[arch-general] /dev/stdin /dev/stdout /dev/stderr in initrd/initramfs

hi list members, I don't have /dev/std* (eg. links to /proc/self/fd/{0,1,2}) that were present until a short time ago. is there any change on this side ? udev ? is it necessary to incorporate a particular kernel module in initrd/initramfs to find them again ? regards, lacsaP.

Re: [arch-general] Multi-threaded mkinitpcio

thank you for these details. regard, lacsaP. Le lun. 6 avr. 2020 à 05:39, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> a écrit : > Em abril 4, 2020 12:13 Jelle van der Waa escreveu: > > > > multi-threaded compression does not create a predictable reproducible > > archive (f

Re: [arch-general] Multi-threaded mkinitpcio

, the difference is remarkable. Le ven. 3 avr. 2020 à 14:47, Giancarlo Razzolini a écrit : > Em abril 3, 2020 3:17 Pascal via arch-general escreveu: > > hi, > > > > change the COMPRESSION variable to lz4 ou lzop in your > /etc/mkinitcpio.conf > > : it will consi

Re: [arch-general] Multi-threaded mkinitpcio

hi, change the COMPRESSION variable to lz4 ou lzop in your /etc/mkinitcpio.conf : it will considerably reduce the compression time. grep COMP /etc/mkinitcpio.conf # COMPRESSION #COMPRESSION="gzip" #COMPRESSION="bzip2" #COMPRESSION="lzma" #COMPRESSION="xz" #COMPRESSION="lzop" COMPRESSION="lz4" # C

Re: [arch-general] kernel full compilation ?

moreover, this seems to only concern the modules, i.e. the parts external parts of the kernel, which is not the case with blk-core.c... Le mar. 3 mars 2020 à 23:56, Filipe Laíns via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> a écrit : > On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 16:50 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk via arc

Re: [arch-general] kernel full compilation ?

this is not a patch :-) this is only for testing (https://github.com/msuhanov/Linux-write-blocker) Pascal Le mar. 3 mars 2020 à 17:36, Filipe Laíns via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> a écrit : > On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 14:29 +0100, Pascal via arch-general wrote: > >

Re: [arch-general] kernel full compilation ?

799,7 +799,7 @@ "to read-only block-device %s (partno %d)\n", bio_devname(bio, b), part->partno); /* Older lvm-tools actually trigger this */ - return false; + return true; } return false; Le mar. 3 mars 2020 à 14:19, Caleb Maclennan a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:

Re: [arch-general] kernel full compilation ?

thank you for these details. regards, lacsaP. Le mar. 3 mars 2020 à 14:10, José Luis via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> a écrit : > Check ccache, it may help with recompile time after the first compilation > is done. >

Re: [arch-general] kernel full compilation ?

no, it's not a bug. it's necessary to recompile completely even if the kernel I'm using is the same as the one I want to apply a small modification on ? Le mar. 3 mars 2020 à 14:00, Giancarlo Razzolini a écrit : > Em março 3, 2020 9:54 Pascal via arch-general escreveu: &g

[arch-general] kernel full compilation ?

hello, I need to introduce a small modification in linux-5.4.23/block/blk-core.o : do I need to recompile completely (~4 hours) or is there a way to shorten the compilation time ? I followed Kernel/Arch_Build_System . regards, lacsaP

Re: [arch-general] broken pipe

hi, https://github.com/patatetom/hashs and merry Christmas. Le jeu. 19 déc. 2019 à 23:16, Pascal a écrit : > hi Ralph, > > thank you for that clarification. > the function works a little faster with them. > > file_info(){ echo -n ${1:=/dev/stdin}$'\t'; ( tee < &qu

Re: [arch-general] broken pipe

6989542fabd98b04086524d1106b7907 - ... big.tarapplication/x-gtar53f0d0240e5ddc94266087ec96ebb802236fa0bc -6989542fabd98b04086524d1106b7907 - real2m36,013s user0m9,349s sys0m50,257s Le jeu. 19 déc. 2019 à 11:59, Ralph Corderoy a écrit : > Hi Pascal, > > > fi

Re: [arch-general] broken pipe

time ( file_info elementaryos-5.1-stable.20191202.iso ) elementaryos-5.1-stable.20191202.iso application/octet-stream cbe37d55c44db5bb0ab0ae6f5bf0eb96209bb16f - d1addd17377aa73700680ff937d7a0f4 - real 0m35.217s user 0m0.316s sys 0m2.146s Le mer. 18 déc. 2019 à 16:42, Andy Pieters a écrit : > On Wed, 18 Dec

Re: [arch-general] broken pipe

e ‐‐‐ > On Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:20 PM, Pascal via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > hello, > > > > it works perfectly because both tools used, md5sum and sha1sum, consume > all > > the data. > > > > on t

[arch-general] broken pipe

hello, to avoid having to read twice the entire large file, I use the tee tool in this way to calculate two checksums "simultaneously" : file_info(){ echo -n ${1:=/dev/stdin}$'\t' ( tee < "${1}" \ >( md5sum >&3 ) \ >( sha1sum >&3 ) \ >/dev/null

[arch-general] journalctl

hello, when I use journalctl to track system events, I introduce line breaks for better readability. like multitail, I would like to introduce more verbose line breaks... I wrote these few lines but it doesn't work as expected : exec 6<&0 exec 0< <( while :; do read -sn1 k; echo $'\n'"# $( date +%

Re: [arch-general] adb backup broken named pipe

Indeed, but it has to face two constraints, the second being directly related to the first : limited storage space and access to the data backed up through archivemount which does not support the android backup format. Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 10:32, Ralph Corderoy a écrit : > Hi Pascal, >

Re: [arch-general] adb backup broken named pipe

*(sorry, bad Ctrl-C Ctrl-V)* yes, but I have two constraints, the second being directly related to the first : limited storage space and access to data backed up through archivemount that does not support the android backup format. Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 11:49, Pascal a écrit : > Indeed, but

Re: [arch-general] adb backup broken named pipe

does anyone have any idea what should be added/removed at the end of the data to properly complete the tgz archive ? regards, lacsaP. Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 16:00, Pascal a écrit : > when I looked a little closer at what adb backup was doing, I realized > that it was communicating with

Re: [arch-general] adb backup broken named pipe

b"ANDROID BACKUP\n4\n1\nnone\n" sys.stdout.buffer.write(b"\x1f\x8b\x08\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00") data = s.recv(32768) while data: sys.stdout.buffer.write(data) data = s.recv(32768) regards, lacsaP. Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 10:57, Pascal a écrit : > hello, > > I'

[arch-general] adb backup broken named pipe

hello, I'm looking for a solution for the problem below : all leads are welcome ! the adb tool is able to make a backup of a smartphone in a file: adb backup -all -f mybackup.ab however, the file mybackup.ab has a particular format that prevents it from being used "simply". to convert it into a

[arch-general] kernel compilation

hello members, I'm not used to compiling and therefore even less to compiling the kernel I followed the instructions given by this page . after compilation, if I modify/patch file src/linux-4.19/block/blk-core.c, do I have to rep

Re: [arch-general] python 3.5 with or without python 3.7

pyenv <https://github.com/pyenv/pyenv> did the job perfectly ! thank you for this tip :-) regards, lacsaP. Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 14:59, Pascal a écrit : > thanks > ok, this is the last top post ;-) > > Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 14:55, Mr.Elendig a > écrit : > >> O

Re: [arch-general] python 3.5 with or without python 3.7

thanks ok, this is the last top post ;-) Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 14:55, Mr.Elendig a écrit : > On 07/01/2019 14:52, Pascal via arch-general wrote: > > what would be the command line for pipenv (eg. user wide) ? > > > > Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 14:36, Mr.Elendig a > écrit

Re: [arch-general] python 3.5 with or without python 3.7

what would be the command line for pipenv (eg. user wide) ? Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 14:36, Mr.Elendig a écrit : > On 07/01/2019 14:34, Pascal via arch-general wrote: > > hello members (and happy new year), > > my system is up to date and works with python 3.7. > > for a spe

Re: [arch-general] python 3.5 with or without python 3.7

arch-general@archlinux.org> a écrit : > On 1/7/19 8:34 AM, Pascal via arch-general wrote: > > hello members (and happy new year), > > my system is up to date and works with python 3.7. > > for a specific need, I want to install python 3.5 but cannot go down > > be

[arch-general] python 3.5 with or without python 3.7

hello members (and happy new year), my system is up to date and works with python 3.7. for a specific need, I want to install python 3.5 but cannot go down because its installation breaks an dependency: :: installing python (3.5.2-1) breaks dependency 'python>=3.7' required by libreoffice-still. wh

Re: [arch-general] nouveau and nividia bios extract

It's building fine on my computer (x86_64), is your system up-to-date ? Are you sure you have all dependencies installed? 2014-10-25 21:38 GMT+02:00 pete nikolic : > > Hi folks . > > One of those i cant sort on my own i am afraid > > > I have downloaded the nouveau-fw package run makepkg it down

Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update

Le Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:13:34 -0500 "David C. Rankin" a écrit: > > Sure, the whole log is here: > > http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/supersff/pacman.log.bz2 > > I have put all the files related to the bug in that directory: > > http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bu

Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update

Le Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:30:53 -0500 "David C. Rankin" a écrit: > > Here is what is showing up in the errors.log that shows the problem started > with the updates on 10/8 > Could you post the 60-70 last lines of /var/log/pacman.log ?

Re: [arch-general] X dead with intel video - what provides module "fbcon"

Le Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:46:36 -0500 "David C. Rankin" a écrit: > On Thursday 15 October 2009 06:37:43 pm Mikael Eriksson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 06:30:29PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > > > After picking around in the logs, one recurring error seems to be: > > > > >

Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latestkernel update

Le Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:48:44 +0200 Rafa Griman a écrit: > Hi :) > > On Wednesday 14 October 2009 21:35:58 David C. Rankin wrote: > > On Monday 12 October 2009 02:51:51 pm Dusty wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > I have managed to upgrade (pacman -Syu) grabbing the new kernel upgrade > > > and no

Re: [arch-general] having a problem from upgraded vim again (version 266)

Le Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:06:57 +0800 b4283 a écrit: > I'm having these errors even when i start vim with no parameters, are > anyone seeing the same? > > $ LC_ALL=POSIX LANG=POSIX vim > > E486: Pattern not found: <\s*\([ap]\|img\)\s*$ > E486: Pattern not found: <\s*a\s[^>]*>[^<]*$ > search hit B

Re: [arch-general] xmonad and java environment

Le Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:34:57 -0600 Sergey Manucharian a écrit: > Hi all, > > I've installed openproj from AUR and met the following issue: the > program runs, but the main GUI window is blank (no buttons, menus - > nothing), although the dialog windows appear normal. I don't have much > experien

Re: [arch-general] New kernel/updates - Is the timezone information messed up for dual-boot configs?

Le Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:29:03 +0200, Alessandro Doro a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:17:55PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > Listmates, > > > > I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I > > think I have found the problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the > > timezone ha

Re: [arch-general] Howto create initial xorg.conf for intel 915?

Le Mon, 18 May 2009 05:12:33 -0500, "David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E." a écrit : > On or about Monday 18 May 2009 at approximately 05:06:28 Jan de Groot > composed: > > On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 04:51 -0500, David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > > > Listmates: > > > > > > I have been throught > > > http://w