ar...@de-vri.es>> wrote:
On 28-12-2020 10:42, Peter K Haokip via arch-general wrote:
> I read an forum entry from nearly 6 years ago about am
efibootmgr bug that
> Doesn't let you change the boot order on a multi OS system if
you have arch
> linux as the default O
2020, 15:45 Maarten de Vries, wrote:
> On 28-12-2020 10:42, Peter K Haokip via arch-general wrote:
> > I read an forum entry from nearly 6 years ago about am efibootmgr bug
> that
> > Doesn't let you change the boot order on a multi OS system if you have
> arch
> > li
On 28-12-2020 10:42, Peter K Haokip via arch-general wrote:
I read an forum entry from nearly 6 years ago about am efibootmgr bug that
Doesn't let you change the boot order on a multi OS system if you have arch
linux as the default OS. Had some users report this as well in other
forums.
Now i
I read an forum entry from nearly 6 years ago about am efibootmgr bug that
Doesn't let you change the boot order on a multi OS system if you have arch
linux as the default OS. Had some users report this as well in other
forums.
Now i am facing the that problem in my system with arch ubuntu
Em dezembro 22, 2020 13:33 Emil Velikov escreveu:
Is there any interest in the bugs opened, or the gvt regression is a
must for those to move forward?
My systems lack gvt support (nor do I have Windows license) to
reproduce the bug(s), yet I'm willing to help to get this moving.
Yes. I
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 11:43, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 18:47, Giancarlo Razzolini
> wrote:
> >
> > Em dezembro 7, 2020 14:24 Emil Velikov escreveu:
> > >
> > > Doing GL (primus+bumblebee) as a start, trimmed only to the bare
> > > minimum changes:
> > >
It’s a bug in libyuv-r2212+dfaf7534-1, fixed in libyuv-r2212+dfaf7534-2.
Regards,
Archange
Le 22 décembre 2020 16:38:25 GMT+01:00, Genes Lists via arch-general
a écrit :
>Todays update[1] of darktable along with libavif / libavif led to this
>message:
>
>(5/7) Probing GDK-P
On 12/22/20 10:55 AM, Juergen Werner via arch-general wrote:
...
Try libyuv-r2212+dfaf7534-2. Looks like that might fix your problem.
Yes indeed I just got it - thanks - and all looks fine now.
gene
On 22.12.2020 16:38, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
Todays update[1] of darktable along with libavif / libavif led to this
message:
(5/7) Probing GDK-Pixbuf loader modules...
g_module_open() failed for
/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-avif.so:
/usr/lib/libyuv.so
Todays update[1] of darktable along with libavif / libavif led to this
message:
(5/7) Probing GDK-Pixbuf loader modules...
g_module_open() failed for
/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-avif.so:
/usr/lib/libyuv.so: undefined symbol: jpeg_read_raw_data
I have libjpeg-turbo
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 05:33:05PM +0100, Erich Eckner via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
Yo!
> I was surprised to find git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/ and
> git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/ being no longer updated since a
> few days. I know, there was a g
some deprecation notice for the old locations
or is this some oversight on the arch end?
regards,
Erich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE3p92iMrPBP64GmxZCu7JB1Xae1oFAl/ffMIACgkQCu7JB1Xa
e1qskg//T0HkTdj33ygNCpDNwvDf2H6V1zOBkjadlHrXph4/WkQIyYa7QJxmWXfV
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 00:12, Maarten de Vries wrote:
>
> On 16-12-2020 14:09, Tasnad Kernetzky via arch-general wrote:
> > Hi All,
> Hi,
> >
> > I suppose I hit this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68963 and it
> > seems it is not fully resolved. I
On 16-12-2020 14:09, Tasnad Kernetzky via arch-general wrote:
Hi All,
Hi,
I suppose I hit this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68963 and it
seems it is not fully resolved. I didn't request to reopen the bug,
because I'm not 100% sure it is really the same thing.
The bug you're
Hi All,
I suppose I hit this bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68963 and it
seems it is not fully resolved. I didn't request to reopen the bug,
because I'm not 100% sure it is really the same thing.
I have a setup with kerberos/sssd/pam/autofs, authenticating with an
active directory,
Hello,
I tried to install alice-vision-git together with meshroom, but it seems
sth. isn't found:
Meshroom-2020.1.1]$ Meshroom
WARNING:root:== The following "submitters" plugins could not be loaded ==
* simpleFarmSubmitter: No module named 'simpleFarm'
Traceback (most recent call last):
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 18:47, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
>
> Em dezembro 7, 2020 14:24 Emil Velikov escreveu:
> >
> > Doing GL (primus+bumblebee) as a start, trimmed only to the bare
> > minimum changes:
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68882
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68883
> >
>
>
Hi, I'm using PulseAudio over JACK and noticed in htop that while not
doing nothing PA works much more than when idle alone, is this
normal/right?
This is what I do:
Close everything that uses audio. Start JACK through qjackctl.
$ pulseaudio --kill
$ pulseaudio --start
(So, PA now works as some
Em dezembro 7, 2020 14:24 Emil Velikov escreveu:
Doing GL (primus+bumblebee) as a start, trimmed only to the bare
minimum changes:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68882
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68883
Thanks.
Do you have details or a bug report about these? I haven't used intel
gvt-g
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 14:11, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
>
> Em dezembro 4, 2020 10:04 Emil Velikov escreveu:
> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 12:50, Giancarlo Razzolini
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Em dezembro 4, 2020 9:27 Emil Velikov via arch-general escreveu:
> &
Em dezembro 4, 2020 10:04 Emil Velikov escreveu:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 12:50, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
Em dezembro 4, 2020 9:27 Emil Velikov via arch-general escreveu:
> I would love to hear the input from the respective maintainers and the
> overall Arch developer base as a
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 12:55, Lone_Wolf wrote:
>
>
> On 04-12-2020 13:50, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
> > Em dezembro 4, 2020 9:27 Emil Velikov via arch-general escreveu:
> >> I would love to hear the input from the respective maintainers and the
> >
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 12:50, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
>
> Em dezembro 4, 2020 9:27 Emil Velikov via arch-general escreveu:
> > I would love to hear the input from the respective maintainers and the
> > overall Arch developer base as a whole.
> >
>
> As the
Em dezembro 4, 2020 9:27 Emil Velikov via arch-general escreveu:
I would love to hear the input from the respective maintainers and the
overall Arch developer base as a whole.
As the maintainer for both bumblebee and prime-run, I don't see the need for
deprecation, yet.
Bumblebee still has
Hello all,
As some of you may know, I have been an Arch user for over 5 years and a
Linux graphics developer working on the whole stack from the kernel DRM
all the way up-to Mesa and X.
I would like to propose, partially deprecating and potentially removing
some of the said packages in light
Hi,
Le 03/12/2020 à 22:58, Jörg Jellissen a écrit :
Hello,
i am currently searching for another software solution for a SIP
Softphone on Gnome in ArchLinux.
I didn't found a good solution.
In AUR there is linphone available but i think this is terrible for me.
Have you tried Jami? It used
02.12.2020 00:31, mpan пишет:
hello. GnuPG 2.2.25 has been released it fixes bug which affects me.
but arch only has Version 2.2.24-1 in testing. my question is why it
haven't been updated? if the maintainer simply does not have time
yet, then I understand, but maybe there is another reason
Le mardi 1 décembre 2020 15:57:53 CET Alexander Epaneshnikov via arch-general
a écrit :
> hello. GnuPG 2.2.25 has been released it fixes bug which affects me. but
> arch only has Version 2.2.24-1 in testing. my question is why it haven't
> been updated? if the maintainer simply does not
01.12.2020 18:22, karx via arch-general пишет:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 8:58 AM Alexander Epaneshnikov via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
hello. GnuPG 2.2.25 has been released it fixes bug which affects me. but
arch only has Version 2.2.24-1 in testing. my question
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 8:58 AM Alexander Epaneshnikov via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> hello. GnuPG 2.2.25 has been released it fixes bug which affects me. but
> arch only has Version 2.2.24-1 in testing. my question is why it haven't
> been updated? if the ma
hello. GnuPG 2.2.25 has been released it fixes bug which affects me. but
arch only has Version 2.2.24-1 in testing. my question is why it haven't
been updated? if the maintainer simply does not have time yet, then I
understand, but maybe there is another reason?
--
Sincerely, Alexander.
Hi,
you didn't provide the information how you tried to enable the
translations. Could the following be the culprit?
"If you are using a desktop environment, such as GNOME, its language
settings may be overriding the settings in locale.conf." -
Thank you all. I can now choose this board definitely.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 3:09 PM SET via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I 'm planning to buy a PC with an MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI mother
> board, having a Realtek RTL8111H ethernet device, and install Arch of
> course.
>
> I 'v
Hello,
I 'm planning to buy a PC with an MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI mother board,
having a Realtek RTL8111H ethernet device, and install Arch of course.
I 've seen many web pages about the need to install the r8168 package for it to
work. Some pages hint that the r8169 driver should work
Yeah, this sounds more like a mirror problem than a database problem.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, 9:16 AM LuKaRo wrote:
> On 27.11.20 15:37, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > Failed to synchronize all error failed to update each database and
> > finally error failed to synchronize all data bases.
> Are you
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:37:53 -0500
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Failed to synchronize all error failed to update each database and
> finally error failed to synchronize all data bases.
>
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, Nate DeMare via arch-general wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09
"The pacman data bases I have apparently got broken and will not update."
What specifically does the pacman error say?
Hi,
>
> Should I file a bug, email the maintainer of the package, email the
> latest package uploader, etc.? What's the quickest way to get this
> resolved?
>
Writing an mail to arch-general is much more better than using the bug
tracker. Bug trackers, what are they used for?
Regards
Bjoern
Hi, Evangelos
in the source tree of 'gn' package, the emacs mode scripts has been
added in misc/emacs/gn-mode.el
Could you please add that mode into the gn release package in ArchLinux ?
Many of use have been there! Earlier this year I overwrote /etc/shadow with
pacnew in a moment of madness.
d somewhere that I could tell pam to use debug output. I will
see if I can find that.
Thanks for the tip.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:15 AM Guus Snijders via arch-general
wrote:
>
> Op za 14 nov. 2020 03:50 schreef Jack Frost via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org>
Op za 14 nov. 2020 03:50 schreef Jack Frost via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org>:
> Thanks for the tip. There were no pam.d/ files that had pam_tally and
> now pacnew files. I am digging through pam man pages to see if I can
> figure it out. Someone had to disable
:04 PM SET via arch-general
wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 13 novembre 2020 17:06:08 CET Jack Frost via arch-general a écrit
> :
> > So I foo-bared my /home partition, no big deal, done it before, and I
> >...
>
> Had a somehow similar problem yesterday.
>
> After r
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2020 17:06:08 CET Jack Frost via arch-general a écrit
:
> So I foo-bared my /home partition, no big deal, done it before, and I
>...
Had a somehow similar problem yesterday.
After removing all lines with 'pam_tally' in /etc/pam.d/login via ssh
(fortunately work
> My system file is pointing to a non-standard location according to the
> arch wiki:
> [Service]
> Environment=PGROOT=/pathto/pgroot
> PIDFile=/pathto/pgroot/data/postmaster.pid
>
> Anyone else facing the same issue? Any suggestions?
Yes, there is a bug. It cost me my local database.
Yes, that works fine. I am still left not being able to login as root
though. What setting is causing that in Arch?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:09 AM Yash Karandikar via arch-general
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/13/20 10:06 AM, Jack Frost via arch-general wrote:
> > So I foo-bared my
On Fri Nov 13, 2020 at 11:06 AM EST, Jack Frost via arch-general wrote:
> What setting is preventing root from being able to authenticate. I
> noticed when I went to cups on localhost:631 and tried to do an admin
> task and needed to authenticate. Root couldn't login.
Perhaps the roo
On 11/13/20 10:06 AM, Jack Frost via arch-general wrote:
> So I foo-bared my /home partition, no big deal, done it before, and I
> keep good backups. I boot to single mode and get to a prompt. My
> regular user is gone so I try to just login at the console (no X) as
> root. It does
from being able to authenticate. I
noticed when I went to cups on localhost:631 and tried to do an admin
task and needed to authenticate. Root couldn't login.
How do I allow root logins under Arch/Arco linux at a console???
Checking the bug tracker should be the first spot to look for an answer
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68601
Local files got mixed after the test build as the tree contained a rebuild
bump. Just wait for -3 hitting the repos and upgrade to it.
Cheers
On 11/12/20 6:46 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 11/12/20 12:36 PM, riveravaldez via arch-general wrote:
On 11/12/20, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Perhaps this is just me, but it feels like Firefox has gotten super
slow
/ hogging lots of CPU recently. Anyone else seeing this? And/or know
what
On 11/12/20, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Perhaps this is just me, but it feels like Firefox has gotten super slow
> / hogging lots of CPU recently. Anyone else seeing this? And/or know
> what might be causing it? (Some recent upgrade to the package perhaps?)
Just in case, if you're using the
On Tue Nov 10, 2020 at 6:44 PM EST, karx via arch-general wrote:
> There is already a quite lengthy discussion about this issue going on on
> the mailing list.
Apologies. I looked at the wrong archive.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020, 5:02 PM Steven Guikal via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at the thunderbird package, and the reported version is
> 68.12.0-1 which is rather outdated. Trying to install the package also
> installs the outd
Hi,
I'm looking at the thunderbird package, and the reported version is
68.12.0-1 which is rather outdated. Trying to install the package also
installs the outdated version. However, looking at the PKGBUILD it's
78.4.1. Why is this the case?
OpenVPN now runs scripts as the user `openvpn`, not as root.
This tripped me up recently, because I use the `update-systemd-resolved`
script, but it can't do its thing without root.
Just thought I'd put this out there in case anyone else was having issues.
Hello,
Thunderbird allows you to use GnuPG for private key operations if you
can’t/don’t want to import your private key into Thunderbird. This is
a feature lot of us need, because if you use a smartcard-like hardware
solution (Yubikey, Nitrokey, any PGP smartcard…) that’s the only
solution
On 11/8/20 2:12 PM, Archange via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/2020 00:05, Peter via arch-general wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> anthraxx did update the PKGBUILD and we are testing the build but currently
>>> for instance I’m unable to decrypt message
Hi,
On 09/11/2020 00:05, Peter via arch-general wrote:
Hello,
anthraxx did update the PKGBUILD and we are testing the build but
currently for instance I’m unable to decrypt messages using the
external GnuPG feature (reported upstream), and there is also a build
issue with system bzip2 (I
Hello,
anthraxx did update the PKGBUILD and we are testing the build but
currently for instance I’m unable to decrypt messages using the
external GnuPG feature (reported upstream), and there is also a build
issue with system bzip2 (I used the vendored one instead, but that’s
not what we want
Hi,
Le 8 novembre 2020 01:59:07 GMT+04:00, Bjoern Franke via arch-general
a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>> I have not thoroughly tested through things on the build yet, though.
>> I have never used thunderbird much, so I'm not sure I would be the best
>> person to test and ensure a
Hi,
> I have not thoroughly tested through things on the build yet, though.
> I have never used thunderbird much, so I'm not sure I would be the best
> person to test and ensure all of it's features work right. I do want
> to however verify that removing the newly unsupported flags isn't
>
n installation stick, mount all partitions
> under /mnt as during installation, and do an arch-chroot /mnt
>
> I reset my password and the root password in that environment,
> but that didn't help. After a normal boot I'm still locked out.
>
> Any hints to solve this will be much app
lly, and shows the xdm login screen.
> >
> > But my password is not accepted. Same in a tty, also for
> >
> > root.
> >
> > I can boot using an installation stick, mount all partitions
> >
> > under /mnt as during installation, and do an arch-chroot /mn
as during installation, and do an arch-chroot /mnt
I reset my password and the root password in that environment,
but that didn't help. After a normal boot I'm still locked out.
Any hints to solve this will be much appreciated !
--
FA
--
* Website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer
Hi,
I'm an artist who was forced to learn (analog) photography,
but isn't interested in photography. However, since a few month I'm
using a Sony α6400. I'm not aware off any professional Linux software
for artwork, at best software with all professional features does exist,
but gets way to often
Hi,
> Or, you can run Windows as a VM. I don't see any reason (taking into
> account your hardware and windows software needs) why this might be a
> problem for you.
AFAIK you have to use the virtualbox extensions from AUR to use USB
passthrough with an virtual USB 2.0 Controller, otherwise only
ave a 250GB SSD
and two data drives, first is 2TB and second 1TB.
> Is it a good choice to install two OS on my system?
Yes. I explain.
I'm an Arch Linux user since ¿maybe 10 or 15 years ago? I don't
remember... Always have dual boot for Windows and Linux. The reason is
simple, I'm a "gamer
works flawlessly (I mean, as flawless as running only linux)
Cons:
- Secure boot/disk encryption with a TPM is going to be painful.
Without a TPM, there's no issue, though.
- If you are new, there's always a chance you'd mess up the first time
(I remember, during my first Arch installation, I
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 12:02 AM Felix Yan wrote:
>
> ibus 1.5.23+1+gdd4cc5b0-1 has been pushed into [testing]. Sorry for the
> delay.
Excellent, thank you! I just installed ibus 1.5.23 from [testing] and
it is working great.
-Alex
Eli,
> The files should definitely be owned, though... I suspect your issue
> is due to upgrading the pacman version, resulting in some files that
> could not be deleted due to not existing, but were not part of the new
> package and therefore did not exist afterward either.
thanks. in theory
Yash,
i (according to the pacman log) explicitly installed npm-check-updates.
(i've just now removed it; i think i installed it when i was initially
flailing around, trying to understand the npm-verse.)
in terms of arch packages, the arch package page
https://www.archlinux.org/packages
On 11/4/20 1:03 PM, Greg Minshall via arch-general wrote:
> this is just a status update, mostly for anyone in the future who might
> find this useful for their problem. but, if anyone in the near-present
> has any comment, i'm happy. (and, i appreciate all the help up to now!)
>
On 11/4/20 12:03 PM, Greg Minshall via arch-general wrote:
> (145/192) upgrading npm-check-updates
>
Did you explicitly install npm-check-updates or was it a dependency of
something else?
>
> .../rc/package.json shows a dependency on minimist.
Looks like npm-check-upd
this is just a status update, mostly for anyone in the future who might
find this useful for their problem. but, if anyone in the near-present
has any comment, i'm happy. (and, i appreciate all the help up to now!)
presumably this is all fallout from some historic "npm update -g".
way too many
thanks, Nick and Maarten. i guess all paths include some trepidation on
my part.
Nick -- i think it's a good assumption i *did* do some sort of "npm
... -g" action.
i've often wondered how distributions (arch and others) deal with users
of R, (now) npm, etc., doing a system-wide insta
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 15:17, Nick Shvelidze via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> I think running `pacman -Syu --overwrite '/usr/lib/node_modules/*'` is
> safe.
> I have no idea how those files would end up there without using `sudo
> npm install -g`
>
It
I think running `pacman -Syu --overwrite '/usr/lib/node_modules/*'` is safe.
I have no idea how those files would end up there without using `sudo
npm install -g`
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:56 AM Greg Minshall via arch-general
wrote:
>
> hi. [hope all are well, etc.]
>
> i use the
hi, Toni,
thanks for the question. actually, i don't know, but if i bothered to
sudo, it would have been to do -g (global). do you know (maybe it's a
stupid, "well, duh!", question...) if, in that case, my system would
become "un-pacman'able"? especially, in such as way as i've described.
hi. [hope all are well, etc.]
i use the npm package (for managing javascript packages).
today i tried "pacman -Syu", and i got a number of errors about files
under /usr/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules that "exists in
filesystem":
(182/182) checking for file conflicts
error: failed to
On 03.11.2020 15:15, u...@net9.ga wrote:
I have 2 options for that during POST. Press F2 or Del to go into BIOS
configuration and see and reorder the boot devices. This list is a
classical BIOS boot device list. The other option is press F12 and
Don't F2, or Del show more complex screens,
El mar., 3 nov. 2020 a las 15:21, escribió:
>
> Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
>
> > El mar., 3 nov. 2020 a las 10:45, escribi??:
> > >
> > > Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
> > >
> > > > El mar., 3 nov. 2020 a las 9:48,
ent with Óscars suggestion and created a BIOS-GRUB flash drive
to load the ISO as loop device, which went really smooth. I used that
method before, when I originally installed Arch on it, but just for the
reason that I could have multiple ISOs on a stick without reflashing all
the time. That is proba
03.11.2020 14:51, Morne Ross via arch-general пишет:
Hi
Firefly is looking for some developers to add Linux OS support for their
devices and
can give some free samples.
They have the Station P1 RK3399 and Station M1 RK3328 and plan to also
release a RK3568 device in a couple of weeks.
http
://stationpc.com/portal.php?mod=topic=7
Will it be possible for someone to build Arch Linux for it perhaps?
The source code is also available for the devices and they already have
Linux booting with 5.9 kernels.
For further cooperation or help you can contact T-Chip, manufacturer of the
Firefly devices.
s...@t
El mar., 3 nov. 2020 a las 10:45, escribió:
>
> Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
>
> > El mar., 3 nov. 2020 a las 9:48, escribi??:
> > >
> > > Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, I have this script for ip
On 03.11.20 09:54, Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
El mar., 3 nov. 2020 a las 9:48, escribió:
Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
Hi, I have this script for iptables for my archlinux desktop:
https://pastebin.com/SafhsKFt
And when received external request access SSH error
El mar., 3 nov. 2020 a las 9:48, escribió:
>
> Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
>
> > Hi, I have this script for iptables for my archlinux desktop:
> >
> > https://pastebin.com/SafhsKFt
> >
> > And when received external request access SSH er
Hi, I have this script for iptables for my archlinux desktop:
https://pastebin.com/SafhsKFt
And when received external request access SSH error, fail2ban add rule
but the rule not working.
I think it has to do with the iptables script, but the fail2ban
blocking rules add fine but don't ban.
On 11/2/20 1:39 PM, LuKaRo wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm currently building ungoogled-chromium from AUR, which is running for
> 6 hrs now on my 6-core i7-9750H laptop and almost done. However, I'm
> thinking about what happens when the next version will be released. From
> my understanding, when
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020, 12:40 PM LuKaRo wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm currently building ungoogled-chromium from AUR, which is running for
> 6 hrs now on my 6-core i7-9750H laptop and almost done. However, I'm
> thinking about what happens when the next version will be released. From
> my
> There are only my 2 installed hard drives plus a "USB HDD: ..." option.
> I am very positive that this laptop is legacy BIOS only and that it is
> somehow wrongly identified as UEFI?
It can't be "wrongly identified as UEFI". If the laptop didn't support
UEFI, then you wouldn't even see the
El lun., 2 nov. 2020 a las 10:57, Juergen Werner via arch-general
() escribió:
> I tried 2 different USB drives and different USB ports. Am I missing
> something?
Hi jotz. I tell you a method to have a Live USB that boots directly
from ISO and that can have several ISOs.
Let's assume tha
On 02.11.20 15:17, Łukasz Michalski wrote:
There should be two separate entries in boot menu for booting in UEFI mode and
Legacy BIOS mode.
What choices do you have if you open boot device menu?
There are only my 2 installed hard drives plus a "USB HDD: ..." option.
I am very positive that
On 02.11.20 11:22, David Runge wrote:
It seems that your hardware does support UEFI, otherwise systemd-boot
would not be started.
You can check in your BIOS/Firmware. Many older models have both BIOS
and UEFI capabilities and usually you can select which should be used.
I just double checked
Hi,
I started working on my old Laptop again, which is a pre-EFI model and needed a
live USB medium to do some repartitioning. I copied the current installation
ISO to a USB flash. When I try to boot with it, I see the boot menu (which
looks like systemd-boot menu) with only options for UEFI
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 14:55 -0600, Alex Henrie wrote:
> Dear Arch maintainers,
>
> ibus 1.5.23 was released at the end of last month,[1] but Arch is
> still on 1.5.22.[2] Could you please update the package?
ibus 1.5.23+1+gdd4cc5b0-1 has been pushed into [testing]. Sorry f
Do you have _netdev option set for /home in fstab? I can't think of any
reasons this would be a problem. It certainly wouldn't prevent you from
suspending, if anything you'd just encounter trouble when resuming.
Check your systemd config perhaps?
>From the wiki here:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 11:28:29 +0100
Óscar García Amor via arch-general wrote:
> I take this opportunity to comment that I maintain a clean Arch Linux
> image[1] (base and base-devel)
We are now providing base and base-devel in the official Docker Hub
Library on a weekly basis [1]. Pleas
1 - 100 of 3593 matches
Mail list logo
