It doesn't look like it has changed since the last 3 odd years, which
is probably a good thing. And i can't say i'm not guilty for part of
the nonsense =p
(this may be a top post)
On 19/03/2010, Patrick Burroughs wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 15:37, Brendan Long wrote:
>> Parts of it are fun
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 15:37, Brendan Long wrote:
> Parts of it are funny (like the pacman section), but most of it doesn't
> even make sense..
Most of Uncyclopedia doesn't make sense. I think they huffed too many kittens.
~celti
On 03/18/2010 03:38 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> Sharing ArchLinux's article on uncyclopedia[1]. Its awefully funny. I almost
> fell from my chair laughing.
>
> Here is a small part of it:
>
> "The almighty Judd has succeeded in making Archlinux the only Linux
> distribution which combines
Hi,
Sharing ArchLinux's article on uncyclopedia[1]. Its awefully funny. I almost
fell from my chair laughing.
Here is a small part of it:
"The almighty Judd has succeeded in making Archlinux the only Linux
distribution which combines all the worst features Slackware and Gentoo have
to offer
4 matches
Mail list logo
