On 08/01/2012 08:28 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi,
> please drop me an answer if you are interest in testing the next
> archboot release.
>
> Thanks
> greetings
> tpowa
>
sure
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/15/2012 10:18 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On 02/14/12 at 11:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
>> first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
>> pacman -Syu again and there where 5 targets.
>>
>> # n
On 01/06/2012 01:39 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> 2012/1/5 Tobias Powalowski
>
>> Hi guys,
>> please signoff 3.2 series for both arches.
>>
>> Upstream
>> changes:
>> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>>
>> greetings
>> tpowa
>> --
>> Tobias Powalowski
>> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintain
On 11/18/2011 12:46 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> hi all,
>
> there is a simple rebuild waiting for signoffs in testing. As this
> packages does not have a single signoff since two weeks I am calling out
> to everybody (Dev, TU and users) using it. Just let me know if the
> package still does its in
On 09/01/2011 11:48 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> New cups is sitting in testing now for some time. No bug reports so
> far. It works fine for me. Any objections moving this to extra?
>
> -Andy
>
works flawlessly here also (x86_64)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/30/2011 12:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> bump to latest version.
> Please signoff both arches,
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Signoff x64_64
Still extracts/installs as expected.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/22/2011 01:41 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Dave Reisner
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:13:45PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.88-1 are in testing for upstream
>>> update. Please test and signoff.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>
On 08/13/2011 04:35 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> device-mapper/lvm2 2.02.87-1 are now in testing for an upstream
> update. Please test and signoff. Signoffs from users are welcomed.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
Re-build, Re-booted, Re-porting all well.
Signoff X86_64
On 08/02/2011 06:30 AM, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> Dwight Schauer a écrit :
>
>>> On 02/08/11 18:52, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
>> Because something like fetchmail does the same thing as mpop?
>
> It seems there are plenty reasons to pref
On 08/01/2011 02:13 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The kde4 updates today conflict with Trinity libkipi. I can't figure
> out why?
>
> :: libkipi and kdemod3-libkipi are in conflict. Remove kdemod3-libkipi?
> [y/N]
> error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
>
> Trinity 3.5.12 ins
On 06/30/2011 10:48 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking at the /lib64 folder and wondering what it is really
> needed for... It just seems clutter to me on a pure x86_64 system (or
> even with a multilib in lib32 folders like we have). As far as I can
> tell, most things are perfec
On 06/21/2011 04:33 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
>> contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a
>> little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of
>> initsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2011 08:06 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> I'd like to install GNOME for my freshly installed base system following
> instructions provided on this page 'https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/
> GNOME#Base'. As you can see it reads:
>
> "Instal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2011 12:43 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
{snip}
> In general, if I need to make a package, I copy
> a random PKGBUILD from abs, change the top couple lines, and then set
> the build section to:
>
Now sure why you would copy a existing (possibly O
On 12/19/2010 05:31 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 04/12/10 22:34, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Rebuild and tidy of old package.
>>
>> Signoff both,
>> Allan
>>
>
>
> Anyone. User signoffs are all good too.
>
>
reiserfstune and reiserfsck still work fine here...
Signoff both archs
On 09/06/2010 01:47 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 06.09.2010 21:30, schrieb jwbirdsong:
>> On 09/06/2010 11:29 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> Upstream update, please sign off.
>>>
>>
>> Can still boot to my LVM root so signoff x86_64.
>
> Did you recre
On 09/06/2010 11:29 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Upstream update, please sign off.
>
Can still boot to my LVM root so signoff x86_64.
On 06/25/2010 11:54 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi,
Recently I've been going to my friends' house and installing arch on
their boxes. Some of them had high speed wireless dialup internet (3.1
megabytes/s is the max) which required wvdial, so I had to carry
wvdial's package in another pen
On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas Radke
wrote:
Andreas Radke wrote:
This release works with udev for input hotplugging and supports
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/*.conf as a replaceme
On 06/16/2010 10:06 AM, Nicky726 wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:17:44 +0200
From: ?yvind Heggstad
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:47:16 +0530
Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
The last I heard was that the devs are waiting fo
On 06/16/2010 10:06 AM, Nicky726 wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:17:44 +0200
From: ?yvind Heggstad
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:47:16 +0530
Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
The last I heard was that the devs are waiting fo
On 05/28/2010 11:41 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
This mailing list is only for discussing problems. Besides we use
arch-games repo ;)
On 5/28/10, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi all,
It seems there are lot of games for Linux
On 05/13/2010 04:54 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:47 -0500, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Caleb Cushingwrote:
I tried installing testing on a box running nvidia drivers that I have
at school. X didn't come up. I don't know why and didn't re
On 05/09/2010 12:35 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 08/05/10 23:11, Matěj Týč wrote:
What's wrong with that pacmatic functionality that shomehow tries to
solve this, since it is not implemented in pacman?
pacmantic's functionality is Arch specific while pacman is not.
Message 29 in a thread that h
On 04/24/2010 06:14 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 19/04/10 17:03, Allan McRae wrote:
Last rebuild was over a year ago.
Signoff both,
Allan
Anyone? User signoffs are fine.
Signoff x86_64
On 03/16/2010 10:54 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Ty John wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:08:22 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
USB mice have worked without hal for a long time. It's just
hotplugging that won't work.
Well, I recently co
On 03/01/2010 02:29 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:32:15AM -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
Patch shadow your self w/ aforementioned gentoo patch. works fine
after building w/ the patch.
(maybe a completely stupid question)
Is there a systematic way to get the
On 02/28/2010 03:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/28/2010 03:45 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Two things "Wohoo, I'm free! - last home server moved to Arch!" and second, Arch
has the same bug in the source of shadow src/groupmod.c that renders groupmod
unusable with pam enabled:
[15:
28 matches
Mail list logo
