[arch-general] Got segmentation fault after upgrade

2017-02-24 Thread piequiex
X.Org X Server 1.19.1 Release Date: 2017-01-11 [ 150.768] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 [ 150.770] Build Operating System: Linux 4.8.14-1-ARCH x86_64 [ 150.772] Current Operating System: Linux localhost 4.9.11-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Feb 19 13:45:52 UTC 2017 x86_64 [ 150.780] Build

Re: [arch-general] Christmas gift?

2016-12-31 Thread piequiex
Can we please ban the source of the useless message? > Ok, mods (assuming we have such) can be we please ban this joker? -- Have a nice day!

Re: [arch-general] Christmas gift?

2016-12-29 Thread piequiex
> On 12/28/2016 05:25 PM, piequiex wrote: > > http://sprunge.us/PIRG > > I don't know what this is supposed to be, but I really doubt it is a > "Christmas gift" which would imply you were trying to do *us* a favor > here by sending an anonymous link with

[arch-general] Christmas gift?

2016-12-28 Thread piequiex
http://sprunge.us/PIRG -- Have a nice day!

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-04 Thread piequiex
> On 12/02/16 at 05:47am, piequiex wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > [ 65.955101] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at > > 81e0 > > Welp, sounds like you a kernel bug, either the kernel just locked up or > hit a B

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-03 Thread piequiex
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 00:30:43 + (GMT), piequiex wrote: > >> give some context and some information about what you upgraded, what > >> you were doing when it happened and what software was running. > >> Looking > >Read original message. > >On boot

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-03 Thread piequiex
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:25:57 + (GMT) > piequiex <piequ...@nym.mixmin.net> wrote: > > > Have a nice day! > > > > > > > > > You too! > > Useless message. > > P.S. Adjust MUA setings. > > Just as useless as you origina

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-03 Thread piequiex
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 00:30:43 + (GMT) > piequiex <piequ...@nym.mixmin.net> wrote: > > > > Whatever you expected to happen. I'm going to go through a few things > > The logical conclusion. > > Logical conclusion: It crashed. What more do you wan

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-02 Thread piequiex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:25 PM, piequiex <piequ...@nym.mixmin.net> wrote: > >> [ 66.078059] RIP [] __memmove+0x24/0x1a0 > >> [ 66.080161] RSP > >> [ 66.082193] CR2: 81e0 > >> [

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-02 Thread piequiex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Hi, > > http://bfy.tw/8wi1 #YZTGSL Ybtb pbybe fznyy GUVF vf gur vagrearg. GURFR yrg lbh frnepu vg. freivpr.cerfragngvba freivpr.cerfragngvba (gurer'f zber, gurfr ner whfg gur zbfg cbchyne) Arkg gvzr lbh unir n

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-02 Thread piequiex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > On 2 Dec 2016 6:47 am, "piequiex" <piequ...@nym.mixmin.net> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > upgraded linux (4.8.10-1 -> 4.8.11-1) > 4.8.11-1-ARCH > [ 65.955101]

[arch-general] After upgrade

2016-12-01 Thread piequiex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 upgraded linux (4.8.10-1 -> 4.8.11-1) 4.8.11-1-ARCH [ 65.955101] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 81e0 [ 65.956510] IP: [] __memmove+0x24/0x1a0 [ 65.957874] PGD 1a09067 PUD 1a0a063 PMD 0 [ 65.959198] Oops: [#17]

[arch-general] abs & sourceforge.net

2016-11-23 Thread piequiex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is what I got from sourceforge while trying to build some packet. *.tar.xz: HTML document, UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines *.tar.xz.asc: HTML document, UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines REFRESH(5 sec):