Re: [arch-general] [Announcement] Discussion about restricting arch-security for public participation

2016-01-28 Thread AIS Information
As a consumer of the list, i would actually prefer that it was closed. I want emails only when they are official security announcements from arch security team. Thanks for asking. Keep up the good work! ps. IMHO, the mailing lists rules, etiquette, best practices, how to report a security issue

Re: [arch-general] [Announcement] Discussion about restricting arch-security for public participation

2016-01-27 Thread Mauro Santos
On 28-01-2016 00:41, Levente Polyak wrote: > Our main goal behind this change is to separate relevant official > announcements and advisories from possibly long and frequent > discussions. The security teams idea is that each announcement to the > arch-security list should be considered as an

Re: [arch-general] [Announcement] Discussion about restricting arch-security for public participation

2016-01-27 Thread Gustavo De Nardin (spuk)
On 27 January 2016 at 22:41, Levente Polyak wrote: > the policy of the arch-security mailinglist is currently changed to a > restricted advisory announcements only list due to certain reason > roughly explained on the arch-devops [0] and arch-dev-public [1] lists. > > As

Re: [arch-general] [Announcement] Discussion about restricting arch-security for public participation

2016-01-27 Thread Drew DeVault
> the policy of the arch-security mailinglist is currently changed to a > restricted advisory announcements only list due to certain reason > roughly explained on the arch-devops [0] and arch-dev-public [1] lists. I noticed this change when I tried to reply to today's nginx advisory by mentioning