it is hard to see what you write
On Dec 22, 2007 6:52 AM, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first one is finding all the packages that directly depend on a
> specific package, even if they're not installed. This came to my mind
> considering those upgrades which break other software, like x264 and
> tcl/tk (8.5 has just been
On Dec 19, 2007 1:09 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi.
> > when i go to http://ftp.archlinux.org/, i got a site like the one showing up
> > at http://www.response-o-matic.com/
> >
> > should it be the ftp site
On Dec 17, 2007 4:22 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SUGGESTION 1:
> Have a central repository for all the source files needed by archlinux, and
> modify makepkg so that when the source cannot be found on the original place,
> it is gotten from this backup repository. That way m
On Dec 16, 2007 11:48 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> söndag 16 december 2007 skrev Mister Dobalina:
>
> > The point is that the developers don't want to get a
> > bunch of bug reports for things that might be
> > i586-specific problems. They are saying "we've tested
> > the pac
Just a hint, since you were looking to add i586 - find and sed are
your friends. :D
find -name PKGBUILD -exec sed -i '/^arch=/ { /i586/ !{
s/^arch=(/arch=(i586 / } }' {} \;
That will find every PKGBUILD and add i586 to the packages that don't
already have it. Yay!
On Nov 30, 2007 11:47 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't rocket surgery.
We need an engine transplant, STAT!
On Nov 30, 2007 8:20 AM, Vinay Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > It will look more elegant that way.
> > Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
> > :-)
>
> And
38 matches
Mail list logo
