Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-12 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/12/2011 12:17 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: 2011/1/12 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com: On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:37 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/11/2011 05:27 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: snip if kde3 is left installed on the system. This is a bug. kde4 shouldn't generate a 'k'de 'sys'tem

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-11 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/10/2011 10:24 PM, 宋文武 wrote: KDE3 had done well, in fact I like it most in a mass of DEs. I guess it is the issue of xdg-autostart. Try to remove ~/.config/autostart(I'm not sure where it is :) Thank you 宋文武. I'll see if that will work. It might, because basket notepads (fantastic

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-11 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 17:01 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: Ultimately though, there is still the question of why on Arch? to be answered. When I find the culprit, I'll pass it on so we can revisit whether there is something in how k4 is packaged for Arch needs tweaking. Yes, why don't we

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-11 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/11/2011 05:27 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Yes, why don't we tweak upstream so that an unsupported older version can run alongside. Nothing against kde3, but if you want to use older versions, you're responsible to solve the incompatibilities (which you're trying to do) and perhaps maintain

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-11 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:37 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/11/2011 05:27 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Yes, why don't we tweak upstream so that an unsupported older version can run alongside. Nothing against kde3, but if you want to use older versions, you're responsible to solve the

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-11 Thread Ray Rashif
2011/1/12 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com: On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:37 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/11/2011 05:27 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Yes, why don't we tweak upstream so that an unsupported older version can run alongside. Nothing against kde3, but if you want to use older versions,

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-10 Thread David Rosenstrauch
On 01/09/2011 02:45 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/08/2011 04:21 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: Seriously David, I think it's time for you to give up on kde3 already. You can't expect the people on the Arch list to help support old, unsupported, and out of date software. The more you bring

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-10 Thread 宋文武
KDE3 had done well, in fact I like it most in a mass of DEs. I guess it is the issue of xdg-autostart. Try to remove ~/.config/autostart(I'm not sure where it is :)

Re: [arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/08/2011 04:21 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: Seriously David, I think it's time for you to give up on kde3 already. You can't expect the people on the Arch list to help support old, unsupported, and out of date software. The more you bring your Arch box up to date the less and less

[arch-general] (now 4.5.5-1) Re: kde-4.5.4 loads kde3 kicker and background (even with ~/.kde ~/.kde4 removed)

2011-01-08 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/08/2011 02:16 PM, Martín Cigorraga wrote: Hello David, I updated yesterday to latest and greatest 4.5.5-1 and everything is working fine here =) Best wishes for this new year! Thanks Martin, It is looking like an Arch packaging issue or a config issue for my i686 boxes (I