Hi
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that tries
to find Arch out-of-date packages. The tool
Hi
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Don deJuan donjuans...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/12/2013 03:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Don deJuan donjuans...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 11:26 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
Per discussion in 'pacman-dev'
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that tries
to find Arch out-of-date packages. The tool scans PKGBUILD files is
/var/abs directory, extracts download url and then tries
On 05/12/2013 03:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Don deJuan donjuans...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 11:26 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that
tries
to find Arch out-of-date
On 05/11/2013 11:26 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that tries
to find Arch out-of-date packages. The tool scans PKGBUILD files is
/var/abs directory, extracts download url and then tries to probe download
urls for the
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:26:19AM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
There are some fals positive and negative results though, mostly because
download servers return different sort of weird responses. I still work on
work-arounds for all these cases.
Have you any ideas how to avoid showing
Hi
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Don deJuan donjuans...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 11:26 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that
tries
to find Arch out-of-date packages. The tool scans PKGBUILD files is
Hi
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:26:19AM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
There are some fals positive and negative results though, mostly because
download servers return different sort of weird responses. I still work
Hi everyone
Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that tries
to find Arch out-of-date packages. The tool scans PKGBUILD files is
/var/abs directory, extracts download url and then tries to probe download
urls for the next version. Next versions look like
X.Y.Z+1
9 matches
Mail list logo