On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Diamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there something wrong with the Arch website? I was unable to log in so I
>> requested a password. I am unable to log in with the password tha
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Colin Pitrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will be out of the office starting 01/08/2008 and will not return until
> 11/08/2008.
>
> I will respond to your message when I return.
Oh no! If you're out of the office, whoever will handle our
office-based issues? You
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a user
> has packages in group base-devel installed.
Ideally, the user should have BOTH base and base-devel installed for
package building.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not clear, at least not to me:
>
>- undecided whether to keep the package specific configs in /etc/srcpac.d
> or in /var/srcpac
Of the two, I'd suggest /etc/srcpac.d - it's essentially configuration data.
>-
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Nigel Henry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my Fedora installs there is a GUI for stopping and starting services, and
> also the option of using chkconfig on the CLI. On my Debian installs, I
> installed sysv-rc-conf, which runs on the CLI, and allows you to stop a
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I just realized that, for some squirrely reason, I am currently
> > "maintaining" libcap. I have no freakin' clue what
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> test
I don't think it got through. You probably have to say "testing 1, 2,
3" before it works.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i read the informations about the new abs and the step behind to svn again
> but
> i'm too silly to find where i can look for the changes of a package as before
> under cvs.archlinux.org.
>
> Can someone post the new
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With the new abs, community disappeared from /var/abs.
> > Do I need to do something special to get it?
> >
> > after abs
> >
>
This thread has gotten ridiculous.
Thread locked.
owait...
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:01 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > 2008/3/6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Whomever recently (in the last hour or so) edited the wiki page for
> >> Wireless_Setup messed up the characters. I am only getting "square
> >> blocks" now in many places.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Xavi Soler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 22 February 2008 19:36:38 Travis Willard wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavi Soler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > My intention is to know the number
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavi Soler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My intention is to know the number of non-free packages installed on my
> system. In Debian I can use 'vrms' [1]. I think Arch has nothing similar, but
> I can start programming an application like 'vrms' (maybe using libal
On Feb 19, 2008 10:21 AM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -S,
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Simo Leone wrote:
>
> > I will be updating the AUR on main site sometime this evening. There
> > might be intermittent downtime and maintenance messages, but downtime
> > will be minimal.
>
> The new
On Feb 8, 2008 6:06 PM, marc[î1] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Arch devs put man pages in /usr/share/man like FHS want, ok.
>
> But FHS says :
> « Manual pages for X11R6 are stored in /usr/X11R6/man. It follows that all
> manual page hierarchies in the system must have the same structure
On Feb 8, 2008 3:06 PM, Sentinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It works perfectly (at least for me), just you have to ensure, that you
> call it with appropriate rights while testing:
> my testing:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> Password:
> with power comes great responsibility
> [EMAIL PROTECT
On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've cleaned up testing a bit:
> > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/fi
On Feb 6, 2008 5:32 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, J
On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've cleaned up testing a bit:
> > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part
> > of the /usr move
>
> Any idea why a
On Jan 29, 2008 11:22 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:55:26AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> > Jason,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
> >
> >> Being the guy who wrote namcap, I'm pretty sure it doesn't do this at all.
> >>
> >> Can I get a copy of
On Jan 28, 2008 1:26 PM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > That's odd - it looks like it ought to depend on ncurses (and
> > openssl?) at the very least. You can run pacman -Qo on those files to
> > se
On Jan 28, 2008 12:03 PM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Build the package, then run namcap
> > /path/to/pkgname-pkgver-pkgrel.pkg.tar.gz and it'll tell you. If you
> > can't even build the
On Jan 28, 2008 11:46 AM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found a few mentions of namcap on the wiki. I tried it on the package I
> created, which I don't currently have any dependencies listed in, and the
> only problems it reports are missing maintainer and CVS id tags. It
> menti
On Jan 9, 2008 11:37 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 3:50 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it possible to make the box for comment, in the flag package
> > out-of-date, a
> > little bit bigger? As it is now, it is hard to see what you write
On Dec 22, 2007 6:52 AM, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first one is finding all the packages that directly depend on a
> specific package, even if they're not installed. This came to my mind
> considering those upgrades which break other software, like x264 and
> tcl/tk (8.5 has just been
On Dec 19, 2007 1:09 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi.
> > when i go to http://ftp.archlinux.org/, i got a site like the one showing up
> > at http://www.response-o-matic.com/
> >
> > should it be the ftp site
On Dec 17, 2007 4:22 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SUGGESTION 1:
> Have a central repository for all the source files needed by archlinux, and
> modify makepkg so that when the source cannot be found on the original place,
> it is gotten from this backup repository. That way m
On Dec 16, 2007 11:48 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> söndag 16 december 2007 skrev Mister Dobalina:
>
> > The point is that the developers don't want to get a
> > bunch of bug reports for things that might be
> > i586-specific problems. They are saying "we've tested
> > the pac
Just a hint, since you were looking to add i586 - find and sed are
your friends. :D
find -name PKGBUILD -exec sed -i '/^arch=/ { /i586/ !{
s/^arch=(/arch=(i586 / } }' {} \;
That will find every PKGBUILD and add i586 to the packages that don't
already have it. Yay!
On Nov 30, 2007 11:47 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't rocket surgery.
We need an engine transplant, STAT!
On Nov 30, 2007 8:20 AM, Vinay Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > It will look more elegant that way.
> > Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
> > :-)
>
> And
32 matches
Mail list logo
