Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: USB Buffering Issue

2011-12-03 Thread pomhg
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 00:44:33 +0800, Kevin Chadwick wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:03:37 +0800 pomhg wrote: Hi,I've got same problem here. I'm using xfce with udiskie and rox instead of thunar for automounting. With 'rox copy' or 'cp', it just immediately ended. From iotop I can see that 'f

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: USB Buffering Issue

2011-12-03 Thread Ross Hamblin
Please excuse my previous rant on this subject, it was sent in error. My bad.

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: USB Buffering Issue

2011-12-03 Thread Ross Hamblin
And here is an example of what happens to the underlying system when one sector of the dev community does not listen to or consider the needs of others when changing or removing legacy(their words not mine) functionality. In customising and stripping away "unnecessary" stuff Ubuntu has determined t

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: USB Buffering Issue

2011-12-03 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:03:37 +0800 pomhg wrote: > Hi,I've got same problem here. I'm using xfce with udiskie and rox instead > of thunar for automounting. > With 'rox copy' or 'cp', it just immediately ended. From iotop I can see > that 'flush' is still active. > So my solution is writing a sh

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: USB Buffering Issue

2011-12-03 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:03:37 +0800 pomhg wrote: > Hi,I've got same problem here. I'm using xfce with udiskie and rox instead > of thunar for automounting. > With 'rox copy' or 'cp', it just immediately ended. From iotop I can see > that 'flush' is still active. > So my solution is writing a sh