Re: [arch-general] My Apache Sever Compromised?

2014-04-09 Thread ger...@gmail.com
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:38 PM, ProgAndy wrote: > Am 09.04.2014 19:32, schrieb Jameson: > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Nowaker wrote: >> >>> 199.83.93.35 - - [29/Mar/2014:22:04:54 -0400] > "GET http://ro2.biz/pixel.png HTTP/1.0" 200 151 > >>> But the most interesting part is

Re: [arch-general] X11vnc in xbmc archlinux

2014-04-07 Thread ger...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: > 2014-04-07 13:00 GMT+02:00 ger...@gmail.com : > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Maykel Franco > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, I configured the archlinux + xbmc. I will like remote control xbmc >

Re: [arch-general] X11vnc in xbmc archlinux

2014-04-07 Thread ger...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: > Hi, I configured the archlinux + xbmc. I will like remote control xbmc > with x11vnc from other machine. > > Now, I control the xbmc with xbmc remote from android. > > And also start x11vnc when archlinux boot... > > Thanks in advanced. > Y

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Upgrading Apache to 2.4

2014-03-11 Thread ger...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:41 AM, ger...@gmail.com > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov < > anatol.pomo...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Upgrading Apache to 2.4

2014-03-10 Thread ger...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst > wrote: > > Thanks for taking the effort to finally update Apache! > > > > When trying to start Apache with PHP, I get the same error as Rene. > > > > Just to be clear, what is the

Re: [arch-general] Ruby gem packages in Arch

2014-01-13 Thread ger...@gmail.com
>On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: >As I mentioned above, you can easily reverse that statement. Why throw >Bundler and Rubygems in the mix when you have pacman? I personally think >that having pacman-managed dirs tinkered with by another package manager is >heresy :P I have