Re: [arch-general] Mkvtoolnix-gui/cli

2015-10-05 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On 10/05/2015 09:03 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: This will be fixed sometimes during the week, I currently have no internet connection except at work. I will push updated packages as soon as I have working internet at home. I've tried compiling it from source. I've compiled it, but no GUI support

Re: [arch-general] Mkvtoolnix-gui/cli

2015-10-04 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
Thanks, I understand now, I'll look into it! On Oct 4, 2015 10:13 AM, "Moritz Bunkus" wrote: > Hey, > > > After the latest "pacman -Syu" I'm having a weird issue, I've upgraded > > the mkvtoolnix package, and I seem to have lost the "mmg" program. > > mmg (the old GUI) has been superseded by the

[arch-general] Mkvtoolnix-gui/cli

2015-10-04 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
Hi. After the latest "pacman -Syu" I'm having a weird issue, I've upgraded the mkvtoolnix package, and I seem to have lost the "mmg" program. This was a gui for mkvmerge basically but with a nice featureset and I was using it heavily for editing home videos I'm making with my smartphone and other

Re: [arch-general] Subpixel antialiasing

2015-05-24 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
alias: true Xft.rgba: rgb Xft.hinting:true Xft.hintstyle: hintslight On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Troy Engel wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Vladimir Nikšić > wrote: > > > > I'm using xfce4. The settings > appearance had subpixel disabled, but &g

[arch-general] Subpixel antialiasing

2015-05-24 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
Hi guys! I've done a pacman -Syu this morning. The upgrade went fine, all the key components are working properly, except a slight issue I'm having with chromium. Chromium no longer obeys the subpixel antialiasing, but instead has a basic AA mode, without the subpixel hinting. This of course resul

Re: [arch-general] Little automation to install

2015-04-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On 04/01/2015 06:53 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote: Hello all, After some many years, I'm back to ArchLinux. One thing that took me time was to read the manuals and run all the commands for installation. That made me wonder on how automation might help things get easier and faster on install. Cou

Re: [arch-general] New version of "top"?

2014-11-21 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On 11/19/2014 01:54 PM, Michael Alt wrote: look here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1474872#p1474872 Wow, exactly what I needed, thanks! It's incredible how they have the audacity to change such a basic tool to something else. And I really dislike that now everything has to be

[arch-general] New version of "top"?

2014-11-19 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
I noticed that after a last "$pacman -Syu" that I got a pretty different version of the utility top in the package procps-ng. What exactly happened, how can I get the old-style one back? Thanks. :)

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 04.01.2012 11:51, schrieb Manne Merak: >> Also, these are the other Nvidia options that I have tweaked over the >> years. Not sure how many are still valid. >> >> Section "Device" >> ... >> Option "RenderAccel" "True" >> Option "TripleBuf

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
> That is strange.  I have KDE4 will effects (wife likes them ;) and it works > fine. > Long shot, but try adding: [...] Long shot... and miss. :)

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Manne Merak wrote: > I have same flashplugin installed, same CPU, with Nvidia, high res 1920x1200 > and fullscreen works fine. There are some oddities with this flash version. For example... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKv7lyIJts0 This video plays terribly in fu

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
> You could use stuff like minitube for youtube or youtube-dl I know of minitube, but that's not a replacement for in-browser youtube, clicking links, multiple tabs, etc...

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
> Have you tried switching the hardware acceleration on or off either through > the interface or the /etc/adobe/mms.cfg file ? Tried all combinations, no luck. > For YouTube, you should switch to HTML5 [1]. Yes, I'm well aware of the HTML5 youtube. It's still not up to speed, as far as stability

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
> Do you have "EnableLinuxHWVideoDecode=1" uncommented > in /etc/adobe/mms.cfg? I had to comment mine out else I get results > much like yours. It was already set to 0. Just as a precaution, I commented it out, but as expected, no changes.

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 03.01.2012 13:58, schrieb Vladimir Nikšić: >> A couple of months ago I switched from >> Ubuntu where youtube was working essentially flawlessly, fullscreen or not. > > "A couple of months ago", there was

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
> Try flashplugin-beta from AUR. It works for me much better than flashplugin > from > extra repository. Just tried it. The same thing as from the extra or just libflashplayer.so placed in the appropriate plugin file. :/

[arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-03 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
I have an ongoing problem with flash performance. I tried installing flashplugin-11.1.102.55-1 from the pacman repositories. The videos on youtube for example, works fine as long as I don't turn on fullscreen. The video gets really choppy and the CPU usage spikes to 100% (one core). I have a Co

Re: [arch-general] Question regarding the default file manager in XFCE

2011-12-20 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On 12/19/2011 11:54 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: I took an alternate approach. On Windows, the Windows+E key combination on the keyboard brings up the Windows Explorer file manager, and is a key combo that I got used to when working on Windows. So under XFCE, I just set up a similar key combo to

Re: [arch-general] Question regarding the default file manager in XFCE

2011-12-20 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On 12/20/2011 03:40 PM, gt wrote: sudo mv /usr/bin/xfdesktop /usr/bin/xfdesktop-off sudo ln -s /usr/bin/nautilus /usr/bin/xfdesktop more here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1167149 But, i don't know if symlinking is such a good idea. Moreover there'll be no desktop icons. Nah, tha

Re: [arch-general] Question regarding the default file manager in XFCE

2011-12-20 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
> I think this is handled by the same XDG 'mimeapps.list' which contains > file type associations. Just add an entry for "inode/directory" pointing > to Nautilus: > >    ~/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list > >    [Default Applications] >    inode/directory=nautilus.desktop Tried that, didn't

[arch-general] Question regarding the default file manager in XFCE

2011-12-19 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
I'm using xfce wm. I rarely even use a file manager, I do things through the console almost all the time, but sometimes I need a file manager, makes some things easier. Thunar as a file manager is OK, but nautilus is a lot more powerful, has decent tab implementation etc, etc, doesn't really m